![]() |
AOR 7030 and 7030Plus. Substantial differences?
Hallo,
sorry for my terrible English. I program to change (or to upgrade) my 7030 with 7030+. Are there important differences between two? I refer to the general quality of listening, to the IP2&IP3, to the noise. The greatest number of memories or the alfatag characters doesn't interest me. Has someone tried both side by side? I ask this because I have read conflicting opinions. Some say that are not differences and others that 7030+ is very better. Very thanks. Gerry Tods |
|
I have an AOR7030...........it isn't a bad unit, but after a few years,
silly problems show up, such as.................switches that have debouncing problems, a cheap mechanical encoder that seems to have noise problems; this problem could have been cleaned up with an XOR function in the microcontroller. The performance of both of the units is pretty similar, otherwise, unless you are in a very strong signal area. AOR addressed the IP problem by switching to shielded leaded inductors in the front end filters, so IP3 in the transition region is slightly improved. The reason for the improvement is because the original inductors' cores saturated at high signal levels. This change didn't really make any real difference in the midband regions of the filters. I am not sure why they didn't go to bandpass filters the way the other manufacturers chose to do. AOR chose to remove the shielding from the synthesizer, so one of the prominent users (Dave Zantos) observed a problem with "white noise" superimposed on the received signal with the "Plus" model. On a final note, you can't go wrong with either one. When I phoned one of the distributers, and asked them the differences between the two models, the person I spoke to merely parroted AOR's advertised specifications. In other words, they really didn't provide a satisfactory answer. If it were a choice between the two units, I would probably go for the "Plus" model, because it does use the optical encoder for the main tuning; still, they still use those cheap, failure-prone mechanical encoders for the other functions. It may sound like I have a very negative view of this receiver, but I really don't. I just think that for the price, it should be more reliable. There are two reasons that I am still keeping mine.........................first of all, it was a Christmas gift from my wife, and secondly, it is really a fun receiver, with all of those menu functions. Pete Telamon wrote in message .... In article , (Gerry) wrote: Hallo, sorry for my terrible English. I program to change (or to upgrade) my 7030 with 7030+. Are there important differences between two? I refer to the general quality of listening, to the IP2&IP3, to the noise. The greatest number of memories or the alfatag characters doesn't interest me. Has someone tried both side by side? I ask this because I have read conflicting opinions. Some say that are not differences and others that 7030+ is very better. Very thanks. You are mixing apples and oranges a little bit as the ³more memories² and ³Alfa tag² is the result of the FPU7030 option. Specifically the plus unit has added or improved: IP2&IP3 Lower noise synthesizer Improved antenna input transformer Improved IF filters Optical instead of mechanical encoder for the main tuning knob Includes the FPU7030 option If you were to do this I would also go for the NB7030 option. The auto notch works real nice and the noise blanker sometimes helps. I canıt help you with a before and after as I bought the radio upgraded. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com