EiBi Skeds Updated
 

239 countries heard and 225 QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) using the
NASWA Country List.

I'm astounded that, after nearly a decade, you still put the "veried"
slam on your sig. It shows you for the person you obviously are.

The bulletin of the National Radio Club, DX News, is available online,
going back to the 40's. This, the premiere AM DX club in North
America, has had a "Verie Signer" column for about 7 decades. The
"Musings of the Members" section is full of references to "veries"
with vastly fewer references to "QSLs" (and said references are nearly
always to cards, not letters, with letters being the standard for AM
verifications of reception).

RaDex, the premiere DX and listener magazine in the 20's, 30's and
first few years of the 40's has frequent mentions of "veries:" About
110 Radex issues are available at www.americanradiohistory.com in the
Radex section.

"Verie" is the standard nomenclature for AM / Medium wave
verifications of reception in North America.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

radiodavid wrote:

239 countries heard and 225 QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) using the
NASWA Country List.

I'm astounded that, after nearly a decade, you still put the "veried"
slam on your sig. It shows you for the person you obviously are.

A far better person than you, clown 'tard.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.


On Mar 12, 2:47*am, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
239 countries heard and 225 QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) using the
NASWA Country List.

I'm astounded that, after nearly a decade, you still put the "veried"
slam on your sig. It shows you for the person you obviously are.

A far better person than you, clown 'tard.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

radiodavid wrote:

As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 12, 2:06*pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

Heck, RaDex magazine even had a column by "Count de Veries" about,
natch, verifications.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

radiodavid wrote:

On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 13, 4:42*am, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 13, 1:03*pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42*am, dxAce wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

radiodavid wrote:

On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, dxAce wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Drake R7, R8, R8A and R8B
70' and 200' wires
GE SR I (2) and II

239 countries heard and 225 QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) using the
NASWA Country List.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On 3/15/12 16:08 , dxAce wrote:


radiodavid wrote:

On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.



Wholly unfair to clown 'tards, Steve.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 15, 2:08*pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, dxAce wrote:

radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I rest my case... there are hundreds of thousands of pages of NNRC,
IRCA, NRC and other club bulletins referring to "veries" as the
accepted term for AM verifications as well as countless magazine
articles, columns and references. Of course, the facts would get in
the way of your obstinate point of view. Just out of curiosity, has
anyone actually seen the QSLs for your claimed 225 confirmed
countries? You protest proven facts way too much to be for real.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 19, 10:37*pm, radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 15, 2:08*pm, dxAce wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, dxAce wrote:

radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I rest my case... there are hundreds of thousands of pages of NNRC,
IRCA, NRC and other club bulletins referring to "veries" as the
accepted term for AM verifications as well as countless magazine
articles, columns and references. Of course, the facts would get in
the way of your obstinate point of view. Just out of curiosity, has
anyone actually seen the QSLs for your claimed 225 confirmed
countries? You protest proven facts way too much to be for real.

Yes, you've clearly "moved on". I can tell that you have no chip on
your shoulder whatsoever.