|
Video: America’s First Marxist President?
|
Video: America's First Marxist President?
"?baMa? Tse Dung" wrote in message ... WTF have you sacrified? Yeah, yeah, I know, George Bush gave his life for you in battle, asshole. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5349 (20100807) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On Aug 8, 11:50*am, "Colonel Kurtz" wrote:
On *8-Aug-2010, "Mama Bear Skinner" Bear wrote: Why don't you debate what kind of cardboard box you'll be living in soon? You elected the *******s, you send you ****ant wages overseas and all you can do is blame someone else??? * Hahahhahhaaa Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. *Why don't you debate which of your kids to throw into Bush's wars. Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming. So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution? Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea? I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic... |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 8/9/2010 3:28 AM, dxAce wrote:
Mike "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote: On Aug 8, 11:50 am, "Colonel Kurtz" wrote: On 8-Aug-2010, "Mama Bear Skinner" Bear wrote: Why don't you debate what kind of cardboard box you'll be living in soon? You elected the *******s, you send you ****ant wages overseas and all you can do is blame someone else??? Hahahhahhaaa Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. Why don't you debate which of your kids to throw into Bush's wars. Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming. So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution? Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against the Federal tanks and helicopters? The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan. It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the war, so why would anyone be scared of you. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 8/9/2010 12:53 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan. Yeah, and they drove out everybody from Genghis Khan to the Russians too. You'd think W would have learned something from that. It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the war, so why would anyone be scared of you. Um Scotty, you seem to be overlooking something... The Democrats, having inherited the war, have only been there a year and a half and you blame them for losing the war? The Republicans were there for *EIGHT* years and did *not* win the war. You don't blame them? You want the Dems to do in a year and a half what the Repubs could not do in EIGHT years??? How careless of you to overlook that. Furthermore, the tanks and helicopters you whine about above seemed "to be useless" against those VC guys on bicycles wearing black pyjamas. Odd, but I don't remember those great Republicans Nixon and Ford winning the Viet Nam war. How forgetful of you. Other than proving yourself to be a real dip**** (IMHO) and bigot with a short memory, what's your point? |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 8-Aug-2010, Mike wrote: Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. *Why don't you debate which of your kids to throw into Bush's wars. Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming. So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution? Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea? I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic... You won't be mesmerized because you won't understand. I closed 2 plants when industrial output hit the skids, in 2004 and 2005. I now produce overseas and you clowns pay through the ass for very inexpensively made merchandise. I cannot change the U.S. because 98% of "Americans" don't give a flying rats ass nor are they willing to participate in correcting the debacle. It's your, or you kids problem. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 9-Aug-2010, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution? Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against the Federal tanks and helicopters? The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan. It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the war, so why would anyone be scared of you. Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the military is hobbled by bedwetters. At this point you can only hope the humiliation of the U.S. can be overcome some day. With all the politically correct foolhardiness going on, the U.S. is 1) broke, 2) humiliated, 3) wringing it's hands, and 4) hoping the U.N. will adopt what remains. The United States of only 25 years ago cannot be reconstructed. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 8-Aug-2010, wrote: Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. Why don't you debate which of your kids to throw into Bush's wars. Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming. So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution? Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea? I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic... On 8/17/2010 6:40 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote: You won't be mesmerized because you won't understand. I closed 2 plants when industrial output hit the skids, in 2004 and 2005. I now produce overseas and you clowns pay through the ass for very inexpensively made merchandise. I cannot change the U.S. because 98% of "Americans" don't give a flying rats ass nor are they willing to participate in correcting the debacle. It's your, or you kids problem. You may be right that we "pay through the ass for very inexpensively made merchandise"...but that merchandise is STILL cheaper (waaay cheaper) than stuff made in the USA. Not so much as people "not giving a flying rat's ass" as much as it is that people, many without jobs want, nay, need "cheap" merchandise. If the American sheeple ever wake up and get wise, watch out! There won't be enough tar and feathers for politicians of either stripe. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 8/17/2010 6:51 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the military is hobbled by bedwetters. Well, it's just slightly possible that your half-baked theory of "the military is hobbled by bedwetters" is true, but then how would you explain the following? 1) In Iraq, the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites have been warring for hundreds of years. They still are. They still will be when we leave. Were they "hobbled by bedwetters"? 2) In Afghanistan, ANY and ALL occupiers over the last THOUSAND years, from Genghis Khan to the Russians, have been thrown out. Were the Russkies and Genghis all hobbled by bedwetters too? Or did that moron Bush put us in to two totally unwinnable situations? Nice theory of yours, but it might behoove you to brush up a bit on your world history. |
America's Marxist
On Aug 18, 11:08*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote: Dave for some/many it is just a 'feeling' that America was better back then in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and even up to the 1990s. You can't fix the future by disrespecting it. The '80s sucked. The '60s sucked. The '70s was probably the high water mark for this country. Even though the 70's brought us (shudder) disco? |
America's Marxist
On Aug 18, 8:08*am, dave wrote:
- - RHF wrote: - - Dave for some/many it is just a 'feeling' that - - America was better back then in the 1950s, - - 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and even up to the 1990s. - You can't fix the future by disrespecting it. Dave - You can't fix the Future by disrespecting the Past. - The '80s sucked. The '60s sucked. - The '70s was probably the high water - mark for this country. Dave - I am sorry to hear that for so many decades that your Life "Sucked" . . . while mine has been a Wonderful Life decade after decade hear in the Good Old USA - pal ~ RHF |
America's Marxist
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:47 -0700 (PDT), RHF
wrote: On Aug 18, 5:34*am, dave wrote: * The United States of only 25 years ago cannot be reconstructed. - Why would you want to? -*Savings and Loan collapse? -*Iran Contra? -*Crack epidemic? - New Coke? - Things always look greener on the other side of the fence. Dave for some/many it is just a 'feeling' that America was better back then in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and even up to the 1990s. WACO ! 9/11 Attacks ! Islam-O-Fascism ! War on Terrorism ! Narco-Terrorism ! Economic Collapse of 2008~2016 TARP ! Obama-Care ! dave - not a "fact" just a 'feeling' . . . and to some 'feelings' are facts ~ RHF . If you are looking for a perfect America where such scandals and improprieties won't exist then you'll be waiting for the end of time because it will never happen. The one thing that we did not have in those decades past was a population that believed they were simply entitled to anything and everything and government was going to take away from one group in order to give to another. Until the citizens literally take back their country from the ****ing government you will see no change for the better. When Watergate happened everyone from the citizenry up through all ranks of government were ****ed and demanding action. If Watergate were to occur today (or another Waco or Iran Contra etc) porbably no one other than politicians would give a **** and only then because they could use such events to their own benefit. A large portion of the population today only care about one thing, "I'm gonna get mine". That was not the case 25 or 30 years back. Politicians have always been predominately crooked to one degree or another. But nowadays the people have become nearly as corrupt in their thinking as the politicians. As I stated here around 2 years ago, the people will elect the government they deserve. And they have. We have become a much more divided nation than we have been in decades and we now have a government that reflects it. Instead of the people being the bosses of the government the government now tells us what to think and how to feel. You gave examples of a lot of bad things that occured throughout the last 30 or so years but it should also be noted that in that same time period, as a people, we were better human beings than we are today. Then we tried to look out for our neighbors and it was common to see folks talking to each other over their fences and their children playing up and down the streets of their neighborhoods. 50 years ago people, whether successful at it or not, at least tried to live a "Leave It To Beaver" lifestyle. We would stop and help a stranded stranger on the side of the road and typically neither party had any reason to be fearful of the other. We had no problem throwing a few bucks into the salvation army bucket or at some other charity near the holidays. Nowadays we are generally afraid to even drive down the street without being safely locked in our cars, we are afraid to let our kids play together outside after school and we look at our neighbors that may have a little more than us with disdain. And instead of trying to live the American dream we now lazily say that "it's impossible to live a perfect life so **** it, may as well be an asshole." Indeed, we might possibly be much better off today if the people themselves had the same morals and outlooks on life that they had 30 or more years ago. If we did then maybe we would not be so quick to tolerate the type of bull**** that we've had to put up with for the last 25 years. |
(OT) : America's Marxist : More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
On Aug 18, 7:35*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:08:59 -0500, First Post wrote: If you are looking for a perfect America where such scandals and improprieties won't exist then you'll be waiting for the end of time because it will never happen. * - Then why do conservatives make claims they - are without fault and stand for "principles" - which they break consistently? No One of any political stripe is With-Out-Fault. So it is better to have no 'principles'; guiding rules and values; moral compass; And instead just do what you want to do -cause- then you have broken none of your on 'principles' -cause- you have none. Until the citizens literally take back their country from the ****ing government you will see no change for the better. - For what reason? A Government {Country/Nation} : Of the People -not- the Political Elite By the People -not- the Political Elite For the People -not- the Political Elite As I stated here around 2 years ago, the people will elect the government they deserve. - And the finest example of the worst you - can get was Reagan and Bush. - Utter failures, domestically and internationally. Prez Obama is doing a real good job of setting a new bench mark of uber-failure on many fronts. You gave examples of a lot of bad things that occured throughout the last 30 or so years but it should also be noted that in that same time period, as a people, we were better human beings than we are today. - Unfortunately, that bull**** too Good - Now you are talking about something that you have some expertise in . . . - There is more hunger today than 30 years ago And "Who" has been the US Prez-A-Duntz for the last Year and a Half -hint- Prez Obama [D]. And "Who" has controlled both House of the US Congress since 2007 -hint- Pelosi [D] and Reid [D]. - There is more segregation, more racial hatred and - more attacks on the constitution by religious and - tin-hatted morons Keep Preaching that 'classic' 1950s Democrat Party of the USA Racial Hatred; Class Warfare and Attacks on Persons of Faith. ?Q? Aren't Persons of Faith Americans the equal of every US Citizen with the Full Rights of each US Citizen including the Right, Duty and Responsibility to Fully Participate in the American Political Process: Vote, Join a Party, Run for Elected Office, and Hold Elected Office in the USA ? - There is more hypocrisy from the right who say - one thing, and do the opposite---from tax cuts, - to patriotism. So it is better to have NO Values and thus never have to be called a 'hypocrite'. - Two Republican presidents outright committed perjury and lied - repeatedly to congress, to the courts and to the American people--- Bill Clinton 'is' {was} a US Prez-A-Duntz too . . . LBJ 'Gulf of Tonkin Incident'ed us into the Vietnam War Some even claim that FDR allowed Pearl Harbor to happen to get us into WWII. .. . . More Democrat Inconvenient Truths . . . - Conservatives have been in the forefront of subverting the - constitution and rule of law since the late 60's---from Nixon, - to Reagan and then Bush. JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton and Obama would not want to be left-out on the list of evil doers. -*Utter lying, perjuring sonsabitched all three. Good - Now you are talking about something that you have some personal expertise in . . . - And all you can whine about is....... - much ado about nothing---ignoring - YOUR president's lies and stupidity. OK now we can see that your are clearly Talking About : Prez Obama Nowadays we are generally afraid to even drive down the street without being safely locked in our cars, - Then hire more cops. More Cops Ain't The Answer -where-as- An Informed and Armed Citizenry Is : Along With Laws That Insure US Citizens Have the Right To : Protect Themselves; Their Families and The Homes {Property} from Criminals committing Crimes. - Stop supporting those who claim "less government" - is good for you. Fewer Cops, Firemen and Teachers ain't the "Less Government" that the Voters {US Citizens} are Asking for but they are the First Things that the Crooked Evil Politicians Cut to Stick-It-To the People. Indeed, we might possibly be much better off today if the people themselves had the same morals and outlooks on life that they had 30 or more years ago. - ****, what a dip**** Again - Now you are talking about something that you have some personal expertise in . . . - You mean like McCarthy? - - Or Nixon? - - Or Reagan (perjury, obstruction, subverting government)? - - And the litany of immoral, illegal, greedy, hypocritical *******s of - conservatism from the DixieCrats becoming republicans because they - hated the Civil Rights act---to the outright smears you conducted - against CLinton because he kicked your ass day in, day out. Bill Clinton 'is' {was} a US Prez-A-Duntz too . . . * Protege of & Sponsored by J. William Fulbright LBJ 'Gulf of Tonkin Incident'ed us into the Vietnam War -wrt- Senator Albert Gore, Sr. Some even claim that FDR allowed Pearl Harbor to happen to get us into WWII. * FDR kept the US Military segregated in WWII after Prez Wilson had re-segregated it in WWI. .. . . More Democrat Inconvenient Truths . . . - You're the poster child of rightwing ignorance and stupidity Good - Now you are talking about something that you have some left-wing personal expertise in . . . back at you with .. . . More Democrat Inconvenient Truths . . . ~ RHF |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
RHF wrote:
[...] Some even claim that FDR allowed Pearl Harbor to happen to get us into WWII. There's a lot of evidence that he did. And there's a shortwave connection to the story, too. See http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2008/10/east-wind-rain/ * FDR kept the US Military segregated in WWII after Prez Wilson had re-segregated it in WWI. [...] And to think that there are some so foolishly partisan that they claim that no Democrat ever did anything good! Partisanship clouds the mind and atrophies the heart. Actually, Woodrow Wilson said some very sensible things about race. To a group of Black leaders, he said: "Segregation is not humiliating but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen." -- Woodrow Wilson, 1913 Of the terrible days of the so-called Reconstruction period, Wilson wrote: "It was a menace to society itself that the negroes should thus of a sudden be set free and left without tutelage or restraint.... The country filled with vagrants, looking for pleasure and gratuitous fortune. Idleness bred want, as always, and the vagrants turned thieves or inopportune beggars. The tasks of ordinary labor stood untouched; the idlers grew insolent, dangerous; nights went anxiously by, for fear of riot and incendiary fire. It was imperatively necessary that something should be done.... The southern legislatures, therefore, promptly undertook remedies of their own - such remedies as English legislators had been familiar with time out of mind." -- Woodrow Wilson in _The New York Age_, July 11, 1912 On the issue of non-White immigration, Wilson stated: "I stand for the national policy of exclusion. The whole question is one of assimilation of diverse races. We cannot make an homogeneous population of a people who do not blend with the Caucasian race.... Oriental coolieism will give us another race problem to solve, and surely we have had our lesson." -- Woodrow Wilson, 1912 And, just in case some foolish partisans think I am giving all the glory to Wilson, it's also important to remember that Wilson's Republican contemporary, Theodore Roosevelt, was also sane when it came to most racial matters: "Nineteenth-century democracy needs no more complete vindication for its existence than the fact that it has kept for the white race the best portions of the new world's surface -- temperate America and Australia. Had these regions been under aristocratic governments, Chinese immigration would have been encouraged precisely as the slave trade is encouraged of necessity by any slave-holding oligarchy, and the result would in a few generations have been even more fatal to the white race; but the democracy, with the clear instinct of race selfishness, saw the race foe, and kept out the dangerous alien." -- _Memorial Edition of the Works of Theodore Roosevelt_, XIV, 245 Esse quam videre, Kevin Alfred Strom. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
I have an old Reader's Digest book here which has a bunch of articles
pertaining to World War Two.One of the articles is about how U.S.Navy ''rehearsed'' the attack on Pearl Harbor a few years before the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor.There were some Japs who saw how U.S.Navy did that. Paul Gallo is on vacation this week.Chris McDonald (Certified Public Account) is hosting the Paul Gallo radio talk show.Right now, Chris is talking to Dr.David Kizer (spelling, Kiezer?) about Iraq and Afghanistan and the murder of J.F.Kennedy. cuhulin |
America's Marxist
On 18-Aug-2010, dave wrote: The United States of only 25 years ago cannot be reconstructed. Why would you want to? Savings and Loan collapse? Iran Contra? Crack epidemic? New Coke? Crack and stupid consumer offerings are irrelevant. The other 2 items you mention were irrelevant to the big, and economic, picture. 25 years ago, but even then diminishing, the U.S. was a major auto, steel, tools, dies, machinery, consumer goods producer. That's history. The name of the forum has economics as the 3rd word. That's why it's on topic. If you like crime, cultural pollution, unconstitutional government, Mexican and Islamic invasions and wages at early 70's rates, you should be happy! Things always look greener on the other side of the fence. I AM on the other side of the fence; you side looks like a carcass. |
America's Marxist
On 18-Aug-2010, First Post wrote: Economic Collapse of 2008~2016 TARP ! Obama-Care ! dave - not a "fact" just a 'feeling' . . . and to some 'feelings' are facts ~ RHF . If you are looking for a perfect America where such scandals and improprieties won't exist then you'll be waiting for the end of time because it will never happen. The one thing that we did not have in those decades past was a population that believed they were simply entitled to anything and everything and government was going to take away from one group in order to give to another. Until the citizens literally take back their country from the ****ing government you will see no change for the better. When Watergate happened everyone from the citizenry up through all ranks of government were ****ed and demanding action. If Watergate were to occur today (or another Waco or Iran Contra etc) porbably no one other than politicians would give a **** and only then because they could use such events to their own benefit. A large portion of the population today only care about one thing, "I'm gonna get mine". That was not the case 25 or 30 years back. Politicians have always been predominately crooked to one degree or another. But nowadays the people have become nearly as corrupt in their thinking as the politicians. As I stated here around 2 years ago, the people will elect the government they deserve. And they have. We have become a much more divided nation than we have been in decades and we now have a government that reflects it. Instead of the people being the bosses of the government the government now tells us what to think and how to feel. You gave examples of a lot of bad things that occured throughout the last 30 or so years but it should also be noted that in that same time period, as a people, we were better human beings than we are today. Then we tried to look out for our neighbors and it was common to see folks talking to each other over their fences and their children playing up and down the streets of their neighborhoods. 50 years ago people, whether successful at it or not, at least tried to live a "Leave It To Beaver" lifestyle. We would stop and help a stranded stranger on the side of the road and typically neither party had any reason to be fearful of the other. We had no problem throwing a few bucks into the salvation army bucket or at some other charity near the holidays. Nowadays we are generally afraid to even drive down the street without being safely locked in our cars, we are afraid to let our kids play together outside after school and we look at our neighbors that may have a little more than us with disdain. And instead of trying to live the American dream we now lazily say that "it's impossible to live a perfect life so **** it, may as well be an asshole." Indeed, we might possibly be much better off today if the people themselves had the same morals and outlooks on life that they had 30 or more years ago. If we did then maybe we would not be so quick to tolerate the type of bull**** that we've had to put up with for the last 25 years. Thanks! I feel like the Cavalry has arrived! |
America's Marxist
|
America's Marxist
On 18-Aug-2010, dave wrote: Dave for some/many it is just a 'feeling' that America was better back then in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and even up to the 1990s. You can't fix the future by disrespecting it. The '80s sucked. The '60s sucked. The '70s was probably the high water mark for this country. Way off base re the 60's and 80's (mid 70's the demise began and 80's was the beginning of the high rate of the demise) but the 70's were the peak as far as output. It will only get worse from here on, in every conceivable measure. "Americans" must learn to live like the people in Peru, Cambodia and Albania. It's not sorrowful, it was good while it lasted. |
America's Marxist
On 18-Aug-2010, DEFCON 88 wrote: You can't fix the future by disrespecting it. The '80s sucked. The '60s sucked. The '70s was probably the high water mark for this country. Even though the 70's brought us (shudder) disco? AND THE END OF MINISKIRTS!!! |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 17-Aug-2010, Joe from Kokomo wrote: Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the military is hobbled by bedwetters. Well, it's just slightly possible that your half-baked theory of "the military is hobbled by bedwetters" is true, but then how would you explain the following? 1) In Iraq, the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites have been warring for hundreds of years. They still are. They still will be when we leave. Were they "hobbled by bedwetters"? No, that's who they are and attempting to change it was moronic. The bedwetters sacrificed thousands of the most honorable individuals in the U.S. to achieve futility. 2) In Afghanistan, ANY and ALL occupiers over the last THOUSAND years, from Genghis Khan to the Russians, have been thrown out. Were the Russkies and Genghis all hobbled by bedwetters too? No, they tired what the U.S. ignorantly tried - to change a culture. That's impossible, the same as it's now impossible to bring back the United States. Or did that moron Bush put us in to two totally unwinnable situations? Moron Bush put us in to two totally un winnable situations, and at the same time (starting during Clinton's tenure) importing the problem at U.S. taxpayer expense. Nice theory of yours, but it might behoove you to brush up a bit on your world history. Bedwetters cannot win a war. Iraq and Afghanistan and Iraq were not wars except for the first couple weeks. IF the U.S. wanted to overpower these ********s, they could have, but it would have taken a serious offensive (WWII style) which the U.S. will never again have the balls to do. As much as it may frustrate you, we agree. Neither should have happened. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 17-Aug-2010, Joe from Kokomo wrote: I closed 2 plants when industrial output hit the skids, in 2004 and 2005. I now produce overseas and you clowns pay through the ass for very inexpensively made merchandise. I cannot change the U.S. because 98% of "Americans" don't give a flying rats ass nor are they willing to participate in correcting the debacle. It's your, or you kids problem. You may be right that we "pay through the ass for very inexpensively made merchandise"...but that merchandise is STILL cheaper (waaay cheaper) than stuff made in the USA. The market sets the price, not the producers. You're paying what the market will bear and as much as the sellers can get. Diminishing wages (via diminishing output) is what diminishes wages. Not so much as people "not giving a flying rat's ass" as much as it is that people, many without jobs want, nay, need "cheap" merchandise. They are acquiescing to shoddy junk that costs seemingly less, but then, now there's nothing to compare it to as produced in the U.S (for the majority of items) If the American sheeple ever wake up and get wise, watch out! There won't be enough tar and feathers for politicians of either stripe. You can only dream that will happen - it NEVER will. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 18-Aug-2010, dave wrote: If the American sheeple ever wake up and get wise, watch out! There won't be enough tar and feathers for politicians of either stripe. That train has left the barn door open. They cleaned us out. We are now a colony of the Chinese. ...and Japan and Korea and India...but only because "Americans" will settle for that. If you want to see an economic revolution, everyone stop buying Chinese, Japanese and Korean for JUST 90 DAYS - ships will back up at sea, (Japan and Korea might even "allow" U.S. products into their countries) chaos will rein with the producers, a market will be born for domestic products and employment and wage levels of 30 years ago will return and RISE. Nawwwww...Obama will send the ignorant masses 300 bucks and all will continue as is. Was great while it lasted!! |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
On Aug 19, 9:05*am, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote: [...] Of the terrible days of the so-called Reconstruction period, Wilson wrote: "It was a menace to society itself that the negroes should thus of a sudden be set free and left without tutelage or restraint.... The country filled with vagrants, looking for pleasure and gratuitous fortune. Idleness bred want, as always, and the vagrants turned thieves or inopportune beggars. The tasks of ordinary labor stood untouched; the idlers grew insolent, dangerous; nights went anxiously by, for fear of riot and incendiary fire. [...] Sounds just like large areas of Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Atlanta, etc. LOL! |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
Yeah, Miniskirts.Miniskirts on them wimmins need to make a comeback.
http://www.realmenwearkilts.com cuhulin |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
Don't get lost in a fool's fog.
http://www.rense.com/general91/axed.htm democraps and libturds are lost in a fool's fog. cuhulin |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... (Japan and Korea might even "allow" U.S. products into their countries) Can't speak for Japan, since I've only spent a few weeks over there, but Korea is awash in US products from toilet paper to coffee to fast food to automobiles. Of course more people buy Korean products, but I'd have to guess that at least 10% of the economy here involves US brands and products (and that is not counting the US military presence.) |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
More Buicks are sold in China than anywhere else.They have a Buick
factory in China too. Foreign Diplomats Evacuate Moscow http://www.rense.com It is a HOT time in Russia. cuhulin |
(OT) : America's Marxist / More Democrat Inconvenient Truths
On 19-Aug-2010, DEFCON 88 wrote: sudden be set free and left without tutelage or restraint.... The country filled with vagrants, looking for pleasure and gratuitous fortune. Idleness bred want, as always, and the vagrants turned thieves or inopportune beggars. The tasks of ordinary labor stood untouched; the idlers grew insolent, dangerous; nights went anxiously by, for fear of riot and incendiary fire. [...] Sounds just like large areas of Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Atlanta, etc. LOL! Sounds like the United States in any population center larger than 5,000 people. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 19-Aug-2010, "Brenda Ann" wrote: (Japan and Korea might even "allow" U.S. products into their countries) Can't speak for Japan, since I've only spent a few weeks over there, but Korea is awash in US products from toilet paper to coffee to fast food to automobiles. Of course more people buy Korean products, but I'd have to guess that at least 10% of the economy here involves US brands and products (and that is not counting the US military presence.) If U.S. auto's are in Korea, it must have heppend in the past 3 years. My last visit was for a month teaching Hyundai/Kia some new technologies. In a month, I saw 5 U.S. vehicles. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
Before World War Two, there was a Chevrolet factory and also a Harley
Davidson factory in China, I have an old auto magazine article here about that.Currently, there is a Harley Davidson factory near Shanghai,China. Henry Ford had Ford factories around the World, building Model T Ford cars.I have an old hard back Ford book here about that. America has many factories around the World, and has had many factories around the World for many, many years. cuhulin |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
They won't build it! Hardhats vow not to work on mosque near Ground Zero
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=294483 cuhulin |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 20-Aug-2010, "Brenda Ann" wrote: last visit was for a month teaching Hyundai/Kia some new technologies. In a month, I saw 5 U.S. vehicles. I've been here for 10 years, and travel almost every day throughout the country. On the expressways I would guess easily 10% of the cars are US makes, another 1-2% are Japanese. Lots of Chryslers (mostly PT Cruisers, which seem to be very popular), Chevrolets (mostly vans and SUV's). Other foreign cars that are very popular here are Mini Coopers and BMW's. For the most part, for small cars they stick with domestic because of price and easy parts availability. Conversely, most of the US military drive Korean vehicles, mostly small cars for POV's, and the military fleets are mostly SSangYong and KIA. That's good to hear - they must be allowed now so the U.S. will continue to defend them when the North gets frisky. SsangYong is an interesting company - did seminars for them too. They build and export with Mercedes nameplates, but they're Korean 100%. (Not touted as Mercedes, just with the logos.) |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
On 20-Aug-2010, Roy Carin wrote: Was great while it lasted!! Once again, you hit the nail on the head. Every time we get our arses kicked for doing something stupid, the government uses more socialism to cover its arse, and the policies that lead our civilization to destruction don't change. That's why I explain there is no recession - just a change in core economic structure. Highly-vertically integrated production won't return to the United States for generations, if ever. Lifestyles must be lowered. Severe deflation, painful but necessary, would level the playing field with "developing" countries, but it has to be controlled and planned, not accidental. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
rense.com and stevequayle.com have an article about a Solar Storm with
the power of one hundren million H Bombs hitting Planet Earth in 2012,,, or 2013,,,, or whenever, if ever. There aints nuttin but nuttin worth watching on tee vee right now, not even Tom & Jerry (always worth watching) is on the cartoon channel right now.Might as well watch Modern Marvels on the History channel. cuhulin |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 20-Aug-2010, Roy wrote: Was great while it lasted!! Once again, you hit the nail on the head. Every time we get our arses kicked for doing something stupid, the government uses more socialism to cover its arse, and the policies that lead our civilization to destruction don't change. That's why I explain there is no recession - just a change in core economic structure. Highly-vertically integrated production won't return to the United States for generations, if ever. Lifestyles must be lowered. Severe deflation, painful but necessary, would level the playing field with "developing" countries, but it has to be controlled and planned, not accidental. It's OK. Disease will kill off 2/3 of the world's population in the next 15-20 years. |
Video: America's First Marxist President?
|
(OT) : The New and Improved Obama-Vaccine© Guaranteed To Prevent . . .
On Aug 27, 7:47*pm, dave wrote:
Colonel Kurtz wrote: On 20-Aug-2010, Roy *wrote: Was great while it lasted!! Once again, you hit the nail on the head. Every time we get our arses kicked for doing something stupid, the government uses more socialism to cover its arse, and the policies that lead our civilization to destruction don't change. That's why I explain there is no recession - just a change in core economic structure. Highly-vertically integrated production won't return to the United States for generations, if ever. *Lifestyles must be lowered. *Severe deflation, painful but necessary, would level the playing field with "developing" countries, but it has to be controlled and planned, not accidental. - It's OK. Disease will kill off 2/3 of the world's - population in the next 15-20 years. Dave care to be one of the first to do a personal demonstration . . . Step right-up and take the new and improved Obama-Vaccine© Guaranteed to Prevent the long-term effects of : Hate, Racism, Want, Poverty, Hunger, Sickness and Capitalism . . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edQNjJZFdLU and the only side effect is that you are certain to die 72 hours after the injection ~ RHF |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com