why we need more stronger gun control
 

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:03:11 -0500, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

Guns don't kill. School children do.

School children don't often make death threats.

Trolls often do.

That one has been known.

--
Humbug

Idiot's-R-Us : All Americans Are Killers-by-proxy . . .
 

On Oct 17, 8:39*pm, wrote:
On Oct 17, 5:21*pm, RHF wrote:



On Oct 17, 5:40*am, dave wrote:

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

All so-called civilized people are violence prone.

I don't recall that being true of my grandmother, but perhaps you know
better.

- If she pays taxes she kills people.

'Special Dave',

Sort of like the analogy of a friend of mine 'Carl'
who worked for the DoN {DOD} and said that he
was not a Killer-by-proxy -but- The Farmer who
grew the Wheat; that make the Bread; that the
Soldier Ate was a Killer-by-proxy.

Conclusion : All Americans Are Killers-by-proxy
unless they moved to Canada in the 1960s . . .

- - Even Canada supplied the USA with 'essential'
- - War Materials to aid in Killing of the Peoples of
- - 'other' Nations around the World : And Today
- - Canada is a Willing and Contributing Partner in
- - many of the USA's Wars in so-called 'Zones of
- - Conflict'. : A lot of Scotch and Irish Ancestral
-corrrection-
Warriors {Martial Peoples} live in Canada.


i dutifully pay my taxes and
i proudly support our troops ~ RHF
*.
-ps- tyvm canada
*.
*.

- *ex-Marital people are loosers.
- They get raped by the unfair court system...

Oops typing too fast and got the 'i' in front of the 't' :
Martial Peoples -aka- Martial Race ~ RHF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_Race

OT Hiring a hit man makes you less brutal?
 

Somebody Somewhere wrote:
On Oct 17, 8:40 am, wrote:
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

All so-called civilized people are violence prone.

I don't recall that being true of my grandmother, but perhaps you know
better.

If she pays taxes she kills people.


(rolls eyes) ... Grow up, will ya?

What is that supposed to mean? Is she not responsible for what her
government does in her name with her money?

why we need more stronger gun control
 

On 10/17/2010 4:46 PM, Humbug wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:03:11 -0500, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

Guns don't kill. School children do.

School children don't often make death threats.

Trolls often do.

That one has been known.


What? Threat? Hell, that is no threat, you crawl though my window--you
get shot. You mug me, break into my safe, grab my wallet, threaten me
with a knife, baseball bat, etc.--YOU GET SHOT!

Let the jury decide if it was a threat, or NOT!

Regards,
JS

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,Family and Home"
 

On Oct 18, 12:51*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 10/17/2010 4:46 PM, Humbug wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:03:11 -0500, Dillon Pyron
*wrote:

Guns don't kill. *School children do.

School children don't often make death threats.

Trolls often do.

That one has been known.

- What? *Threat? *Hell, that is no threat, you crawl though my window--
you
- get shot. *You mug me, break into my safe, grab my wallet, threaten
me
- with a knife, baseball bat, etc.--YOU GET SHOT!
-
- Let the jury decide if it was a threat, or NOT!
-
- Regards,
- JS

JS,
There should be NO Jury .
There should be NO Trial .
There should be NO Charge .
There should be NO Crime .
IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]

We need an Initiative in the State of California
"The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
Family and Home"
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ball...initiative.htm

* Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

+ Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.

CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.

Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.

DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.

-example-
Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.

yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,Family and Home"
 

On Oct 18, 6:09*pm, RHF wrote:
On Oct 18, 12:51*pm, John Smith wrote: On 10/17/2010 4:46 PM, Humbug wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:03:11 -0500, Dillon Pyron
*wrote:

Guns don't kill. *School children do.

School children don't often make death threats.

Trolls often do.

That one has been known.

- What? *Threat? *Hell, that is no threat, you crawl though my window--
you
- get shot. *You mug me, break into my safe, grab my wallet, threaten
me
- with a knife, baseball bat, etc.--YOU GET SHOT!
-
- Let the jury decide if it was a threat, or NOT!
-
- Regards,
- JS

JS,
There should be NO Jury .
There should be NO Trial .
There should be NO Charge .
There should be NO Crime .
IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]

We need an Initiative in the State of California
"The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
Family and Home"http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/how-to-qualify-an-ini...

* Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

+ Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.

CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.

Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.

DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.

-example-
Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.

yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF
*.

Have you thought about actually studying English?

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self, Family and Home"
 

On Oct 18, 6:09 pm, RHF wrote:
JS,
There should be NO Jury .
There should be NO Trial .
There should be NO Charge .
There should be NO Crime .
IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]

We need an Initiative in the State of California
"The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
Family and
Home"http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/how-to-qualify-an-ini...

* Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

+ Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.

CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.

Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.

DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.

-example-
Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.

yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF

Roy,

Aside from the fact that you're nuts....

If such a law existed (minus the lunacy about shooting someone who smokes in
your house.. that would never in a million years fly..), it would be too
easy to abuse it, ie if you wanted to kill someone and get away with it, all
you would have to do is make sure they were in your house under any pretense
and blow them away.

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,Family and Home"
 

On 10/18/2010 5:37 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:

...
Roy,

Aside from the fact that you're nuts....

If such a law existed (minus the lunacy about shooting someone who
smokes in your house.. that would never in a million years fly..), it
would be too easy to abuse it, ie if you wanted to kill someone and get
away with it, all you would have to do is make sure they were in your
house under any pretense and blow them away.


Do you own a gun? Can you use it well? Do you know when to shoot
someone, and when not to? Do you realize mentally ill people can and
quite possibly will attack you for no apparent reason? Do you realize
drugs can cause people to attack you for no apparent reason? Etc., etc.

If not: Do you own good stuff? Do you have children which can be
molested? Are you worth any money?

If yes, YOU NEED A GUN! If all that is not taken care of, YOU NEED
SOMEONE WITH A GUN TO BE AROUND TO PROTECT YOU!

Regards,
JS

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,...
 

Studying English? http://www.engrish.com

http://www.devilfinder.com
Obama is a Terrorist Billboard
cuhulin

Idiot's-R-Us : "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,Family and Home"
 

On Oct 18, 5:37*pm, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
On Oct 18, 6:09 pm, RHF wrote:
- - JS,
- - There should be NO Jury .
- - There should be NO Trial .
- - There should be NO Charge .
- - There should be NO Crime .
- - IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]
- -
- - We need an Initiative in the State of California
- - "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
- - Family and Home"
- - http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ball...qualify-an-ini....
- -
- - * Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
- - and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - * Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
- - No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - * Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
- - and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - + Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
- - Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.
- -
- - CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
- - Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
- - Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.
- -
- - Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.
- -
- - DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.
- -
- - -example-
- - Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
- - It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.
- -
- - yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
- - and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF
- - .

- Roy,
-
- Aside from the fact that you're nuts....

BAD - That's California . . . the so-called :
Land of Fruits and Nuts ! ;;-}}

- If such a law existed (minus the lunacy about
- shooting someone who smokes in your house..

BAD - So all the crap-o-la about Second-Hand-Smoke*
KILLS is just crap-o-la . . .
* Poisonous Toxic Gas
* * Second-Hand-Smoke a Public Health Hazard
* * Second-Hand-Smoke an Assault On Your Lungs
* * Second-Hand-Smoke Dangerous to New Babies,
Young Children, the Elderly and Infirmed , etc etc etc.

- that would never in a million years fly..),

BAD - Only tales 500K Signatures at 25 Cents to
a $1 per Signature is needed to get it On-the-Ballot.
-and- 'If' it were On-the-Ballot : I would expect that
way-more-than 55% would Vote For It and make it
a California State Human-Right and CA State LAW.

- it would be too easy to abuse it,

BAD
that it would,,,
That It Would...
THAT IT WOULD ! ! !
But It would also give Peace-of-Mind to a Home
Owner {Apartment Renter} that is being broken
into by a 3-Strikes Convicted Burglar/Robber.

- ie if you wanted to kill someone and get away
- with it, all you would have to do is make sure
- they were in your house under any pretense
- and blow them away.

BAD - Bang ! you got that right - band bang ~ RHF