The BBC became a propaganda machine for climate change zealots
 

says Peter Sissons... and I was treated as a lunatic for daring to
dissent.

Institutionally biased to the Left, politically correct and with a
rudderless leadership. This is Peter Sissons’ highly critical view of
the BBC in his new memoirs, in which he describes his fascinating
career over four decades as a television journalist. Here, in the
latest part of our serialisation, he reveals how it was heresy at the
BBC to question claims about climate change...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...r-Sissons.html

The BBC became a propaganda machine for climate change zealots
 

On Jan 25, 7:33Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
says Peter Sissons... and I was treated as a lunatic for daring to
dissent.

Institutionally biased to the Left, politically correct and with a
rudderless leadership. This is Peter Sissons’ highly critical view of
the BBC in his new memoirs, in which he describes his fascinating
career over four decades as a television journalist. Here, in the
latest part of our serialisation, he reveals how it was heresy at the
BBC to question claims about climate change...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...paganda-machin...


It's heresy not to question it on Fox "News." Maybe it's the kook
right (and the energy interests for which it stands) that's full of
**** and not the rest of the planet. Maybe, just maybe, it's The Koch
Brothers and Republican party who are lying and bankrolling teams of
professional liars. Maybe it's not the scientific community at all.
Maybe it's not the rest of the world at all. Maybe it's you.

If hyperconservatism is the unvarnished voice of the American people
and democracy, then why does the kook right have to constantly raise
and spend such crazy amounts of money to get its message to people who
must surely understand it by now?