http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f3b_1286227189

passer-buy walks into shop and cuts customers throat with a knife.
Then next thing he
trys to stab guy behind counter. A fight starts then a cow-orker
comes out to help. guy behind counter pulls out big gun and shoots
victim who falls to ground with horrific injuerys. Now this guy behind
the counter was concluisvly shown in the video to have a gun ready to
assualt somebody. He was ALREADY really and willing to fire a gun
point-blank into another human. in other words the guy was looking for
a EXCUSE to fire a gun at another human; probably even chose his
career to increase the liklihood that he could be in a situation where
he could hopt to get away with shooting someone. our laws dont cover
loopholes like these and so why I fully support greater gun control
measures.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Help reign in capitalism"s rampage; Vote http://greens.org

On 10/10/2010 3:22 PM, Peter Lucas wrote:

...

EVERYONE in the US should have to go though a gun ownership, use,
operation, handling class in high school. They should be required to
own a gun and maintain it in proper operating condition. The government
should conduct inspections, every year or so, and anyone not having a
gun, or not maintaining it in functioning condition, and ready for use
should be fined ... after sufficient warnings, if they are still not
complaint, they should be jailed for a period of time to get their
attention on the importance of maintaining their weapon(s.)

Get real ...

Regards,
JS

On Oct 10, 4:31*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 10/10/2010 3:22 PM, Peter Lucas wrote:

* ...

- EVERYONE in the US should have to go though a gun ownership, use,
- operation, handling class in high school. *They should be required
to
- own a gun and maintain it in proper operating condition. *The
government
- should conduct inspections, every year or so, and anyone not having
a
- gun, or not maintaining it in functioning condition, and ready for
use
- should be fined ... after sufficient warnings, if they are still not
- complaint, they should be jailed for a period of time to get their
- attention on the importance of maintaining their weapon(s.)
-
- Get real ...
-
- Regards,
- JS

JS,

Each and Every Able-Bodied Law Abiding* US Citizen
Age 18~68 : Must Own and Maintain a Gun for the
Self-Defense of Family, Home and Community.
* Law that Clearly States NO Criminal Can Sue a
Citizen Acting in Defense of Family and Home.

Each and Every Able-Bodied US Citizen Age 28~38 :
Serves 90~120 Days as Local Armed {Shotgun} Police
Auxiliary : The Second or Third LEO* in the Car.
* Law that Clearly States NO Criminal Can Sue a LEO
That Is Reasonably Acting in Defense of the Community.

Exemption for Anti-Gun Citizens : Those that do not
'choose' to Own a Gun for Self-Defense of Family and
Home : Pay a 1% Tax Surcharge on their Property
and Income from Age 18~ 68 Years.

PUT "THE US CITIZEN" BACK-IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
AND PUT AN END TO CRIME : LAW ABIDING CITIZENS
HAVE RIGHTS : CRIMINALS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
SHOT FOR THEIR CRIMES [.] - so say i ~ RHF

http://www.devilfinder.com
Mississippi Castle Law

The Defiant Ones movie is crankin up on TCM.
Bowling Green! Sewing Machine!
cuhulin

wrote:
http://www.devilfinder.com
Mississippi Castle Law

The Defiant Ones movie is crankin up on TCM.
Bowling Green! Sewing Machine!
cuhulin


Boling Green was a person who moved from Carolina to Virginia in the
17th century.

Cartridges in, bullets out.Cartridge consist of shell, gunpowder,
primer, and bullet.
It isn't necessary to have a Firearm to shoot bullets.There are other
ways to do that, one of them I saw in Vietnam.
cuhulin

RHF wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, John wrote:
On 10/10/2010 3:22 PM, Peter Lucas wrote:

...

- EVERYONE in the US should have to go though a gun ownership, use,
- operation, handling class in high school.

High school age is too late.

On Oct 10, 6:11*pm, RHF wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:31*pm, John Smith wrote: On 10/10/2010 3:22 PM, Peter Lucas wrote:

* ...

- EVERYONE in the US should have to go though a gun ownership, use,
- operation, handling class in high school. *They should be required
to
- own a gun and maintain it in proper operating condition. *The
government
- should conduct inspections, every year or so, and anyone not having
a
- gun, or not maintaining it in functioning condition, and ready for
use
- should be fined ... after sufficient warnings, if they are still not
- complaint, they should be jailed for a period of time to get their
- attention on the importance of maintaining their weapon(s.)
-
- Get real ...
-
- Regards,
- JS

JS,

Each and Every Able-Bodied Law Abiding* US Citizen
Age 18~68 : Must Own and Maintain a Gun for the
Self-Defense of Family, Home and Community.
* Law that Clearly States NO Criminal Can Sue a
Citizen Acting in Defense of Family and Home.

Each and Every Able-Bodied US Citizen Age 28~38 :
Serves 90~120 Days as Local Armed {Shotgun} Police
Auxiliary : The Second or Third LEO* in the Car.
* Law that Clearly States NO Criminal Can Sue a LEO
That Is Reasonably Acting in Defense of the Community.

Exemption for Anti-Gun Citizens : Those that do not
'choose' to Own a Gun for Self-Defense of Family and
Home : Pay a 1% Tax Surcharge on their Property
and Income from Age 18~ 68 Years.

PUT "THE US CITIZEN" BACK-IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
AND PUT AN END TO CRIME : LAW ABIDING CITIZENS
HAVE RIGHTS : CRIMINALS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
SHOT FOR THEIR CRIMES [.] - so say i ~ RHF
*.
*.

Disgraceful. Nobody should be forced to do this if they don't want
to. Anyone tries to force me to do this, I'll shoot them.

On 10/11/2010 12:51 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

...
Disgraceful. Nobody should be forced to do this if they don't want
to. Anyone tries to force me to do this, I'll shoot them.

Oh, I wouldn't force anyone. The dummies which don't want to
participate might even wish to place a nice red sign on their doors
saying they don't own guns. That if someone wants to do a quick
smash-and-garb and fear no risk, that they invade those homes!

Hell, I am all for it. It will keep the crooks away from mine--better
they busy themselves with idiots, where they won't get hurt!

Regards,
JS

On Oct 11, 1:18*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:51 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

...
Disgraceful. *Nobody should be forced to do this if they don't want
to. *Anyone tries to force me to do this, I'll shoot them.

Oh, I wouldn't force anyone. *The dummies which don't want to
participate might even wish to place a nice red sign on their doors
saying they don't own guns. *That if someone wants to do a quick
smash-and-garb and fear no risk, that they invade those homes!

Hell, I am all for it. *It will keep the crooks away from mine--better
they busy themselves with idiots, where they won't get hurt!

Regards,
JS

You really do wax hot and cold, don't you?