Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/9/2011 5:50 PM, dave wrote:
... No. That's close but not exactly correct. I never said it needs to evolve. I said it is intentionally vague and the definition of certain trick words like "unreasonable" change. You mean such truths as, "No change is needed to my right to free speech, freedom of religion, right to keep and bear arms, etc." If you, you are correct, it would be UNREASONABLE to attempt to weaken to take away any of the God given natural laws ... Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|