RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate! (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/164987-re-rank-forgery-obama-birth-certificate.html)

BDK[_7_] May 5th 11 05:25 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
In article 8351d405-b405-44f1-b46e-2a2c100dcb47
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 4, 3:22*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...







On May 3, 1:46*am, BDK wrote:
In article 093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?

This should be a good one..

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs on the United States Citizens that live
and work on Great Britains United States! Americas bankruptcy cinched
it.You wont find this
taught in schools or no one would pay income tax ever again. Read
these articles.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html


And again, this proves you are totally insane.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

BDK[_7_] May 5th 11 05:26 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
In article b3704448-a106-4760-98f6-
,
says...

On May 4, 3:22*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...







On May 3, 1:46*am, BDK wrote:
In article 093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?

This should be a good one..

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs on the United States Citizens that live
and work on Great Britains United States of America, the bankruptcy
cinched it.You wont find this taught in schools or no one would pay
income tax ever again. Read these articles.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html


http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/Gre...n_owns_USA.PDF


Here's you a great lesson in history by Myron Fagan up untill the
last few minutes when starts pushing Mormanism(the jesuit practice of
incest and pedphilia).


http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/MyronFagan.htm


No matter how many times you post it Joe, it's still 100% kooktardery.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

joeturn May 5th 11 06:56 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 5, 12:49*am, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:





On May 4, 3:22 pm, *wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, *wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!

joeturn May 5th 11 08:17 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frf9G...eature=related

joeturn May 6th 11 03:46 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 5, 7:01*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/5/2011 3:53 PM, joeturn wrote:

On May 5, 6:24 pm, George *wrote:
On 5/5/2011 12:17 PM, joeturn wrote:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frf9G...eature=related


Bull****


Heres your


Bull****. *Your stupid little video is bull****.

You believe and eat bull****.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w53TMpk6QNc

George Plimpton May 6th 11 03:53 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/5/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:
On May 5, 7:01 pm, George wrote:
On 5/5/2011 3:53 PM, joeturn wrote:

On May 5, 6:24 pm, George wrote:
On 5/5/2011 12:17 PM, joeturn wrote:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frf9G...eature=related


Bull****


Heres your


Bull****. Your stupid little video is bull****.

You believe and eat bull****.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w53TMpk6QNc


More bull**** - all you have.


George Plimpton May 6th 11 08:19 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 3, 11:51 pm, George wrote:
On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:



"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...


None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was
fatherless,


And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen
EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not.
If she was no legally married, then the location DOES NOT MATTER!!!


That's completely wrong. The McCarran Walter Act, aka the Immigration
and Naturalization Act of 1952, specified in Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a):

The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth:

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States
and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien,
and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth
of such person, was physically present in the United States or its
outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
of fourteen years

The marital status of the parents is irrelevant.


That is incorrect.


No - it is correct.

The above applied only to married parents.


That's false, of course, but moot: Stanley Ann Dunham was indubitably
married to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. Once again, you lose and have ****
on your face.

Just for fun, and to rub your nose in the **** even mo

CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK:

Sec. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5) and (7) of
section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title
shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock
on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such
child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one
years by legitimation.

http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmi...stat%20163.pdf

So, of course, we see that the relevant law cited above, covering birth
abroad to parents of whom only one is a U.S. citizen, would have applied
to Hussein's birth had he been born abroad, whether or not his parents
were married, and so he would not have been born a U.S. citizen had he
been born abroad because his citizen-parent - his mother - did not meet
the residency requirement. Your bull**** is refuted, and you have still
more **** on your face. This happens frequently to snarky, absurdly
arrogant young males like you.

Iarnrod May 7th 11 07:53 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 6, 4:37*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 1:19 am, George *wrote:
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 3, 11:51 pm, George * *wrote:
On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:


"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...


None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was
fatherless,


And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen
EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not.


Iarnrod May 7th 11 07:54 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 6, 4:39*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 9:32 am, George *wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, * *wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George * *wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, * * *wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, * * *wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb....


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!" BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!

Blimpton seems increasingly intent on maintaining his perfect record
of never having been correct about anything!

George Plimpton May 7th 11 10:53 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 11:53 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:37 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 1:19 am, George wrote:
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 3, 11:51 pm, George wrote:
On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:


"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...


None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was
fatherless,


And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen
EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not.
If she was no legally married, then the location DOES NOT MATTER!!!


That's completely wrong. The McCarran Walter Act, aka the Immigration
and Naturalization Act of 1952, specified in Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a):


The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth:


(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States
and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien,
and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth
of such person, was physically present in the United States or its
outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
of fourteen years


The marital status of the parents is irrelevant.


Correct: it is irrelevant.

IF he had been born abroad, Hussein would not have been born a citizen,
under the law in effect in 1961.


So bigamy has become legal?


You have no proof, of course, that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was married
to someone else while married to Stanley Ann Dunham.


And you still have none.



I win


You lose.


You lose.

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

George Plimpton May 7th 11 10:55 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. You're a boy -
not in doubt.

Iarnrod May 8th 11 05:31 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.


Yes he would have. The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker. You lose.
I win.

Iarnrod May 8th 11 05:33 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 7, 3:55*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George *wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George * *wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, * * *wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George * * *wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, * * * *wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, * * * *wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


*You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. *


I LOVE the smell of irony from the rightards!!

You're a boy -
not in doubt.


BWAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!! Blimpie... determined to be a ****-up to the very
end!!


George Plimpton May 8th 11 05:41 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53 pm, George wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.


Yes he would have.


No. His mother was the only citizen parent. Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.

If you think you can cite something showing that an unmarried
18-year-old American citizen giving birth abroad in 1961 would have
begat an American citizen, then cite it. Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

George Plimpton May 8th 11 05:46 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.


I LOVE the smell of irony


You're a snarky boy. You're male, and due to your immaturity, you're a
boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor,
you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.

George Plimpton May 8th 11 06:28 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a), paragraph 7 of the Immigration and
Naturalization Act of 1952, aka the McCarran-Walter Act, specifies which
children born abroad to parents of whom only one is an American citizen
is himself an American citizen:

The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State
at birth:

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the
United States
and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an
alien,
and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to
the birth
of such person, was physically present in the United States
or its
outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not
less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
of fourteen years


The snarky boy, "iaranrod", pretends that this only applies to to
children born to married couples, only one of whom is an American
citizen. The snarky boy then assumes that if the couple were not
legally married, then a child born to them would be a citizen. That's
*WRONG*. Section 309 actually places *greater* restrictions, not fewer,
on establishing the American citizenship of the child if the parents
were not married:

CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK:

Sec. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5) and (7) of
section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title
shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock
on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such
child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one
years by legitimation.

http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmi...stat%20163.pdf

So, regardless of whether or not Hussein's parents were married, he
would not have been born a citizen had he been born outside the
geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions:
regardless of his mother's marital status, she didn't meet the necessary
requirements for giving birth abroad to an American citizen under the
law effective in 1961: QED.


George Plimpton May 8th 11 06:33 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
In 1961, a child born abroad to one alien parent and one American
citizen parent aged 18 or under would not be an American citizen. This
is not in rational dispute.

If Hussein Obama, the putative president of the US, were born abroad, he
would not be a citizen and therefore would be ineligible for election to
the presidency.

RHF May 8th 11 08:53 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
On May 7, 9:31*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.


- Yes he would have.
- The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker.
- You lose.
- I win.

Larnrod,
Actually most US States {The USA] Do 'Recongnize'
"Bigamy" as a Crime.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigamy

Larnrod,
What most US States {The USA] Does Not 'Recongnize'
"Polygamy" : Being In Multiple Marriage at the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygam..._United_States

Larnrod : So much for you many un-ending assertions
of : "You lose. & I win."

it is simply logical... ~ RHF
-and-you-are-simply-'larnrod'-

RHF May 8th 11 09:31 AM

"BO" The Anchor Baby ! -wrt- Obama The Child of an Illegitimate Father
 
On May 7, 9:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:


- - - Had Hussein been born abroad, he would
- - - not have been born a citizen under the law
- - - in effect in 1961.

- - Yes he would have.

- No. *His mother was the only citizen parent.
- Whether she was married or not, she didn't
- meet the residency requirement.
-
- If you think you can cite something showing
- that an unmarried 18-year-old American citizen
- giving birth abroad in 1961 would have begat an
- American citizen, then cite it.
-*Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

-read- An Illegitimate Child, an Illegitimate President
-by- Pamela Geller -source- World Net Daily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=294981
....was... BHO #1 an INS Person of Interest . . . in 1961
-more-questions-many-more-questions-lots-of-questions-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d77549ce53d23b

Iarnrod May 8th 11 04:04 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On May 7, 10:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:


Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.


Yes he would have.


No. *His mother was the only citizen parent. *Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.


Immaterial. You need to bone up on what we like to call "facts,"
Blimpie!

tee hee



George Plimpton May 8th 11 05:22 PM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
The snarky boy, who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong. In particular, he is wrong about whether
or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad.

Given the citizenship of Hussein Jr.'s father and the age of his mother,
Hussein would not have been born a citizen had he been born abroad in
1961. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) specifies
who is born a citizen (including birth in the United States.) If birth
is abroad to parents of whom only one is a citizen, there is a US
residency requirement for the citizen parent. Hussein Jr.'s mother did
not meet that requirement in 1961, *irrespective* of her marital status.
If Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was not legally married to Hussein Sr., as
the snarky boy fatuously maintains without a shred of proof, that has no
bearing on whether or not she met the residency requirement. If she was
not legally married to Hussein Sr. but had met the residency
requirement, then that would make it *harder*, not easier, for Hussein
Jr. to have been born a citizen.

But the inability of the Maoist mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, to meet the
residency requirement, is all you need to know: had Hussein Jr. been
born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen.

Iarnrod May 9th 11 04:39 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
On May 8, 10:22*am, George Plimpton wrote:
The snarky boy,


Is that you, Blimpton?

BWAHAAHAAHAAAA!!! You've probably never even SEEN a woman, Blimpie.
'cept your mom.

who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong. Not before. Not now. You are
wrong.

*In particular, he is wrong about whether
or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad..


Incorrect. you are.

FACT.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:15 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.

Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?

Iarnrod May 9th 11 05:26 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
 
On May 8, 10:15*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 10:22 am, George *wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right, it is always the case that I have never been wrong.

Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? *You're not. *You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. *I know. *We all know. *What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor Blimpie. Never seen a woman's vagina since his mommy
squirted his sorry ass out on the floor and left him. No wonder he's
so "gender confused!" chuckle


George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:41 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and BlimptonAgrees...
 
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right


That's right: always wrong.


Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped]


You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes
you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet.

[email protected] May 9th 11 05:42 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
In sci.skeptic George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.

I of course have never been wrong.

Always.
Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Mother fixation.

--
[Why Are Republicans Climate Skeptics?]
Maybe that's because the Republicans come from more rural states that haven't
had any warming, man-made or otherwise.
-- BONZO@27-32-240-172 [86 nyms and counting], 28 Oct 2010 15:25 +1100

George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:45 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote:
In sci.skeptic George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.
I of course have never been wrong.

Always.
Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Mother fixation.


It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's
treatable or not. What I know - what everyone knows - is that it's a
charade, a pose. He's a young snarky male, without any doubt.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:46 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
 
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right


That's right: always wrong.


Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped]


You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes
you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:47 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
 
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right


That's right: always wrong.


Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped]


You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes
you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 05:47 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again, As Always
 
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right


That's right: always wrong.


Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor [snarky boy bull**** snipped]


You're not a woman. You have some bizarre mental handicap that causes
you to want to pretend to be one in Usenet.

[email protected] May 9th 11 06:05 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 
DRUNK! Shotgun Cheney Diagnosed with END STAGE HEART FAILURE
http://www.rense.com

DRUNK! Shotgun Cheney nearly gave Mr.Whittington heart failure on that
bird hunt in Texas in February 2006.

What goes around comes around, DRUNK ASS! Shotgun Cheney! HURRY UP!!!
cuhulin


George Plimpton May 9th 11 06:52 AM

Iarnrod (Larnrod - haw haw haw!) admits: Hussein would not havebeen a citizen if born abroad
 
The INA of 1952 describes who is a citizen if born abroad (it has been
amended since its original enactment.) The law in effect in 1961 is
clear: a child born abroad to parents of whom only one was a US citizen
would not be a citizen at birth unless the citizen-parent had lived five
years in the USA after the age of 14, *regardless* of the
citizen-parent's marital status. As the Maoist Stanley Ann Dunham,
Hussein's America-hating mother and his one citizen-parent, was only 18
at the time of Hussein's birth, Hussein could not possibly have been
born a US citizen had he been born abroad - which he well might have been.

The INA of 1952 describes who *is* a citizen at birth. If not in one of
the listed categories, a person is not a citizen at birth - end of story.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 03:09 PM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong All the Time, in his Usual ShabbyShitbag Snarky Young Male Way
 
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:41 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 9:26 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 8, 10:15 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod proved:


On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.


I of course have never been wrong.


Always.


That's right, it is always the case that I have been wrong.


That's right:


I know.


We all do.

Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Poor poor Blimpie. Never seen a woman's vagina since his mommy
squirted his sorry ass out on the floor and left him. No wonder he's
so "gender confused!"chuckle


You're not a woman.


This will


You're not a woman. You're a snarky young male in Colorado who likes to
pose in Usenet as a 60+ year old woman. You're a punk male - proved.

George Plimpton May 9th 11 03:09 PM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and BlimptonAgrees...
 
On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:45 pm, George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote:

In sci.skeptic George wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrodwrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.
I of course have never been wrong.
Always.
Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Mother fixation.


It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's
treatable or not.


Well,


Well, why don't you **** off, boy?

George Plimpton May 30th 11 06:17 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.


I LOVE the smell of irony


You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your
immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears
juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.

Iarnrod May 30th 11 09:00 PM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
 
On May 30, 11:17*am, George Blimpton wrote:

On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM,Iarnrod wrote:


On May 8, 10:45 pm, George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote:


In sci.skeptic George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George Blimpton wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.
I of course have never been wrong.
Always.
Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?


Mother fixation.


It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's
treatable or not.


Well,


Well, why don't you **** off, boy?


I am having too much fun ****ting down your throat, rightard. Why
would you want to deprive me of my daily fun kicking around you
rightards? Do you hate America?

George Plimpton May 30th 11 10:03 PM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.


I LOVE the smell of irony


You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your
immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears
juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.

Iarnrod May 31st 11 04:26 AM

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Correct All the Time, and Blimpton Agrees...
 
On May 30, 3:03*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

On 5/9/2011 5:00 AM,Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:45 pm, George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 9:42 PM, wrote:
In sci.skeptic George Blimpton wrote:
On 5/8/2011 8:39 PM,Iarnrod wrote:
On May 8, 10:22 am, George Blimpton wrote:
The snarky boy,who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.
I of course have never been wrong.
Always.
Why do you pretend to be a 60+ year old woman? You're not. You're
(nominally) a male, in your 20s or 30s. I know. We all know. What's
with the ****ing lame charade, boy?
Mother fixation.
It's some kind of psychological abnormality. I don't know if it's
treatable or not.

Well,

Well, why don't you **** off, boy?


I am having too much fun ****ting down your throat, rightard. Why
would you want to deprive me of my daily fun kicking around you
rightards? Do you hate America?

George Plimpton May 31st 11 04:56 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.


I LOVE the smell of irony


You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your
immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears
juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.

George Plimpton May 31st 11 04:56 AM

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 
On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:


On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:


On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:


On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...


On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...


If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .


Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm


You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!


Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!


WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?


This should be a good one..


--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs


You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.


I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!


OK.


http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...


That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


It proves everything,


It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.


"Boy!"


Correct.


You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.


I LOVE the smell of irony


You're a snarky boy. You're male - nominally - and due to your
immaturity, you're a boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears
juvenile demeanor, you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com