Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 24, 7:48*pm, hal lillywhite wrote:
On Apr 24, 1:22*pm, Bill Shatzer wrote: If a camera can really look through walls then police use constitutes a search which must meet the same requirements as if they cop goes into the house. The English common law said THAT? Nor does it say that cops can't have someone sneak a bug into someone's home without a warrant. *It simply says (if I understand correctly) that you need a warrant to search private homes etc. *That is any search, be it by physical entry or infrared. *The question is if it is a search and if so is there probably cause. In addition the forth amendment clarified the need to get a warrant based on probable cause. We can add "probable cause" to the list of constitutional imponderables. I would like to see a number put on that. *At least 75% probable that there is evidence etc. there before the warrant is issued. *Of course that would require teaching some probability to cops and judges. Just how would you presume to place a number on THAT. What constitutes "75%" or whatever probability? However would you compute that? That's the sort of thing I can have lots of fun with. *You do things like determining witness reliability, or the probability that the tire tracks at the scene. *Most likely you will have to calculate joint probabilities.* *Not that difficult to do if you have a bit of statistical knowledge. *For example, tracks show about a size 10 shoe. *There are probably Y people in the area with that shoe size. *The right shoe has unusual wear on the outer side of the toe. *The thief stepped in mud and probably weighed about 200 pounds. *Thief was able to reach the entry window without putting any box or ladder in the soft dirt underneath which means he must be six feet or more tall. *Calculate the joint probability of all those. *Then combine that with things like witness reports, what a pawn shop owner might remember or have records of from the stuff being pawned and you can get some pretty good numbers. This Weeks Theme {Message} Is . . . "The Cult of the Obama" Just Say Hell "NO" To Candidate Obama in 2012 ! 50 Legal Ways To STOP an Obama Second Term in 2012 and End 'The Cult of Obama' http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dd53e471fbb674 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nine Democrats switch to the Republican Party | Shortwave | |||
REPUBLICAN FAMILY VALUES | Shortwave | |||
The Republican revolution | Policy | |||
What the Republican Convention will look like. | Shortwave | |||
Another act of Republican "these laws are for everyone but us": | Shortwave |