RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/157317-stop-fcc-media-marxist-internet-takeover.html)

dave December 28th 10 03:15 AM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
19% of eligible voters is never a tidal wave, 'cept maybe in your
bathtub. The only lesson from November is that the Supreme Court needs
some impeaching. Corporations are not people and money only equals
speech at a whore house.

Tim Crowley December 28th 10 03:15 AM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On Dec 27, 7:12*pm, Werner wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:58*pm, John Smith wrote:





On 12/27/2010 4:35 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:


...
government agenda.


http://BigGovernment.com/pkerpen/201...st-stop-fccs-i....


http://StopNetRegulation.org


Seems most don't realize they will soon be licensing you to be able to
have a spot on the internet, perhaps even contract with an ISP.


Seems most don't realize they will soon need a permit/license to travel
... this is what the TSA is doing in your airports, and soon will be in
you train depots, buses, even Walmarts ...


Seems most don't realize, under the new food and safety bill, you will
soon need to be licensed to grow and sell vegetables from a garden ...


The attack is on many fronts ... and the ignorant masses are asleep. *If
they knew what this translates into, they would all be joining state
militias and purchasing weapons ...


Regards,
JS


Resistance to obedience does seem to be on the rise. Civil
disobedience is a better option.


Buahahahahahahahahahah.

hint: you'll do nothing but spam hate - anonymously of course. When
it comes time to stand up. you'll run like the cowardly kkkunt you
are.


John Smith December 28th 10 03:18 AM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On 12/27/2010 7:05 PM, Werner wrote:

...
Why the exception? If it offends you simply don't click on it.


Because, it harbors great dangers, most child molesters, rapists, sex
murders, etc. have lots of such materials around. Reading back though
any number of articles on such criminals being apprehended, you will
notice they all revolve around this one trait ... even the recent
molester for TSA, frisking women and children at airports, had loads on
his computer.

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r/26165594/detail.html

The Constitution guarantees you no right to be a danger to others ...
simply put, your rights end trump when they bump into anothers'. Until
then, you should be granted freedom ... with speech, it can be summed up
simply, "I may differ with what you say, never your right to say it."
However, if you yell FIRE! in a theater, you endanger others and their
right to safety ... the supreme court used to be able to make such
judgments, rationally, they no longer seem capable.

Regards,
JS

RHF December 28th 10 06:04 AM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On Dec 27, 5:23*pm, "Clave" wrote:
"Chas. Chan" wrote in message

...



Network neutrality (also known by the even more lovely sounding
marketing term “open Internet”) is an outgrowth of the larger so-
called media reform project...


- No it ****ing isn't.
-
- Jim

OMG ! - God Has Spoken . . .
An We Must Heed His Every Word -not- ~ RHF

RHF December 28th 10 06:18 AM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On Dec 27, 7:15*pm, dave wrote:
- 19% of eligible voters is never a tidal wave,
- 'cept maybe in your bathtub.

So 'Special-Dave' if your Darling Liberals Win
by a percent or two -it's-
THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE !

-but- 'Special-Dave' if your HATED Conservatives
should Win by Double-Digits -it's- FRAUD [.]

Just so much more "Facts Have A Liberal Bias"
from 'Special-Dave'. ~ RHF

dave December 28th 10 02:09 PM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On 12/27/2010 06:53 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2010 7:21 PM, dave wrote:

...
Don't let Glenn Beck hear you say that. He says "human rights" is a
commie plot.


Funny, he must have read the part, in the Constitution where the
forefathers mention them ...

Regards,
JS


How many occurrences of the word human in the Constitution?

[email protected] December 28th 10 02:31 PM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
I haven't seen any mobile guard towers around here,,, yet, or drones
buzzing around either.Sometimes WLBT 3's Skycopter 3 (keeping track on
road traffic/auto accidents/whatever) Helicopter with Mary Wieden in
there giving us videos on tv news.Sometimes a police Helicopter looking
for somebody.
cuhulin


dave December 28th 10 02:39 PM

STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
 
On 12/27/2010 10:18 PM, RHF wrote:

.
- The only lesson from November is that the
- Supreme Court needs some impeaching.

'Special-Dave' you are such an 'imp'
and a real 'peach' too . . .
Tells Us 'Special-Dave' How Did The US Supreme
Court Factor into the November 2010 Elections...

By:
David Brooks
La Jornada

Four years ago, Warren Buffett, the third richest man on the planet,
said, "Of course there is a class war, but it's my class, the rich
class, that is waging the war, and we're winning."

This mid-term election in the United States is a front of the class war.
Business interests and the wealthy have declared war against anything
that dares to impose controls on them, limit their activities or touch
their fortunes, and they say so, explicitly and openly.

The vast majority of funds that are invested in what is already the most
expensive mid-term election in history (it is expected to exceed,
perhaps by far, 3.5 billion dollars) comes from billionaire donors,
companies and groups representing the wealthy class.

For example, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has invested some $75 million
in this election, almost all to support Republican candidates. In
January, Chamber president Thomas Donohue said his association intended
"to carry out the biggest and strongest voter-education effort and
promotion of issues in our nearly one-century-old history." He is
keeping his promise.

The organization American Crossroads, a project of Karl Rove, former
campaign and political strategist for George W. Bush, receives donations
of up to one million dollars from wealthy donors to support conservative
candidates across the country.

Multinational companies channel funds through these organizations (using
laws that allow them to conceal the identity of some donors) to promote
their corporate agendas to weaken government control over their
operations, the impact of health reform, efforts to curb the change in
climate and other things considered "anti-business" that inhibit
business. They also promote policies that favor "free enterprise" and
"free trade."

Many companies take advantage of a recent decision by the Supreme
Court of the United States (known as the Citizens United case) that gave
companies the same rights of "freedom of expression" enjoyed by
individuals. Through this decision, they can fund propaganda for or
against candidates to promote their agenda.

That ruling maintained that "independent expenditures" made by companies
in the electoral debate "do not lead to corruption or the appearance of
corruption" and though they "can generate influence on, or access to,
elected officials, that does not imply that these officials are corrupt.
And the appearance of influence or access will not cause voters to lose
faith in this democracy."

This was denounced as a serious abuse of the democratic process by
champions of electoral reforms who seek to reduce the influence of money
in elections.

RHF December 28th 10 11:12 PM

'Special-Dave's "US Constitution" -minus- 'Human's ;;-}}
 
On Dec 28, 6:09*am, dave wrote:
On 12/27/2010 06:53 PM, John Smith wrote:

On 12/27/2010 7:21 PM, dave wrote:


...


- - - Don't let Glenn Beck hear you say that.
- - - He says "human rights" is a commie plot.

Second Request -to- 'Special-Dave' :
Please "cite" your Source for this statement . . .
"He says "human rights" is a commie plot."
-or- Is this just more 'Special-Dave' making-up
"Facts Have {Having/With} A Liberal BIAS" ???
~t~w~i~s~t~i~n~g~ what people say {lies}
to suit his distorted liberal political agenda

RHF December 28th 10 11:17 PM

Ban All Guns ? -or- Execute A Few Killers !
 
On Dec 28, 1:25*pm, Dacato wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:18*pm, John Smith wrote: On 12/27/2010 7:05 PM, Werner wrote:

...
Why the exception? If it offends you simply don't click on it.


Because, it harbors great dangers, most child molesters, rapists, sex
murders, etc. have lots of such materials around. *Reading back though
any number of articles on such criminals being apprehended, you will
notice they all revolve around this one trait ... even the recent
molester for TSA, frisking women and children at airports, had loads on
his computer.


- Guns harbor great dangers too.
- Many thieves, rapists and murderers
- have many guns available.
- A lot of them have one trait too.
- The love of guns.
- I think we should just ban guns too!

-or- We Could Ban Thieves, Rapists and Murderers To
Prisons -or- 'Just' Removal For Cause {Death Sentence}.

Ban All Guns ? -or- Execute A Few Killers ! ~ RHF


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com