Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scout" wrote in
: "gfn" wrote in message . .. On May 27, 5:46 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote . com: On May 27, 3:35 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote innews:2bd8c587-d08d-465c-9e0a-ec529c2d92ba@ r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com: On May 27, 12:57 pm, RD Sandman wrote : gfn wrote innews:32f5e241-6e60-4d14-bfa8-cae2d3698f3e@ 24g2000yqk.googlegroups.com: On May 26, 8:06 pm, "Scout" wrote: "gfn" wrote in message oups .co m. .. On May 26, 4:04 pm, Gray Ghost wrote: gfn wrote in news:cd664af5-c0a8-4200-a50e-2cdb60b5a 031 @w21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com: On May 26, 3:20 pm, Gray Ghost wrote: gfn wrote in news:5e36036b-9c38-4449-8578- : Under the FairTax - wholesale = $50 - compliance costs = - $23 - FairTax = $23 - sales and other taxes = $27 - Grand total = $100 You are obviously a Democrat. Then Herman Cain must be too because he supports the FairTax. -- Herman Cain for President! http:// her man cain.c om/ If you don't support him you are a Racist!! He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer) Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as muc h ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT muc h competence? I refer to your math. wholesale = $50 compliance costs = - $23 FairTax = $23 sales and other taxes = $27 Unless they changed the rules of math by Congressionl decree that's $1 23. You can refer to my math, in return I will refer to your reading comprehension. Was there something about "- $23" (read minus $23) that you didn't get? I guess the example wasn't simple enough for you. Yep, and HOW exactly do you assume that compliance with sales and other taxes will suddenly be reduced to zero, when they will still need to comp ly and that it will cost absolutely NOTHING to comply with the additional FairTax imposed? You need to understand what compliance costs actually are. They are the costs associated with complying with the federal income tax on wages, regressive payroll taxes , the federal income tax on wages, i.e. measuring, tracking, sheltering, documenting, and filing our annual income.. If those taxes are gone then just what exactly is there left to comply with and how does that cost any money? There are also state compliance costs associated with state income taxes for employees, inventory taxes, license renewals, etc.. Fair tax does nothing about them. In addition you also have some compliance taxes fo r the operation of the Fair Tax....someone has to pay it. Because that has to do with state taxes. The FairTax is about federa l taxation. The point is that those costs are still there. They were somewhat amortized when combined with federal taxation but even if that goes away, the mechanisms of collecting those taxes don't. The costs of production are there. The costs of compliance are no longer there. They are for state and local reasons. The only thing that went away was the federal requirement. Some of those are also state costs and they have to remain in place along with the compliance costs that they incur. That hasn't changed. And once again, the fairtax replaces embedded costs of complying with FEDERAL tax laws. And where exactly does it say it will do exactly that? That part I agree with that the Fair Tax only addresses federal concerns. However, if that compliance mechanism for federal taxes and costs is also used for state taxes and costs, it and its accompanying costs cannot be removed. -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? | Shortwave | |||
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! | Shortwave | |||
Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity in financial mayhem | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! | Shortwave |