RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:

On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:

On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...

If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .

Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!

WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?

This should be a good one..

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs

You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.

I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!

OK.

http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...

That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

It proves everything,

It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

"Boy!"

Correct. You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. You're a boy -
not in doubt.

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have. The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker. You lose.
I win.

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On May 7, 3:55*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George *wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 6, 9:32 am, George * *wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 5, 11:56 am, * * *wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George * * *wrote:

On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:

On May 4, 3:22 pm, * * * *wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 3, 1:46 am, * * * *wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...

If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .

Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!

WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?

This should be a good one..

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs

You don't know your ass from your face. *Shut up.

I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!

OK.

http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...

That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

It proves everything,

It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

"Boy!"

Correct.

*You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything. *

I LOVE the smell of irony from the rightards!!

You're a boy -
not in doubt.

BWAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!! Blimpie... determined to be a ****-up to the very
end!!

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53 pm, George wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have.

No. His mother was the only citizen parent. Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.

If you think you can cite something showing that an unmarried
18-year-old American citizen giving birth abroad in 1961 would have
begat an American citizen, then cite it. Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On 5/7/2011 9:33 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, George wrote:
On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 4:39 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 2:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 6, 9:32 am, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 8:06 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 5, 11:56 am, wrote:
On May 5, 12:49 am, George wrote:

On 5/4/2011 9:32 PM, joeturn wrote:

On May 4, 3:22 pm, wrote:
In article7164e332-dfa2-471b-ad87-5e4b98a59956@
34g2000pru.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 3, 1:46 am, wrote:
In article093b7deb-3873-4fdf-9cbc-
, says...

If he had a legal birth certifricate he would not have to use bogus
Social Security Numbers .

Social Security Numbers are issued by Our Solvern Great Britain and a
British Subject cant get one.Only citizns of the United States are
held responsible for their bankruptcy debt to Great Briain.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretoath.htm

You understand how SS numbers are issued about as well as you understand
anything else....you don't. It's all just bull**** in, and insanity out.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

Sure I do they are given by Britain and British Subjects are assigned
temporary numbers only good for six months!

WTF? What does "Britain" have to do with SS numbers?

This should be a good one..

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They collect taxes from citizens of the United States called income
tax this is British tarriffs

You don't know your ass from your face. Shut up.

I think my ass would make you a Sunday face. Now you prove the British
dont own the USA and that the IRS is not their collection agency!

OK.

http://www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION...clarationscanb...

That doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

It proves everything,

It doesn't "prove" anything, boy.

"Boy!"

Correct.

You're a snarky boy, wrong about everything.

I LOVE the smell of irony

You're a snarky boy. You're male, and due to your immaturity, you're a
boy, and due to your snarky, wet-behind-the-ears juvenile demeanor,
you're a snarky boy - live with it, boy.

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a), paragraph 7 of the Immigration and
Naturalization Act of 1952, aka the McCarran-Walter Act, specifies which
children born abroad to parents of whom only one is an American citizen
is himself an American citizen:

The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State
at birth:

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the
United States
and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an
alien,
and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to
the birth
of such person, was physically present in the United States
or its
outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not
less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
of fourteen years


The snarky boy, "iaranrod", pretends that this only applies to to
children born to married couples, only one of whom is an American
citizen. The snarky boy then assumes that if the couple were not
legally married, then a child born to them would be a citizen. That's
*WRONG*. Section 309 actually places *greater* restrictions, not fewer,
on establishing the American citizenship of the child if the parents
were not married:

CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK:

Sec. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5) and (7) of
section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title
shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock
on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such
child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one
years by legitimation.

http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmi...stat%20163.pdf

So, regardless of whether or not Hussein's parents were married, he
would not have been born a citizen had he been born outside the
geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions:
regardless of his mother's marital status, she didn't meet the necessary
requirements for giving birth abroad to an American citizen under the
law effective in 1961: QED.

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

In 1961, a child born abroad to one alien parent and one American
citizen parent aged 18 or under would not be an American citizen. This
is not in rational dispute.

If Hussein Obama, the putative president of the US, were born abroad, he
would not be a citizen and therefore would be ineligible for election to
the presidency.

As Usual 'Larnrod' Gets It Wrong Again...
 

On May 7, 9:31*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

- Yes he would have.
- The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker.
- You lose.
- I win.

Larnrod,
Actually most US States {The USA] Do 'Recongnize'
"Bigamy" as a Crime.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigamy

Larnrod,
What most US States {The USA] Does Not 'Recongnize'
"Polygamy" : Being In Multiple Marriage at the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygam..._United_States

Larnrod : So much for you many un-ending assertions
of : "You lose. & I win."

it is simply logical... ~ RHF
-and-you-are-simply-'larnrod'-

"BO" The Anchor Baby ! -wrt- Obama The Child of an Illegitimate Father
 

On May 7, 9:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:

- - - Had Hussein been born abroad, he would
- - - not have been born a citizen under the law
- - - in effect in 1961.

- - Yes he would have.

- No. *His mother was the only citizen parent.
- Whether she was married or not, she didn't
- meet the residency requirement.
-
- If you think you can cite something showing
- that an unmarried 18-year-old American citizen
- giving birth abroad in 1961 would have begat an
- American citizen, then cite it.
-*Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

-read- An Illegitimate Child, an Illegitimate President
-by- Pamela Geller -source- World Net Daily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=294981
....was... BHO #1 an INS Person of Interest . . . in 1961
-more-questions-many-more-questions-lots-of-questions-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d77549ce53d23b

RANK FORGERY -- obama birth certificate!
 

On May 7, 10:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have.

No. *His mother was the only citizen parent. *Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.

Immaterial. You need to bone up on what we like to call "facts,"
Blimpie!

tee hee