RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Look who wants to quintuple funding for government media (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/157438-look-who-wants-quintuple-funding-government-media.html)

D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 3rd 11 06:37 PM

Republicans put car thief in charge of investigating Obama
 
On 1/3/11 12:36 , China Blue Ribbon wrote:

When someone claims the most corrupt adminstration, they don't get the benefit
of the doubt.



Thank God you're not an officer of the Court.



Beam Me Up Scotty[_3_] January 3rd 11 06:38 PM

Common-Sense-R-Us : Bring Fairness and Balance {Conservative-Equal-Air-Time}To NPR (CPB) In The 'Public Interest'
 
On 1/2/2011 11:25 AM, RHF wrote:
On Jan 1, 3:18 pm, dave wrote:
Your idea of "fairness" and "justice" is to IMPOSE YOUR idea of
"fairness" and "justice" by way of Liberal fascist government control
instead of the populace choosing what they wish to watch or listen via
the free and unfettered marketplace.


Do what you want on cable or satellite. The PUBLIC AIRWAVES belong to
everyone and it is ANTI-AMERICAN to allow them to be dominated by one
point of view. To me,



Where in the constitution is there something that says "equal press"
or "equal speech" when you find that just post it here and I will agree
with you. Until then, you are ****ing up a rope.

You and I have "free speech" and if you want to use it on any media, all
it takes is money. If you want free speech that costs zero then get soap
box and stand in the town square. The Air waves don't belong to this
Nation any more than Germany owns the airwaves, does the government also
own all the limited light waves?


Can the Government force you to turn off your lights, or force you to
share your light with someone that has no light?





D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 3rd 11 06:54 PM

Common-Sense-R-Us : Bring Fairness and Balance {Conservative-Equal-Air-Time}To NPR (CPB) In The 'Public Interest'
 
On 1/3/11 12:38 , Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

{preceding points stipulated}

Can the Government force you to turn off your lights, or force you to
share your light with someone that has no light?



Well, it's interesting you bring that up. The answer, is "yes."

Is it Constitutional, no. But they can do it.


Examples.

In Palm Beach, there are local ordinances with fines and other
penalties attached requiring ocean front property owners to turn
their lights off, and block indoor light from reaching outside the
building, to prevent turtle hatchlings from being attracted to away
from the sea to their deaths on land.

In the area where I live, ordinances, with fines and other
penalties attached, mandate that lights falling outside the property
line, security lights, coachlights, even your auto's headlights
while the vehicle is on the property, must be turned off.

On the other hand, in the event of a power failure, a local
community has an HOA that requires by covenant, with fines attached,
that homeowners, renters, or guests who are generator equipped must
share a minimum of 30% of their total continuous generating capacity
with homeowners, renters or guests, who are not generator equipped,
whether the owner of the generator can meet his/her own needs while
sharing, or not.

Your point about the Constitutional guarantee of Free Speech, and
the nature of Free Speech, is well made.

But, governments, local and otherwise, have few limits should
they desire to escape them.














[email protected] January 3rd 11 07:03 PM

Common-Sense-R-Us : Bring Fairness and Balance{Conservative-Eq...
 
You beat me to that one, D. Peter Maus.I was going to say, The fed govt
can do any damn thing they please, and they are getting away with it
too!

Mostly so, anyway.

The Russian Ten Planks.
cuhulin


[email protected] January 3rd 11 07:20 PM

Common-Sense-R-Us : Bring Fairness and Balance{Conservative-Eq...
 
You said it is snowing? Oh, dooooooo tellllll.
(she don't know anything) He looked outside, snowing EVERYWHERE!

Currently, 51 degrees inside my flowerbox on doggy's front porch, and
LOTS of Luverly SUNSHINE.

It's such a beautiful day todayyyyy,,,, look at the SUNSHINE,,,,,,,

Say cuzz, where is Devilfinder's (the search engine company) home base,
physical location? Only mildly wondering.

We got Close Encounters of the Third Kind crankin up right now on the
EDRA channel.
cuhulin


[email protected] January 3rd 11 07:39 PM

Common-Sense-R-Us : Bring Fairness and Balance{Conservative-Eq...
 
What Ayn Rand said.

http://www.devilfinder.com
There has never been a philosophy Ayn Rand

Also, devilfinder.com
Will Rogers Quotes
cuhulin


MnMikew January 3rd 11 07:55 PM

Republicans put car thief in charge of investigating Obama
 

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/04/2011 02:37 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/3/11 12:36 , China Blue Ribbon wrote:

When someone claims the most corrupt adminstration, they don't get the
benefit
of the doubt.



Thank God you're not an officer of the Court.



There is no God. If there was we'd be nuclear glass.

Where is Issa's brother? Is he being held incommunicado like Dan Quayle's
pot connection?


He's probably in jail.....for stealing cars....



[email protected] January 3rd 11 08:15 PM

Republicans put car thief in charge of investigating Obama
 
http://www.devilfinder.com
Dan Quayle didn't know how to spell Potato.

I spell it Potato, always have.
cuhulin


[email protected] January 3rd 11 09:42 PM

Republicans put car thief in charge of investigating Obama
 
http://www.devilfinder.com
Damaged Gulf Stream Affects Jet Stream

http://www.stevequayle.com/index1.html

Gulf Stream is BROKEN!
cuhulin


D Peter Maus[_2_] January 3rd 11 10:46 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/3/11 16:26 , wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:57:43 +0800, wrote:

There is no scarcity of light. The radio spectrum is part of the
commons, same as the air and the sidewalks downtown.


"WE' own that spectrum, and WE have determined that using OUR
"spectrum" for promotion of lies, distortion, slander and political
ignorance MUST be regulated.


If those are your criteria, then no political speech of any kind
would be permitted.

Here's the razor: The Constitutional guarantee of free speech is
specifically intended to protect speech which is not popular and/or is
critical of the leaders or political entities in or out of power.

This speech is guaranteed protection precisely BECAUSE it's not
popular, and/or critical of the political entities in or out of power.
Popular speech and/or supportive speech of those in power needs no
protection. Because it's popular. Because it's supportive of Power. And
the founding fathers, having escaped from a land where any speech on a
whim could be made a criminal offense, specifically sought to protect
the freedom by each citizen to speak his/her mind without fear of
retribution in both public or private venues.

To silence speech, for any political reason, is contrary to this
Constitutional guarantee.

Even if it's "promotion of lies, distortion, slander and political
ignorance."




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com