|
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
In article b3704448-a106-4760-98f6-
, says... On May 4, 3:22*pm, BDK wrote: In article 7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46*am, BDK wrote: In article 093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs on the United States Citizens that live and work on Great Britains United States of America, the bankruptcy cinched it.You wont find this taught in schools or no one would pay income tax ever again. Read these articles. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/Gre...n_owns_USA.PDF Here's you a great lesson in history by Myron Fagan up untill the last few minutes when starts pushing Mormanism(the jesuit practice of incest and pedphilia). http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/MyronFagan.htm No matter how many times you post it Joe, it's still 100% kooktardery. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 5, 12:49*am, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, *wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, *wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
|
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 5, 7:01*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/5/2011 3:53 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 5, 6:24 pm, George *wrote: On 5/5/2011 12:17 PM, joeturn wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frf9G...eature=related Bull**** Heres your Bull****. *Your stupid little video is bull****. You believe and eat bull****. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w53TMpk6QNc |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/5/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:
On May 5, 7:01 pm, George wrote: On 5/5/2011 3:53 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 5, 6:24 pm, George wrote: On 5/5/2011 12:17 PM, joeturn wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frf9G...eature=related Bull**** Heres your Bull****. Your stupid little video is bull****. You believe and eat bull****. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w53TMpk6QNc More bull**** - all you have. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 3, 11:51 pm, George wrote: On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was fatherless, And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not. If she was no legally married, then the location DOES NOT MATTER!!! That's completely wrong. The McCarran Walter Act, aka the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952, specified in Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a): The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years The marital status of the parents is irrelevant. That is incorrect. No - it is correct. The above applied only to married parents. That's false, of course, but moot: Stanley Ann Dunham was indubitably married to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. Once again, you lose and have **** on your face. Just for fun, and to rub your nose in the **** even mo CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK: Sec. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5) and (7) of section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one years by legitimation. http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmi...stat%20163.pdf So, of course, we see that the relevant law cited above, covering birth abroad to parents of whom only one is a U.S. citizen, would have applied to Hussein's birth had he been born abroad, whether or not his parents were married, and so he would not have been born a U.S. citizen had he been born abroad because his citizen-parent - his mother - did not meet the residency requirement. Your bull**** is refuted, and you have still more **** on your face. This happens frequently to snarky, absurdly arrogant young males like you. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 6, 4:37*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 1:19 am, George *wrote: On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 3, 11:51 pm, George * *wrote: On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was fatherless, And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 6, 4:39*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George *wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, * *wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George * *wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, * * *wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, * * *wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb.... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!! Blimpton seems increasingly intent on maintaining his perfect record of never having been correct about anything! |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 11:53 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:37 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 1:19 am, George wrote: On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 3, 11:51 pm, George wrote: On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was fatherless, And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not. If she was no legally married, then the location DOES NOT MATTER!!! That's completely wrong. The McCarran Walter Act, aka the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952, specified in Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a): The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years The marital status of the parents is irrelevant. Correct: it is irrelevant. IF he had been born abroad, Hussein would not have been born a citizen, under the law in effect in 1961. So bigamy has become legal? You have no proof, of course, that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was married to someone else while married to Stanley Ann Dunham. And you still have none. I win You lose. You lose. Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen under the law in effect in 1961. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. You're a boy - not in doubt. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:
Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen under the law in effect in 1961. Yes he would have. The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker. You lose. I win. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 7, 3:55*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George *wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George * *wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, * * *wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George * * *wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, * * * *wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, * * * *wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. *You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. * I LOVE the smell of irony from the rightards!! You're a boy - not in doubt. BWAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!! Blimpie... determined to be a ****-up to the very end!! |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53 pm, George wrote: Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen under the law in effect in 1961. Yes he would have. No. His mother was the only citizen parent. Whether she was married or not, she didn't meet the residency requirement. If you think you can cite something showing that an unmarried 18-year-old American citizen giving birth abroad in 1961 would have begat an American citizen, then cite it. Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote: On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. I LOVE the smell of irony You're a snarky boy. You're male, and due to your immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a), paragraph 7 of the Immigration and
Naturalization Act of 1952, aka the McCarran-Walter Act, specifies which children born abroad to parents of whom only one is an American citizen is himself an American citizen: The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years The snarky boy, "iaranrod", pretends that this only applies to to children born to married couples, only one of whom is an American citizen. The snarky boy then assumes that if the couple were not legally married, then a child born to them would be a citizen. That's *WRONG*. Section 309 actually places *greater* restrictions, not fewer, on establishing the American citizenship of the child if the parents were not married: CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK: Sec. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5) and (7) of section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one years by legitimation. http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmi...stat%20163.pdf So, regardless of whether or not Hussein's parents were married, he would not have been born a citizen had he been born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions: regardless of his mother's marital status, she didn't meet the necessary requirements for giving birth abroad to an American citizen under the law effective in 1961: QED. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
In 1961, a child born abroad to one alien parent and one American
citizen parent aged 18 or under would not be an American citizen. This is not in rational dispute. If Hussein Obama, the putative president of the US, were born abroad, he would not be a citizen and therefore would be ineligible for election to the presidency. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
On May 7, 9:31*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote: Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen under the law in effect in 1961. - Yes he would have. - The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker. - You lose. - I win. Larnrod, Actually most US States {The USA] Do 'Recongnize' "Bigamy" as a Crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigamy Larnrod, What most US States {The USA] Does Not 'Recongnize' "Polygamy" : Being In Multiple Marriage at the same time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygam..._United_States Larnrod : So much for you many un-ending assertions of : "You lose. & I win." it is simply logical... ~ RHF -and-you-are-simply-'larnrod'- |
"BO" The Anchor Baby ! -wrt- Obama The Child of an Illegitimate Father
On May 7, 9:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote: - - - Had Hussein been born abroad, he would - - - not have been born a citizen under the law - - - in effect in 1961. - - Yes he would have. - No. *His mother was the only citizen parent. - Whether she was married or not, she didn't - meet the residency requirement. - - If you think you can cite something showing - that an unmarried 18-year-old American citizen - giving birth abroad in 1961 would have begat an - American citizen, then cite it. -*Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up. -read- An Illegitimate Child, an Illegitimate President -by- Pamela Geller -source- World Net Daily http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=294981 ....was... BHO #1 an INS Person of Interest . . . in 1961 -more-questions-many-more-questions-lots-of-questions- http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d77549ce53d23b |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On May 7, 10:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote: Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen under the law in effect in 1961. Yes he would have. No. *His mother was the only citizen parent. *Whether she was married or not, she didn't meet the residency requirement. Immaterial. You need to bone up on what we like to call "facts," Blimpie! tee hee |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
The snarky boy, who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong. In particular, he is wrong about whether or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad. Given the citizenship of Hussein Jr.'s father and the age of his mother, Hussein would not have been born a citizen had he been born abroad in 1961. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) specifies who is born a citizen (including birth in the United States.) If birth is abroad to parents of whom only one is a citizen, there is a US residency requirement for the citizen parent. Hussein Jr.'s mother did not meet that requirement in 1961, *irrespective* of her marital status. If Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was not legally married to Hussein Sr., as the snarky boy fatuously maintains without a shred of proof, that has no bearing on whether or not she met the residency requirement. If she was not legally married to Hussein Sr. but had met the residency requirement, then that would make it *harder*, not easier, for Hussein Jr. to have been born a citizen. But the inability of the Maoist mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, to meet the residency requirement, is all you need to know: had Hussein Jr. been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
On May 8, 10:22*am, George Plimpton wrote:
The snarky boy, Is that you, Blimpton? BWAHAAHAAHAAAA!!! You've probably never even SEEN a woman, Blimpie. 'cept your mom. who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Not before. Not now. You are wrong. *In particular, he is wrong about whether or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad.. Incorrect. you are. FACT. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
On May 8, 10:15*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George *wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right, it is always the case that I have never been wrong. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? *You're not. *You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. *I know. *We all know. *What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor Blimpie. Never seen a woman's vagina since his mommy squirted his sorry ass out on the floor and left him. No wonder he's so "gender confused!" chuckle |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and BlimptonAgrees...
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right That's right: always wrong. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped] You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
In sci.skeptic George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Mother fixation. -- [Why Are Republicans Climate Skeptics?] Maybe that's because the Republicans come from more rural states that haven't had any warming, man-made or otherwise. -- BONZO@27-32-240-172 [86 nyms and counting], 28 Oct 2010 15:25 +1100 |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
|
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right That's right: always wrong. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped] You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right That's right: always wrong. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped] You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right That's right: always wrong. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped] You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
DRUNK! Shotgun Cheney Diagnosed with END STAGE HEART FAILURE
http://www.rense.com DRUNK! Shotgun Cheney nearly gave Mr.Whittington heart failure on that bird hunt in Texas in February 2006. What goes around comes around, DRUNK ASS! Shotgun Cheney! HURRY UP!!! cuhulin |
Iarnrod (Larnrod - haw haw haw!) admits: Hussein would not havebeen a citizen if born abroad
The INA of 1952 describes who is a citizen if born abroad (it has been
amended since its original enactment.) The law in effect in 1961 is clear: a child born abroad to parents of whom only one was a US citizen would not be a citizen at birth unless the citizen-parent had lived five years in the USA after the age of 14, *regardless* of the citizen-parent's marital status. As the Maoist Stanley Ann Dunham, Hussein's America-hating mother and his one citizen-parent, was only 18 at the time of Hussein's birth, Hussein could not possibly have been born a US citizen had he been born abroad - which he well might have been. The INA of 1952 describes who *is* a citizen at birth. If not in one of the listed categories, a person is not a citizen at birth - end of story. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong All the Time, in his Usual ShabbyShitbag Snarky Young Male Way
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:41 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod proved: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. That's right, it is always the case that I have been wrong. That's right: I know. We all do. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Poor poor Blimpie. Never seen a woman's vagina since his mommy squirted his sorry ass out on the floor and left him. No wonder he's so "gender confused!"chuckle You're not a woman. This will You're not a woman. You're a snarky young male in Colorado who likes to pose in Usenet as a 60+ year old woman. You're a punk male - proved. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and BlimptonAgrees...
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:45 pm, George wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: In sci.skeptic George wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Mother fixation. It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's treatable or not. Well, Well, why don't you **** off, boy? |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote: On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. I LOVE the smell of irony You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
On May 30, 11:17*am, George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM,Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:45 pm, George Blimpton wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: In sci.skeptic George Blimpton wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George Blimpton wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Mother fixation. It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's treatable or not. Well, Well, why don't you **** off, boy? I am having too much fun ****ting down your throat, rightard. Why would you want to deprive me of my daily fun kicking around you rightards? Do you hate America? |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote: On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. I LOVE the smell of irony You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy. |
As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
On May 30, 3:03*pm, George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM,Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:45 pm, George Blimpton wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: In sci.skeptic George Blimpton wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod wrote: On May 8, 10:22 am, George Blimpton wrote: The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old woman, gets everything wrong. I of course have never been wrong. Always. Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're (nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's with the ****ing lame charade, boy? Mother fixation. It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's treatable or not. Well, Well, why don't you **** off, boy? I am having too much fun ****ting down your throat, rightard. Why would you want to deprive me of my daily fun kicking around you rightards? Do you hate America? |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote: On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. I LOVE the smell of irony You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy. |
RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote: On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote: On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote: On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote: On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote: In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@ 34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says... On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote: In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc- , says... If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus Social Security Numbers . Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned temporary numbers only good for six months! WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers? This should be a good one.. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income tax this is British tarriffs You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up. I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency! OK. http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb... That doesn't "prove" anything, boy. It proves everything, It doesn't "prove" anything, boy. "Boy!" Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. I LOVE the smell of irony You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com