On 8/30/10 18:38 , Clave wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 8/30/10 15:27 , Clave wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...

...

But it's been historically useful to substitute name calling for
actual
dialogue about an issue....to decry an opponent of not worthy of
engaging
by attaching a name to him/her.

Which is where we are, today.

It's where any ignoramus who calls the Nazis "Socialists" is today.

Thank you for underscoring my point.

That you're a political illiterate? You hardly needed my help for that.

But you're welcome, I guess.


Again. Name calling rather than addressing the discussion.

That would suggest not only a weak argument, but an inadequacy of
weilding it.

That is assuming that you HAD an argument.

So far, you've only shown your bluster.

Have a good evening, Jim.


P