![]() |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
19% of eligible voters is never a tidal wave, 'cept maybe in your
bathtub. The only lesson from November is that the Supreme Court needs some impeaching. Corporations are not people and money only equals speech at a whore house. |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On Dec 27, 7:12*pm, Werner wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:58*pm, John Smith wrote: On 12/27/2010 4:35 PM, Chas. Chan wrote: ... government agenda. http://BigGovernment.com/pkerpen/201...st-stop-fccs-i.... http://StopNetRegulation.org Seems most don't realize they will soon be licensing you to be able to have a spot on the internet, perhaps even contract with an ISP. Seems most don't realize they will soon need a permit/license to travel ... this is what the TSA is doing in your airports, and soon will be in you train depots, buses, even Walmarts ... Seems most don't realize, under the new food and safety bill, you will soon need to be licensed to grow and sell vegetables from a garden ... The attack is on many fronts ... and the ignorant masses are asleep. *If they knew what this translates into, they would all be joining state militias and purchasing weapons ... Regards, JS Resistance to obedience does seem to be on the rise. Civil disobedience is a better option. Buahahahahahahahahahah. hint: you'll do nothing but spam hate - anonymously of course. When it comes time to stand up. you'll run like the cowardly kkkunt you are. |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On 12/27/2010 7:05 PM, Werner wrote:
... Why the exception? If it offends you simply don't click on it. Because, it harbors great dangers, most child molesters, rapists, sex murders, etc. have lots of such materials around. Reading back though any number of articles on such criminals being apprehended, you will notice they all revolve around this one trait ... even the recent molester for TSA, frisking women and children at airports, had loads on his computer. http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r/26165594/detail.html The Constitution guarantees you no right to be a danger to others ... simply put, your rights end trump when they bump into anothers'. Until then, you should be granted freedom ... with speech, it can be summed up simply, "I may differ with what you say, never your right to say it." However, if you yell FIRE! in a theater, you endanger others and their right to safety ... the supreme court used to be able to make such judgments, rationally, they no longer seem capable. Regards, JS |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On Dec 27, 5:23*pm, "Clave" wrote:
"Chas. Chan" wrote in message ... Network neutrality (also known by the even more lovely sounding marketing term “open Internet”) is an outgrowth of the larger so- called media reform project... - No it ****ing isn't. - - Jim OMG ! - God Has Spoken . . . An We Must Heed His Every Word -not- ~ RHF |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On Dec 27, 7:15*pm, dave wrote:
- 19% of eligible voters is never a tidal wave, - 'cept maybe in your bathtub. So 'Special-Dave' if your Darling Liberals Win by a percent or two -it's- THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE ! -but- 'Special-Dave' if your HATED Conservatives should Win by Double-Digits -it's- FRAUD [.] Just so much more "Facts Have A Liberal Bias" from 'Special-Dave'. ~ RHF |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On 12/27/2010 06:53 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2010 7:21 PM, dave wrote: ... Don't let Glenn Beck hear you say that. He says "human rights" is a commie plot. Funny, he must have read the part, in the Constitution where the forefathers mention them ... Regards, JS How many occurrences of the word human in the Constitution? |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
I haven't seen any mobile guard towers around here,,, yet, or drones
buzzing around either.Sometimes WLBT 3's Skycopter 3 (keeping track on road traffic/auto accidents/whatever) Helicopter with Mary Wieden in there giving us videos on tv news.Sometimes a police Helicopter looking for somebody. cuhulin |
STOP The FCC Media Marxist Internet Takeover
On 12/27/2010 10:18 PM, RHF wrote:
. - The only lesson from November is that the - Supreme Court needs some impeaching. 'Special-Dave' you are such an 'imp' and a real 'peach' too . . . Tells Us 'Special-Dave' How Did The US Supreme Court Factor into the November 2010 Elections... By: David Brooks La Jornada Four years ago, Warren Buffett, the third richest man on the planet, said, "Of course there is a class war, but it's my class, the rich class, that is waging the war, and we're winning." This mid-term election in the United States is a front of the class war. Business interests and the wealthy have declared war against anything that dares to impose controls on them, limit their activities or touch their fortunes, and they say so, explicitly and openly. The vast majority of funds that are invested in what is already the most expensive mid-term election in history (it is expected to exceed, perhaps by far, 3.5 billion dollars) comes from billionaire donors, companies and groups representing the wealthy class. For example, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has invested some $75 million in this election, almost all to support Republican candidates. In January, Chamber president Thomas Donohue said his association intended "to carry out the biggest and strongest voter-education effort and promotion of issues in our nearly one-century-old history." He is keeping his promise. The organization American Crossroads, a project of Karl Rove, former campaign and political strategist for George W. Bush, receives donations of up to one million dollars from wealthy donors to support conservative candidates across the country. Multinational companies channel funds through these organizations (using laws that allow them to conceal the identity of some donors) to promote their corporate agendas to weaken government control over their operations, the impact of health reform, efforts to curb the change in climate and other things considered "anti-business" that inhibit business. They also promote policies that favor "free enterprise" and "free trade." Many companies take advantage of a recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (known as the Citizens United case) that gave companies the same rights of "freedom of expression" enjoyed by individuals. Through this decision, they can fund propaganda for or against candidates to promote their agenda. That ruling maintained that "independent expenditures" made by companies in the electoral debate "do not lead to corruption or the appearance of corruption" and though they "can generate influence on, or access to, elected officials, that does not imply that these officials are corrupt. And the appearance of influence or access will not cause voters to lose faith in this democracy." This was denounced as a serious abuse of the democratic process by champions of electoral reforms who seek to reduce the influence of money in elections. |
'Special-Dave's "US Constitution" -minus- 'Human's ;;-}}
On Dec 28, 6:09*am, dave wrote:
On 12/27/2010 06:53 PM, John Smith wrote: On 12/27/2010 7:21 PM, dave wrote: ... - - - Don't let Glenn Beck hear you say that. - - - He says "human rights" is a commie plot. Second Request -to- 'Special-Dave' : Please "cite" your Source for this statement . . . "He says "human rights" is a commie plot." -or- Is this just more 'Special-Dave' making-up "Facts Have {Having/With} A Liberal BIAS" ??? ~t~w~i~s~t~i~n~g~ what people say {lies} to suit his distorted liberal political agenda |
Ban All Guns ? -or- Execute A Few Killers !
On Dec 28, 1:25*pm, Dacato wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:18*pm, John Smith wrote: On 12/27/2010 7:05 PM, Werner wrote: ... Why the exception? If it offends you simply don't click on it. Because, it harbors great dangers, most child molesters, rapists, sex murders, etc. have lots of such materials around. *Reading back though any number of articles on such criminals being apprehended, you will notice they all revolve around this one trait ... even the recent molester for TSA, frisking women and children at airports, had loads on his computer. - Guns harbor great dangers too. - Many thieves, rapists and murderers - have many guns available. - A lot of them have one trait too. - The love of guns. - I think we should just ban guns too! -or- We Could Ban Thieves, Rapists and Murderers To Prisons -or- 'Just' Removal For Cause {Death Sentence}. Ban All Guns ? -or- Execute A Few Killers ! ~ RHF |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com