Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote in
: On 5/24/2011 12:05 PM, RD Sandman wrote: John wrote in news:irgufi$l7$7@dont- email.me: On 5/24/2011 11:36 AM, RD Sandman wrote: John wrote in news:irgsdu$b0g$2@dont- email.me: On 5/24/2011 10:24 AM, RD Sandman wrote: John wrote in : On 5/24/2011 9:02 AM, gfn wrote: On May 24, 11:24 am, John wrote: On 5/24/2011 8:20 AM, gfn wrote: ... Where are some credible souces to back up any of that innuendo you keep attempting to push? Truth is, sure looks like the wealthiest 1% are not paying 42% of all of governments costs, and sure looks like the top 19% are not paying half of governments costs, until that happens they are NOT paying their fair share ... a flat tax can fix that ... Regards, JS I already said the tax data is at irs.gov Now, as for a flat tax I agree with you 100%. The one I advocate is the FairTax. Let me put this more bluntly. If I buy and item and pay 7% sales tax, the top one percent should buy an item and pay a 42.7% sales tax, that way they will be contributing their fair share to run government ... http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesam...er/wealth.html And how do you know that at the time of purchase? You set up a system which handles it ... where they pay their fair share of the cost of government. IOW, when buying a pack of gum at a Stop-N-Rob, you have to go through a check on your income so they know how much tax to charge? C'mon, even you can't be that stupid. The flat tax, the flat tax, I thought you would be able to catch on ... I was wrong. A flat tax is on income. It replaces the current method of calculating income tax by applying the same tax rate to all income not just wages and salaries. I gave an example of it here in this thread. Did you take the time to read it? It is really quite simply and quite short so you should have no problem understanding it. ![]() What you proposed above is a sales tax and it sure as hell isn't flat. A flat sales tax would be the same percentage on whatever was purchased and no matter who purchased it. You need to learn a bit more before you venture out into the real world. Everyone paying their fair share, this is how the discussion began, or, basically, everyone being equally taxed. Of course, even with a flat tax certain safeguards would have to be in place from preventing criminals from crimes which would allow them to ignore the taxes. See Al Capone. For example, a case where they made their dollars here and bought only foreign goods in mexico or canada ... it is a given, as soon as any fix, situation, solution, etc. is enacted, the criminals will come crawling out from under their rocks attempting to avoid it ... some of these safeguards to prevent this will have to be worked out as we catch the criminals ... Unfortunately, every discussion must begin on the premise that everyone is capable of realizing "common sense." At the bottom of the fair tax or fair tax is the real intent and sole purpose that all contribute equally and in direct relationship to how much they profit from business here. Just how is your fair tax different from your scenarios above. After all, you said folks would by only foreign goods from outside the US which avoids your fair tax. -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? | Shortwave | |||
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! | Shortwave | |||
Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity in financial mayhem | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! | Shortwave |