Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/13/2010 10:36 AM, dave wrote:
Herbert Visser wrote: experimental bent. Very few AM hams are running stock commercial gear; usually, at the very least, it is modified for better quality audio. Better than Collins tube gear? How? Stock KW-1s and 32Vs have fairly narrow "communications quality" audio with middling distortion, though not as bad as some other manufacturers. The experimental AM crowd often strives for audio far, far beyond that -- trying to achieve HF audio several degrees better than, say, KHJ's in its golden days. Some are successful. In short: lower distortion at higher modulation densities; enhanced frequency response despite the limitations of the medium; maintaining excellent intelligibility while retaining high perceived quality; and that indefinable something that makes for appealing, beautiful sound. With every good wish, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1991 Shortwave guide - how many still exist today?? | Shortwave | |||
Thus it exist ? | Antenna | |||
QSL cards still exist! | Shortwave | |||
why this newsgroup should not exist.. | CB | |||
Do these things exist? | Homebrew |