![]() |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "dxAce" wrote in message ... m II wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-03-05 06:55 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: Regardless of income. Let the public schools compete for their tuition, just like the private schools. If they're not doing the job, they don't deserve the support, anyway. The possible converse, and rather likely outcome of that will be the taxpayer having to bid on the auction of available tuitions. The death of publicly funded education would be another step closer. I can see the public education system resembling the rust belt at worst and privatized jails at best. I'm now wondering how many of the mob at a book burning have a secondary education. How many Baptists at a snake charming ceremony have a high school diploma? How many of the pervert Mormon's thirty wives have completed grade nine? How many ex-navy guys in Holland MI. finished grade four? I passed! The problem is you dumbass Canucks who never finished grade three :-) Grade three in our universities. I keep forgetting y'all don't have no universities in the hills thar and yur hay tech stuff is all imported Canuckis. But they is jus' watchin' mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNclnuAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt72RkIAJOkkKDhwr 9043xWntZaE5vl jLvHy2ia6+X2xQS9urG3749T1C6g02gT/cc6GlwU/P7b5RwR4G2E1S/hm9cz/Krt 84h9rzdbAZeG0X12zHcI1Fz9N2Fst3eR2zipRoiRO9yLcvDox0 +OdZsdjYFy3G+g KAlb0qDaxgKpbyQMjVe9asd43m4ytTQYreu2GpO03/IjL78uJoYiY7BmQuQrF+su qK9sqH15Lo1xDlIMpRX+92Y6aHuRS5vtgJKc3PJ4GCtKp9V+4U c5yzoqj2qznXE8 IbXkU8RK/qGcGFJ3aLKT18dZ2GXcD4KrDGtPgwpJea5d5BOF2ZVfL2VXj9l SVAk= =PSqe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
D Peter Maus wrote: On 3/4/11 19:28 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/4/2011 2:01 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: There's nothing that says those fortunes can't change, but the truth is, that the people of Wisconsin are behind the Governor. Well, that theory of yours would not explain why the NBC / Wall Street Journal poll showed that 77% of the people think public unions SHOULD be allowed to have collective bargaining. Interesting what you eliminate, when you quote these surveys. 77% of the peeople believe public sector unions should have collective bargaining privileges (it's a privilege, not a right), but that same survey revealed that 60%+ believe that there should not be public sector unions in the first place, and that 3:1 they believe that the budget must be balanced and that public sector union benefits are to blame for a lion's share of the shortfall. So, again, the people are behind the Governor. At least right now. And the Dems In Exile are fast falling from grace with now talks about recall elections to remove the Dems from office. To say nothing of all the talk to recall the Republican governor from office. Interesting also what the skew is on that. But keep swinging, Joe. I think Joe is striking out! |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
PGP Signed Service.Is that Pop Tart?
On Raggggggggland Road, of an Autum Dayyyyyyy,,,,,, I kissed her and I Knewwwwww,,,,,,,, her auburn hairr would weave a snare that I might someday ruuuuuue,,,,,,,,,,, the queen of hearrts was making Tarts,,,,,,,, cuhulin |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
On 3/5/2011 7:58 AM, dxAce wrote:
Damn, you Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists sure are stupid. You are clearly mentally ill. Good old Lare...steady as a rock. You can always, Always, ALWAYS count on him to tap-dance around the issues and resort to his old standby of name calling. C'mon Lare, tell us your thoughts on your new Republican governor TAKING money out of YOUR pocket and GIVING it as a gift to Big Business...and then having the bare faced gall to call it *shared* sacrifice. I know it will be tough for you to refrain from name calling and tap-dancing around the issue (old habits die hard), but maybe you can do it! |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/5/2011 7:58 AM, dxAce wrote: Damn, you Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists sure are stupid. You are clearly mentally ill. Good old Lare...steady as a rock. You can always, Always, ALWAYS count on him to tap-dance around the issues and resort to his old standby of name calling. C'mon Lare, tell us your thoughts on your new Republican governor TAKING money out of YOUR pocket and GIVING it as a gift to Big Business...and then having the bare faced gall to call it *shared* sacrifice. I know it will be tough for you to refrain from name calling and tap-dancing around the issue (old habits die hard), but maybe you can do it! You're confused. But then, being a mentally ill Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist, you know all about confusion. Get back to me when you get the facts straight. |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
On 3/5/2011 8:55 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 3/4/11 19:28 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/4/2011 2:01 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: There's nothing that says those fortunes can't change, but the truth is, that the people of Wisconsin are behind the Governor. Well, that theory of yours would not explain why the NBC / Wall Street Journal poll showed that 77% of the people think public unions SHOULD be allowed to have collective bargaining. Interesting what you eliminate, when you quote these surveys. 77% of the peeople believe public sector unions should have collective bargaining privileges (it's a privilege, not a right), but that same survey revealed that 60%+ believe that there should not be public sector unions in the first place, and that 3:1 they believe that the budget must be balanced and that public sector union benefits are to blame for a lion's share of the shortfall. Yes, blame the middle class, not Big Business or Wall Street. C'mon now...the average salary of all state workers is ~$47,600. That hardly seems like the "lion's share of the shortfall". (and yes, they may have a decent pension, but they are trading off a lower salary now for a better pension in the future). Keep on demonizing those evil public employees or as Christie, the NJ guv calls all those nurses and garbage truck drivers, the "elite". So, again, the people are behind the Governor. Sort of a vague statement. Many may be behind him, but many aren't. At least right now. And the Dems In Exile are fast falling from grace with now talks about recall elections to remove the Dems from office. To say nothing of all the talk to recall the Republican governor from office. Interesting also what the skew is on that. But keep swinging, Joe. Huh? I truly miss your point on "skew" and "keep swinging(?)". The people that are not behind Walker are boiling mad. Thus a Repub recall is certainly a legitimate concern and well within the realm of possibility. So, your point is? Which, actually, may be unnecessary. If they remain out of the state long enough, they'll run afoul of existing laws and will lose their offices, anyway. And that deadline is closing fast. They claim they're working, while away, and are protected from the desertion clauses, but that may be sophistry. If they claim they're working, but are not available (in mass, yet), to vote on pending legislation, then the law says they're not working. And the people are in agreement. But here's the part that's really sticking in the public craw...The Democrats are remaining out of state to avoid facing a vote they will most certainly lose. They may well lose, but they are trying to stick up for the middle class. No, they're not. They're trying to stick up for political contributors. Well, that's a dodge on your part. Not like Walker isn't sticking up for the Koch brothers? As you seem to be on the side of Governor Walker, let me present you with some facts and ask you a question… *Apparently, you see no problem with teachers, nurses, librarians, policemen and firemen losing their rights. No one is losing any rights. Only a privilege that even George Meaney of the AFL-CIO said they had no business getting in the first place. and he said that decades ago. I can't verify that -- and I find it hard to believe a union leader would say workers of any stripe should not have collective bargaining. However, in Wisconsin the workers -have- had that "privilege" for decades...and they may be losing that. And you are splitting hairs and playing a little semantics here, with the "rights" vs "privilege". Bottom line, if this goes through, they will indeed be in a "My way or the highway" situation, a position most of us would not prefer to be in. *What about Walker trying to *ram rod* through in record time this bill that also has a NO-BID clause for the state’s power plants. This should be patently illegal for either party. “No-bid” is just an invitation for corruption. *Even though the “David Koch” was a fake, the point is that Walker –believed- he was real. Legitimate people with legitimate government business cannot get through to the governor on the first call and get 20 minutes of his uninterrupted time like "Koch" did. Really? I did. You did what? Got to talk to the Governor of Wisconsin? For 20 minutes? On the first call? And you're not even a full-time resident of Wisconsin? I'm not disputing you, but that -does- stretch credulity. This would seem to indicate that Walker thinks the Koch brothers are his true bosses. Sophistry. I heard the playback of the call. He sounded like he was massaging a contributor. Too bad he couldn't devote the same effort to actually sit down with the unions and discuss the issue -- rather than reject out of hand the unions offer of economic concessions and spend time kissing the ass of his Koch brothers masters. No different than NPR taking calls from patrons, making promises on programming they have no intention of keeping, and then ignoring that programming once the checks clear. This is really another entirely different debate. I don't know NPR policies as well as you seem to think you do. You are laying some pretty serious charges. Finally, what you say makes no sense -- as it would seem that NPR could could only pull that stunt once, before the word of it spread like wildfire. Again, I'm not disputing you, but you -are- stretching credulity. *In this same bill, Walker is removing the salary income price cap on vouchers for private schools. This would allow children of the wealthy to attend private schools at tax payer's expense. No, it would allow citizens to send their children to private school without having to pay for the public schools at the same time. No one should have to pay the costs of a system that they're currently paying exorbitant rates not to use. Regardless of income. Let the public schools compete for their tuition, just like the private schools. If they're not doing the job, they don't deserve the support, anyway. Hmmm, why was there a salary cap in the first place, if not to keep the rich from abusing the system. And just exactly how do you propose that the middle class and the poor "compete" to get into those private schools? Let me close with a few more examples of Walker's sleaze... 1) If, as you said in your opening statement above that "public sector union benefits are to blame for a lion's share of the shortfall", why would the police and fire unions get a free pass and be exempt? I know, just purely a coincidence that the police/fire unions got a free pass because they originally supported Walker. Coincidence?...yeah, right. Sleaze. 2) Don't forget the Milwaukee scandal. When Walker was a Milwaukee County executive, he fired all the union county security guards and replaced them with private guards from Wackenhut, a BRITISH company (so much for the Repubs being concerned about "jobs, jobs, jobs"). Later, the courts ruled that he illegally fired the original guards, who the county had to hire back, WITH back pay. Walker's union busting folly cost the county $500,000. Hmmm, maybe Walker is a part of the budget shortfall. Sleaze. 3) The Federal government was going to pay for a high speed rail between Milwaukee and Madison. Walker turned it down cold. Please understand that this project was NOT like Alaska's "Bridge to Nowhere"; Milwaukee is Wisconsin's biggest city and Madison is the state capitol and has a very large university. The route would have gotten plenty of traffic and created many, many jobs. But for some kind of hare-brained tea-bagger reason, Walker killed the whole thing. And how ironic -- the Republicans said their main goal was "Jobs, jobs, jobs". Yet more sleaze and more broken promises about jobs. Bottom line: You appear to be a rabid Republican (with tea-bagger leanings) supporter of Walker, apparently no matter what he does, no matter how unethical he is. I believe Walker is a sleaze bag that is selling the people of Wisconsin down the river on many fronts. Neither of us is going to convince either of us otherwise. Please feel free to have the last word. |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/5/2011 8:55 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: On 3/4/11 19:28 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/4/2011 2:01 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: There's nothing that says those fortunes can't change, but the truth is, that the people of Wisconsin are behind the Governor. Well, that theory of yours would not explain why the NBC / Wall Street Journal poll showed that 77% of the people think public unions SHOULD be allowed to have collective bargaining. Interesting what you eliminate, when you quote these surveys. 77% of the peeople believe public sector unions should have collective bargaining privileges (it's a privilege, not a right), but that same survey revealed that 60%+ believe that there should not be public sector unions in the first place, and that 3:1 they believe that the budget must be balanced and that public sector union benefits are to blame for a lion's share of the shortfall. Yes, blame the middle class, not Big Business or Wall Street. C'mon now...the average salary of all state workers is ~$47,600. That hardly seems like the "lion's share of the shortfall". (and yes, they may have a decent pension, but they are trading off a lower salary now for a better pension in the future). Keep on demonizing those evil public employees or as Christie, the NJ guv calls all those nurses and garbage truck drivers, the "elite". So, again, the people are behind the Governor. Sort of a vague statement. Many may be behind him, but many aren't. At least right now. And the Dems In Exile are fast falling from grace with now talks about recall elections to remove the Dems from office. To say nothing of all the talk to recall the Republican governor from office. Interesting also what the skew is on that. But keep swinging, Joe. Huh? I truly miss your point on "skew" and "keep swinging(?)". The people that are not behind Walker are boiling mad. Thus a Repub recall is certainly a legitimate concern and well within the realm of possibility. So, your point is? Which, actually, may be unnecessary. If they remain out of the state long enough, they'll run afoul of existing laws and will lose their offices, anyway. And that deadline is closing fast. They claim they're working, while away, and are protected from the desertion clauses, but that may be sophistry. If they claim they're working, but are not available (in mass, yet), to vote on pending legislation, then the law says they're not working. And the people are in agreement. But here's the part that's really sticking in the public craw...The Democrats are remaining out of state to avoid facing a vote they will most certainly lose. They may well lose, but they are trying to stick up for the middle class. No, they're not. They're trying to stick up for political contributors. Well, that's a dodge on your part. Not like Walker isn't sticking up for the Koch brothers? As you seem to be on the side of Governor Walker, let me present you with some facts and ask you a question… *Apparently, you see no problem with teachers, nurses, librarians, policemen and firemen losing their rights. No one is losing any rights. Only a privilege that even George Meaney of the AFL-CIO said they had no business getting in the first place. and he said that decades ago. I can't verify that -- and I find it hard to believe a union leader would say workers of any stripe should not have collective bargaining. However, in Wisconsin the workers -have- had that "privilege" for decades...and they may be losing that. And you are splitting hairs and playing a little semantics here, with the "rights" vs "privilege". Bottom line, if this goes through, they will indeed be in a "My way or the highway" situation, a position most of us would not prefer to be in. *What about Walker trying to *ram rod* through in record time this bill that also has a NO-BID clause for the state’s power plants. This should be patently illegal for either party. “No-bid” is just an invitation for corruption. *Even though the “David Koch” was a fake, the point is that Walker –believed- he was real. Legitimate people with legitimate government business cannot get through to the governor on the first call and get 20 minutes of his uninterrupted time like "Koch" did. Really? I did. You did what? Got to talk to the Governor of Wisconsin? For 20 minutes? On the first call? And you're not even a full-time resident of Wisconsin? I'm not disputing you, but that -does- stretch credulity. This would seem to indicate that Walker thinks the Koch brothers are his true bosses. Sophistry. I heard the playback of the call. He sounded like he was massaging a contributor. Too bad he couldn't devote the same effort to actually sit down with the unions and discuss the issue -- rather than reject out of hand the unions offer of economic concessions and spend time kissing the ass of his Koch brothers masters. No different than NPR taking calls from patrons, making promises on programming they have no intention of keeping, and then ignoring that programming once the checks clear. This is really another entirely different debate. I don't know NPR policies as well as you seem to think you do. You are laying some pretty serious charges. Finally, what you say makes no sense -- as it would seem that NPR could could only pull that stunt once, before the word of it spread like wildfire. Again, I'm not disputing you, but you -are- stretching credulity. You clown 'tard Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists stretch credulity on a daily basis. |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/5/2011 7:58 AM, dxAce wrote: Damn, you Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists sure are stupid. You are clearly mentally ill. Good old Lare...steady as a rock. You can always, Always, ALWAYS count on him to tap-dance around the issues and resort to his old standby of name calling. C'mon Lare, tell us your thoughts on your new Republican governor TAKING money out of YOUR pocket and GIVING it as a gift to Big Business...and then having the bare faced gall to call it *shared* sacrifice. I know it will be tough for you to refrain from name calling and tap-dancing around the issue (old habits die hard), but maybe you can do it! On 3/5/2011 2:47 PM, dxAce wrote: You're confused. But then, being a mentally ill Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist, you know all about confusion. Get back to me when you get the facts straight. Yet ANOTHER dodge and tap dance. Keep it up and people will start to think you don't have the brains or the balls to give a straightforward answer. Oh, sorry...most of them think that already. |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
Joe from Kokomo wrote: Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 3/5/2011 7:58 AM, dxAce wrote: Damn, you Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists sure are stupid. You are clearly mentally ill. Good old Lare...steady as a rock. You can always, Always, ALWAYS count on him to tap-dance around the issues and resort to his old standby of name calling. C'mon Lare, tell us your thoughts on your new Republican governor TAKING money out of YOUR pocket and GIVING it as a gift to Big Business...and then having the bare faced gall to call it *shared* sacrifice. I know it will be tough for you to refrain from name calling and tap-dancing around the issue (old habits die hard), but maybe you can do it! On 3/5/2011 2:47 PM, dxAce wrote: You're confused. But then, being a mentally ill Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist, you know all about confusion. Get back to me when you get the facts straight. Yet ANOTHER dodge and tap dance. Keep it up and people will start to think you don't have the brains or the balls to give a straightforward answer. Oh, sorry...most of them think that already. Ah, another post from a clown 'tard who can't get his facts straight. |
It's 'The Curse' of "The SUV" !
We got To the Shores of Tripoli starting right now, TCM channel.
We will probally be going to those Shores again pretty soon. cuhulin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com