On Nov 11, 1:20*pm, RHF wrote:
On Nov 11, 9:56*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

What's interesting about them is that some are real experimenters
and run transmitters with superb fidelity, some sounding better than
commercial broadcast stations.

When are HAMs going to start hacking the iBiquity codec
and going HD-IBOC?
Would be more interesting than some of the ego power trips on 80m.

I would think that HAMs would try an adapt
to and use DRM Transmission versus IBOC.

DRM is Direct Digital and more efficient for
one-to-one direct communications.

IBOC is a Hybrid Analog/Digital and is only
valuable as a backwardly compatible System
for Transitioning from Analog to Digital.

~ RHF
*.

Voice communications are vulgar.

On Nov 11, 12:40*pm, Steve wrote:
On Nov 11, 1:20*pm, RHF wrote:



On Nov 11, 9:56*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

What's interesting about them is that some are real experimenters
and run transmitters with superb fidelity, some sounding better than
commercial broadcast stations.

When are HAMs going to start hacking the iBiquity codec
and going HD-IBOC?
Would be more interesting than some of the ego power trips on 80m.

I would think that HAMs would try an adapt
to and use DRM Transmission versus IBOC.

DRM is Direct Digital and more efficient for
one-to-one direct communications.

IBOC is a Hybrid Analog/Digital and is only
valuable as a backwardly compatible System
for Transitioning from Analog to Digital.

~ RHF
*.

- Voice communications are vulgar.

Most "Voice Communications" are in the 'vulgar'.

'language' the code-of-sounds transmitted
by the human voice conveying meaning ~ RHF©

On 10-11-11 02:10 PM, RHF wrote:

- Voice communications are vulgar.

Most "Voice Communications" are in the 'vulgar'.


The word is 'vulgate'. It's Latin for 'the common language' or the
language of the masses. Vulgar is a derivation, meaning 'common' or of
the lower classes.




mike