Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Ross Archer wrote:
On Monday, December 1, 2014 6:32:45 AM UTC-8, dave wrote: Direct conversion is all the rage these days. Or Direct conversion to I/Q quadrature directly into a DSP. A crystal radio is direct conversion so I guess we are back where we started (except now we have the DSP). How would you do quadrature at baseband? Two VCOs both digitally controlled and 90 degrees out of phase, or some witchcraft on the baseband signal itself? I think his wording is throwing you off. If they just convert to audio, there's now way to get rid of the audio image. All the digital filtering in the world can't get rid of it, because it's in the same area as the wanted signal. If you convert with two mixers and an oscillator with two outputs, 90 degrees apart, you get two audio channels. The digital processing can make use of that, and knock out the unwanted image. It's just a more modern version of the phasing method of sideband rejection (once upon a time common in SSB transmitters, and often used as external devices to improve sideband reception on existing receivers when SSB was new. But instead of an audio phasing network after the two mixers (which is what was used in all those sideband slicers in the fifties), digital audio processing takes care of the audio phase network and can do a lot more. What sometimes happens is they use the same scheme, but convert to a very low IF. There, the two channels are used to get rid of the RF image, which is relatively close to the signal since the IF is often below 100KHz, but somewhere above audio. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hottest reggae online 24/7 | Broadcasting | |||
The LAFD identifies the hottest holiday gifts! | Scanner |