From another group:


===============================

The man behind the attacks is blond,blue-eyed Anders Behring Breivik ,32
year old, born on February 13, 1979, owns a Breivik Geofarm company and
describes himself as Conservative, Christian and Nationalist. A Twitter
account that Anders Behring Breivik started contains only one update
made on July 17, 2011 which reads:

One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only
interests.

According to the latest reports, Anders Behring Breivik killed at least
17 people, but there could be more as the investigation continues. Most
of the dead are 13 to 25 year old youth who participated at the
Norwegian Labour Party's Youth Camp (AUF) in Utøya. He is also linked to
the bombing in Oslo .


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOKkmYAAoJECGtZwCbtgwXyDcH/jtxE39qznFglQjOmHBCf7jU
MdStQD6v9POQAJtH1DG3/6qCXwIfv0szr1eglUKv/3UsqPzsC3sivgzBMbFI37BA
lU7zsyiS0YM/40TNzddKH9CRsMtSE78OSYHwz11gMi9tpODU0J7TNcbHwvfTug Th
gcpYMhEVKCL8mMXJuOMQxlIDVkx6TyM/JnUTVT8j1OThQH/RsbtnR8lEG1JPwNmK
wxB55zZM0KHoQ9OeWzdja5kdPiSN7YMbT3cZW7mGlFb+bL1owu ayZgd4j3AnPfLf
wLGzKcEVKQcGvPrAb4BhVV1Je6UHQGvU7lHIp0/6oel4OiptOZ7Bx8ZBi+kAyIE=
=pPXp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 07/22/2011 09:10 PM, m II wrote:

From another group:


===============================

The man behind the attacks is blond,blue-eyed Anders Behring Breivik ,32
year old, born on February 13, 1979, owns a Breivik Geofarm company and
describes himself as Conservative, Christian and Nationalist. A Twitter
account that Anders Behring Breivik started contains only one update
made on July 17, 2011 which reads:

One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only
interests.

According to the latest reports, Anders Behring Breivik killed at least
17 people, but there could be more as the investigation continues. Most
of the dead are 13 to 25 year old youth who participated at the
Norwegian Labour Party's Youth Camp (AUF) in Utøya. He is also linked to
the bombing in Oslo .

On Jul 22, 11:10*pm, m II wrote:
From another group:

http://www.thirdage.com/files/origin...rizona_314.jpg

On 7/23/2011 7:55 AM, N∅ M∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:
On Jul 22, 11:10 pm, m wrote:
From another group:

http://www.thirdage.com/files/origin...rizona_314.jpg

You have your pics mixed up, that is dave after 10 hits on his
SUPER_BONG_MASTER_5000!

Regards,
JS

"[...] he didn't belong to any known factions in Norway's small and
splintered extreme right movement, and had no criminal record except
for some minor offenses, the police official told AP."

"He hasn't been on our radar, which he would have been if was active
in the neo-Nazi groups in Norway"

"His main enemy is [...] multiculturalists and what he calls cultural
marxists."

Leon Trotsky in Norway

For a certain period of time, the Norwegian Labor Party belonged to
the Communist International. It then broke with the Comintern (and the
Comintern was not completely to blame for the rupture) without,
nevertheless, affiliating itself with the Second International, which
was too opportunistic for its taste. When this party came to power in
1935, it still felt some links with its past. I hastened to ask Oslo
for a visa, hoping to be able peacefully to pursue my literary work in
this calm country.

After some hesitation and some squabbling among the leaders of the
party, I was granted an entry visa. I gladly signed the agreement not
to intervene in the internal life of the country, etc., having no
intention whatsoever of becoming involved in Norwegian politics. From
my very first contacts with the leaders of the Labor Party, I got a
strong whiff of the stale odor of the musty conservatism denounced
with such vigor in Ibsen’s plays. It is true that the central organ of
the party, Arbeiderbladet, invoked Marx and Lenin, and not the Bible
and Luther, but it remained permeated with the shallow, well-meaning
mediocrity that inspired such unconquerable aversion in Marx and
Lenin.

The “Socialist” government made every effort to be as much like its
reactionary predecessors as it possibly could. The old bureaucracy, in
its entirety, stayed on. Was that good or bad? I soon had occasion to
become convinced, by experience, that the old bourgeois functionaries
sometimes have a broader viewpoint and a more profound sense of
dignity than Messrs. “Socialist” Ministers. With the exception of a
semi-official visit from Martin Tranmael, the leader of the Norwegian
Labor Party (who, during his stay in the United States, had – a
youthful abberation! – once belonged to the IWW), and from Trygve Lie,
the minister of justice, I had no personal relations with anyone in
government circles. I had almost no contact with the radicals, in
order to avoid even the appearance of mixing into local politics.

My wife and I lived in extreme isolation, without thinking of feeling
sorry for ourselves. A very friendly relationship was established with
the Knudsens, politics being, by tacit consent, excluded from our
conversations. During the moments of respite my illness afforded, I
worked on The Revolution Betrayed, trying to bring out clearly the
causes of the victory of the Soviet bureaucracy over the party, the
soviets, and the people, and to sketch perspectives for the subsequent
development of the USSR. On August 5 [1936] I sent the first copies of
the finished manuscript to the American and French translators. The
very same day, with Konrad Knudsen and his wife, we left for the south
of Norway, where we were to spend two weeks at the seashore. But the
following morning, while still en route, we learned that a group of
fascists had forced their way into the house to steal my archives. It
was not a hard thing to do: the house was not guarded – even the
closets and cupboards were kept unlocked. Norwegians are so accustomed
to the peaceful rhythm of their lives that we had not been able to get
our friends to take even the most elementary precautions.

The fascists arrived at midnight, displayed fake police badges, and
sought to begin the “house search” right away. Our hosts daughter
found this suspicious, did not lose her presence of mind, and stood
with arms outspread in front of the door to my room, declaring that
she would let no one enter. Five fascists, still inexperienced in this
kind of thing, found themselves put out of countenance by the courage
of a young girl. Meanwhile, her younger brother gave the alarm;
neighbors appeared on the scene in their nightclothes. The frightened
invaders fled, taking with them a few papers snatched at random from
the nearest table. The next day, and without difficulty, the police
established their identity.

It seemed that life would return to its usual calm. But, continuing
our journey to the south, we noticed that an automobile with four
fascists, led by the engineer N., their propaganda director, was
following us. We succeeded in getting rid of our pursuers only at the
end of the trip, by not letting their car onto the ferry that was to
take us to the other side of the fjord. We spent ten very peaceful
days in the solitary fisherman’s cottage built on the rocks of the
tiny island.

http://www.MARXISTS.org/archive/trotsky/1936/12/nor.htm

You can't hide in your closet any longer.
We all know how Marxists like you must confuse the ignorant masses
with twisted lies in order to win them over.

Give it up! - Even your former handlers have seen the light:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj0Id...eature=related

We now use the internet to turn the spot light on the likes of you:

http://AgendaDocumentary.com

The Europeans have exposed your NAZI "teeth in gum" relationship with
the Communist Party:

http://www.SovietStory.com

Hitler learned from your kind very well and the result predictable.
Your murders continue to be counted and documented:

http://www.GlobalMuseumOnCommunism.org
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DALeSSXXgI
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIHQI8UVEug

Video: Death Threats Against Wis. Republicans (Content Warning)

http://moonbattracker.com/wordpress/?p=479
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQg-fYwaoZM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...nion_take.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9NPPkK232k

Fascist Union Thug's Death Threats in Wisconsin

http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/20...-for-civility/
http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/art...-death-threats
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...murdock?page=1

Fascist Union Activist to WI State Senators: You Will Die

http://www.nrtwc.org/union-activist-...-you-will-die/
http://www.620wtmj.com/shows/charlie...63.html?blog=y

Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].

..........................sound..familiar?........ .................

Anyone who is NOT a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.
Anyone who refutes a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a moron according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.

As socialistworker.org admits, http://socialistworker.org/2003-2/47..._Fascism.shtml
the left routinely applies the term "fascist" to any Republican
political leader. In Britain The Guardian, BBC, and other liberal
media pounced on purported links between the Bush family and
corporations that had dealings with Nazi Germany. The fact that
Prescott Bush, George W. Bush's grandfather, was a "director and
shareholder" with companies that had indirect financial dealings with
Germany in the 1930s would hardly seem damning, however. Much the
same could be said for many other affluent individuals in America or
Britain at the time. Every American today with mutual fund holdings
is invested, at least indirectly, in Hugo Chavez's Venezuela. Does
that make them Marxist revolutionaries?

Talk of Hitler became a lot more common during the Bush years, when it
was accepted wisdom on the left that George Bush was worse than
Hitler. Then there was Nancy Pelosi, who spent weeks back in 2010
complaining of the Tea Party's so-called "swastika signs" -- signs
that did not signal an alliance with fascism but opposition to it.
Pelosi was hardly alone in accusing the Tea Party of fascism. Marc
Rubin, writing for examiner.com, referred to Tea Party members as
"text book fascists." He went on to pin the neo-fascist label on Tom
Tancredo, presumably because of Tancredo's concerns over illegal
immigration. If those concerns make Tancredo a fascist, they would
make the majority of Americans who share those concerns fascists as
well. But that's pretty much how the left sees America.

The immediate response of liberals such as Chris Matthews
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110412110017.aspx to the Ryan
"Path to Prosperity" was to characterize it as a killer not just of
babies and old people but of "half the people who watch this show."
This attempt to portray the GOP plan as genocidal is just another
example of the fascist rhetoric. It appears that Matthews is
attempting to portray the Ryan plan as some sort of Final Solution.

It's not just loose cannons on MSNBC who resort to fascist innuendo.
Obama's speechwriters are good at crafting sinister suggestions even
without using the "F" word. Obama's budget speech of April 13
actually set the tone for the current debate. With Rep. Ryan sitting
on the front row, Obama lectured his audience that the GOP plan would
kick "someone's grandparents" out of nursing homes and cause children
with autism and Down's syndrome to "fend for themselves." It is well
known that Hitler sent legions of the disabled to concentration camps
to be gassed, but the suggestion that a plan to actually save Medicare
and Medicaid resembles the Holocaust, if that is what Obama intended,
is repellent. It was one more proof, as if we needed any more, of a
fatal weakness in the character of this President. He is a man whose
entire existence is devoted to gutter politics. For such a man,
statesmanship and dignified leadership are inconceivable.

The plan truth is that America can no longer afford this sort of
reckless partisanship on the part of the chief executive. The fact
that Obama disagrees with Rep. Ryan's budget plan does not justify
accusations of killing sick children or tossing old folks out on the
street. That kind of rhetoric may pass for wit in the sixth grade,
but it is juvenile coming from the President.

THIS IS LIBERAL FASCISM

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk
Pt.5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0
Pt.6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk
Pt.7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q
Pt.8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf39ZtLVa4A

If you haven't read the book, watched all of the above and understood
what was said, don't bother responding with your public UNION, LIBERAL
FASCIST, JackAss Idiot, Communist Party propaganda lies.

LIBERAL FASCIST Left-wing roots of the Nazis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k

LIBERAL FASCISM, Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche
[N.Korea] are left-wing brothers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ

NAZI Origins of LIBERAL FASCISTS Global Warming - While this may sound
odd to many who have bought into the Marxian propaganda over the years
that the Nazis were right wing capitalistic extremists, Greens who
signed up for the Nazi Party were actually very typical of the day.
Between 60% and 70% of the German Greens were NAZI Party members,
compared to only 10% of the population at large.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...pocalypti.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...vironazis.html

LIBERAL FASCISTS and NAZIs ARE Allies:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-URfx_k9uU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XrscWjPYs

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ

The LIBERAL FASCIST Path to Socialism:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk

"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to
radical Islam."

"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."

[...]

"The fundamental dogma of all brands of socialism and communism is
that the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery,
oppression, degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it
enriches a class of idle and useless parasites."

"This doctrine was not the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed
long before Marx entered the scene. Its most successful propagators
were not the Marxian authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the
British Fabians, the German professors and the American
Institutionalists. And it is a very significant fact that the
correctness of this dogma was contested only by a few economists who
were very soon silenced and barred from access to the universities,
the press, the leadership of political parties and, first of all,
public office. Public opinion by and large accepted the condemnation
of capitalism without any reservation."

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - http://mises.org/midroad.asp

[...]

"The term 'planning' is mostly used as a synonym for socialism,
communism, and authoritarian and totalitarian economic management.
Sometimes only the German pattern of socialism-Zwangswirtschaft-is
called planning, while the term socialism proper is reserved for the
Russian pattern of outright socialization and bureaucratic operation
of all plants, shops, and farms. At any rate, planning in this sense
means all-around planning by the government and enforcement of these
plans by the police power. Planning in this sense means full
government control of business. It is the antithesis of free
enterprise, private initiative, private ownership of the means of
production, market economy, and the price system. Planning and
capitalism are utterly incompatible. Within a system of planning
production is conducted according to the government's orders, not
according to the plans of capitalists and entrepreneurs eager to
profit by best filling the wants of the consumers.

"But the term planning is also used in a second sense. Lord Keynes,
Sir William Beveridge, Professor Hansen, and many other eminent men
assert that they do not want to substitute totalitarian slavery for
freedom. They declare that they are planing for a free society. They
recommend a third system, which, as they say, is as far from socialism
as it is from capitalism, which, as a third solution of the problem of
society's economic organization, stands midway between the two other
systems, and while retaining the advantages of both, avoids the
disadvantages inherent in each.

"These self-styled progressives are certainly mistaken when they
pretend that their proposals are new and unheard of. The idea of this
third solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since
baptized it with a pertinent name; they call it interventionism.
Hardly anybody can doubt that history will link the idea of social
security, more closely than with the American New Deal and with Sir
William Beveridge, with the memory of Bismarck whom our fathers did
not precisely describe as a liberal. All the essential ideas of
present-day interventionist progressivism were neatly expounded by the
supreme brain-trusters of imperial Germany, Professors Schmoller and
Wagner, who at the same time urged their Kaiser to invade and to
conquer the Americas. Far be it from me to condemn any idea only on
account of its not being new. But as the progressives slander all
their opponents as old-fashioned, orthodox, and reactionary, it is
expedient to observe that it would be more appropriate to speak of the
clash of two orthodoxies; the Bismarck orthodoxy versus the Jefferson
orthodoxy.

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - 1952 - http://mises.org/books/planningforfreedom_mises.pdf

The origins of the modern left can be traced back to the famous
passage in Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of
Inequality, in which he condemned the institution of private
property:

“The first man, who after enclosing a piece of ground, took it into
his head to say, ‘this is mine,’ and found people simple enough to
believe him, was the real founder of civil society.”

Added Rousseau: “How many crimes, how many wars, how many murders, how
many misfortunes and horrors, would that man have saved the human
species, who pulling up the stakes or filling up the ditches should
have cried to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you
are lost, if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong equally to
us all, and the earth itself to nobody!”

Around the 1830s, a faction of French liberals gravitated toward
Romanticism and the philosophy of the late Rousseau, proclaiming that
capitalism, private property, and the increasing complexity of modern
society were agents of moral decay -- both for the individual and for
society at large. This is essentially the worldview that has made its
way, through history, into the collective mind of the modern left; it
is a worldview calling for a revolution that not only will topple the
existing capitalist order and punish its corrupt leaders, but that
also will replace that order with a socialist regime where the utopian
ideals of perfect justice and equality will reign. Such an ambition
can be put into effect only by a totalitarian state with the authority
to micromanage every facet of human life, precisely the end-point
toward which the policies and crusades of the modern left are
directed.

When the term “liberalism” (from the Latin word liberalis, meaning
“pertaining to a free man”) first emerged in the early 1800s, its
hallmarks were a belief in individual rights, the rule of law, limited
government, private property, and laissez faire economics. These would
remain the defining characteristics of liberalism throughout the
liberal epoch (generally identified as the period of 1815-1914). Yet
the modern left, which portrays itself as the agent of enlightened
commitment to “liberal” causes, in fact stands for the antithesis of
each of the foregoing liberal ideals. Contrary to its self-definition,
the left is neither “liberal” nor “progressive,” but rather a
reactionary force that seeks to resurrect the traditions that
characterized the epoch which preceded the rise of classical
liberalism.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ry.asp?id=1217

On 7/22/2011 9:10 PM, m II wrote:

From another group:


===============================

The man behind the attacks is blond,blue-eyed Anders Behring Breivik ,32
year old, born on February 13, 1979, owns a Breivik Geofarm company and
describes himself as Conservative, Christian and Nationalist. A Twitter
account that Anders Behring Breivik started contains only one update
made on July 17, 2011 which reads:

One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only
interests.

According to the latest reports, Anders Behring Breivik killed at least
17 people, but there could be more as the investigation continues. Most
of the dead are 13 to 25 year old youth who participated at the
Norwegian Labour Party's Youth Camp (AUF) in Utøya. He is also linked to
the bombing in Oslo .


False flag operation if I ever did see one. It was a holiday, the
government buildings were closed ... real terrorists don't bomb closed
buildings when the employees, clients, etc. are on holiday!

Regards,
JS

On 7/23/2011 3:08 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 7/22/2011 9:10 PM, m II wrote:



False flag operation if I ever did see one. It was a holiday, the
government buildings were closed ... real terrorists don't bomb closed
buildings when the employees, clients, etc. are on holiday!

Regards,
JS

On Jul 23, 7:26*pm, dave wrote:
On 7/23/2011 3:08 PM, John Smith wrote:



On 7/22/2011 9:10 PM, m II wrote:

False flag operation if I ever did see one. It was a holiday, the
government buildings were closed ... real terrorists don't bomb closed
buildings when the employees, clients, etc. are on holiday!

Regards,
JS- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Must be an exception to the 'happy camper' crowd . There is always an
exception ! Another lunatic. . .