Attention Birthers!
 

On Apr 24, 3:32*pm, clairbear wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote in news:iovbb9
:





On 4/22/2011 10:23 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 4/22/2011 5:59 PM, clairbear wrote:

Or clinton I did not have sex with that woman.

Clinton never said that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

Actual quote
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman.."
* ...

Gee, that changes everything, doesn't it.

Yes, it does. *In fact, it was a true statement if one defines "sexual
relations" as "sexual intercourse."

OK, let's hang the ******* for that lie, instead of the misquoted
one!

It wasn't a lie. *Neither Clinton nor Lewinsky believed that they had
engaged in "sexual relations."

Are you really THAT DUMB? Or are you just trolling for the old
gainsaying arguement aboutwhether Willy lied about what or who he did
with his willy?

Heres a bit of info on generally accepted definitions of Sexual
realtions

Wikipedia on Answers.com: Human sexual activity

Hey KOOK, I gots a NEWS FLASH fer ya:

WIKIPEDIA ain't the lawyer. It doesn't matter what YOU think the
generally accepted definitions are... the ONLY thing that matters is
what was on the LIST of sexual activities that was used in the
deposition. Guess what? Jones' lawyers ****ED UP and didn't have blow
job on their.

Clinton answered truthfully based on the definitions he was given.

End of story.

Attention Birthers!
 

On 4/27/2011 7:27 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

...
WIKIPEDIA ain't the lawyer. It doesn't matter what YOU think the
generally accepted definitions are... the ONLY thing that matters is
what was on the LIST of sexual activities that was used in the
deposition. Guess what? Jones' lawyers ****ED UP and didn't have blow
job on their.

Clinton answered truthfully based on the definitions he was given.

End of story.

ROFLOL!!!

If irantard tells you the sun is up, and it is noon on a sunny day, look
outside first!

ROFLOL!!!


Regards,
JS

Attention Birthers!
 

On Apr 27, 8:52*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2011 7:27 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

...
WIKIPEDIA ain't the lawyer. It doesn't matter what YOU think the
generally accepted definitions are... the ONLY thing that matters is
what was on the LIST of sexual activities that was used in the
deposition. Guess what? Jones' lawyers ****ED UP and didn't have blow
job on their.

Clinton answered truthfully based on the definitions he was given.

End of story.

ROFLOL!!!

If irantard tells you the sun is up, and it is noon on a sunny day, look
outside first!

Well now, it looks like Johnny KQQK has made it his life's goal to be
stupid about EVERYTHING!

Hey Johnny, SUCK ON THIS!!

BWAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...-long-form.pdf

Sure does suck to be Johnny KQQK and all other birfloons!!!

Doesn't get a single word..!!
So I request you to explain it in simple words...!!!

Attention Birthers!
 

Iarnrod wrote in news:8bd755c9-808c-4e8a-9edc-
:

On Apr 24, 3:32*pm, clairbear wrote:
Lamont Cranston wrote in
news:iovbb9
:





On 4/22/2011 10:23 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 4/22/2011 5:59 PM, clairbear wrote:

Or clinton I did not have sex with that woman.

Clinton never said that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

Actual quote
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman.."
* ...

Gee, that changes everything, doesn't it.

Yes, it does. *In fact, it was a true statement if one defines
"sexua
l
relations" as "sexual intercourse."

OK, let's hang the ******* for that lie, instead of the misquoted
one!

It wasn't a lie. *Neither Clinton nor Lewinsky believed that they
had
engaged in "sexual relations."

Are you really THAT DUMB? Or are you just trolling for the old
gainsaying arguement aboutwhether Willy lied about what or who he did
with his willy?

Heres a bit of info on generally accepted definitions of Sexual
realtions

Wikipedia on Answers.com: Human sexual activity

Hey KOOK, I gots a NEWS FLASH fer ya:

WIKIPEDIA ain't the lawyer. It doesn't matter what YOU think the
generally accepted definitions are... the ONLY thing that matters is
what was on the LIST of sexual activities that was used in the
deposition. Guess what? Jones' lawyers ****ED UP and didn't have blow
job on their.

Clinton answered truthfully based on the definitions he was given.

End of story.

The thread is about the veracity of Clinton's remark vis-a-vis monica
lewinsky and the sexual activity between them, in this case a blow job,
not about a law suit involving alleged sexual harassment. Funny how you
would tar and feather someone like Clarence Thomas who allegedly made a
remark about pubic hair and give a man who cheated on his wife in the
Oval Office a pass. And before you go off on another hypocritical jag
there are those on both the right and left who have sinned as it were
and tried to hide it from the voters and the rest of the public. After
all the a just flawed human beings not paragons of vitue.
BTW I find it funny how how you and other get foul mouthed and abusive
when one of your heros is shown to have feet of clay.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---