![]() |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
eBay item: 170526253934
dxAce Michigan USA |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:37:25 -0400, dxAce
wrote: eBay item: 170526253934 dxAce Michigan USA Not the most sensitive receiver but it had excellent digital filters for its time. Very low distortion and great audio quality. Guess they gave up on the KWZ-50. Anyone heard anything? Jim |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
|
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of
handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
On Aug 14, 2:12*pm, dxAce wrote:
DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf Yes, that's it. Thanks! |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
dxAce wrote:
DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf A DSP synchronous detector. The K3 has one. |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
On Aug 14, 4:27*pm, bm wrote:
On 14 Aug, 20:24, DEFCON 88 wrote: On Aug 14, 2:12*pm, dxAce wrote: DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf Yes, that's it. Thanks! The KWZ-30's audio quality is the best I've encountered on any HF receiver. And I've had a few. And their Auto Notch function is second to none - totally transparent when selected, and with practically no effect on recovered audio quality. Bjarne Mjelde Berlevag, Arctic Norway Are they still in business? The last time I tried to visit their website, it was gone! Steve |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
On Aug 15, 3:25*pm, Steve wrote:
On Aug 14, 4:27*pm, bm wrote: On 14 Aug, 20:24, DEFCON 88 wrote: On Aug 14, 2:12*pm, dxAce wrote: DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf Yes, that's it. Thanks! The KWZ-30's audio quality is the best I've encountered on any HF receiver. And I've had a few. And their Auto Notch function is second to none - totally transparent when selected, and with practically no effect on recovered audio quality. Bjarne Mjelde Berlevag, Arctic Norway Are they still in business? The last time I tried to visit their website, it was gone! Steve- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The website seems to be out,indeed. |
KWZ 30 Kneisner & Doering Receiver
On 14 Aug, 20:24, DEFCON wrote: On Aug 14, 2:12 pm, wrote: DEFCON 88 wrote: I recall reading somewhere that the KWZ-30 had a unique method of handling AM signal fading. It wasn't synchronous detection but something else. Does anyone remember what it was? See page 13 here where it mentions the AM demodulator, that may be it: http://www.mwcircle.org/docs/receivers/kwz30.pdf That requires a lot of processing power. It would follow that latency would be high. If you're using WWV as a time standard for something requiring very high precision, it would require a correction step. Still, that's a pretty clever way of doing it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com