Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/15/11 17:47 , Don Kirkman wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:04:46 -0700, John wrote: The rest of what you had to say, bad decisions, paying too much for a home, etc. ... well ya', that is covered in "Life 101." If you missed that class, problems will keep arising until you do take that class! ... don't make those bad decisions, don't pay too much for over valued property, don't buy what you can't afford, etc. You ignore the people who were *told* they could afford the houses they bought. People with a duty to be diligent--brokers, financiers, investment houses, all assured them that they deserved a good house and by heck they could afford one because they were given them a real bargain. Basically, it comes down to common sense, if you can't afford the house, don't buy it... yet ... But if you're assured that you can afford it, who is the real culprit here? When I bought my last house, I carefully constructed the budget. When I got to the financing stage, every carrier I spoke with pushed like mad to get me to take a non-traditional mortgage for far more than I'd considered, with variable interest, balloon payments, and 'creative' structures, all based on the assumption that 1) I'd be selling the property at a substantial profit within 5 years and 2) incomes always rise. I resisted, and stayed with a 30 year fixed at the interest that I'd shopped around for. And was told that rate was no longer available, so the non-traditional was my only option. They sold it hard. "You should buy the maximum amount of house you can possibly afford, and you can afford this." "You're upwardly mobile, you'll be selling to upgrade before the interest rates increase and make a bundle in the process." "You won't be in the house by the time the balloon comes due." Even going so far as to tell me that at my age, a traditional 30 year fixed would simply not be available. But that a 15 year ARM was a virtual certainty to be approved, at nearly 50% more than I'd planned to borrow. I eventually found the mortgage I wanted, at the rate I wanted, and when things collapsed in the housing market, and the economy slowed, I had both equity and a payment I could manage. But it was a fight to the death to get a lender to agree to the traditional mortgage. Few go into this kind of transaction with a fierce determination to do things his own way. Most I've encountered would be quickly swayed by both the temptation of more house than they thought they could afford, or the enticing finance opportunity when so reassured by the lending agency that the risk is small, and the benefits so great. Now, I'm not, by a long shot, opposed to creative financing. I've been quite creative in financing my businesses. And a couple of really nice cars. But only in the short term, and only for small, manageable amounts of money. Specifically, so I'd be prepared as economic fortunes change. So, though I'm hardly one of those 'invade Wall Street' protest types, who blames all ills in the universe of Man on the banking system, I can say that I've seen first hand some of the more underhanded, and manipulative behaviours that have led a lot of folk down a very turbulent river. So, yes: Who is the culprit, indeed. p |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama creates 200 new jobs! | Shortwave | |||
Obama creates 200 new jobs! | Shortwave | |||
Disabilities and jobs in broadcasting | Broadcasting | |||
Obama creates 30,000 jobs with $787 Billion tax dollars | Shortwave | |||
American Trauma: Jobs and the Economy | Shortwave |