The insidiousness of gays
 

Our culture becomes ever enamored with the gay life style, declaring
Catholic Priests as child molesters rather than gay, lest it tarnish the
gay image, but refusing to document fervid attempts by some in the gay
community to lower the age of consent for adult/child sexual relationships.
Where is the mention in the mainstream media of NAMBLA, (North American man
boy love association)?

We now have the first gay bishop in the Episcopalian church, proudly
stating that his homosexuality was a call from God, that his heterosexual
marriage was nullified in the presence of the Eucharist, he therefore knew
that God has had a change of mind, apparently preferring the trends of
mankind to his own eternal ways.

Sorry folks, the idea of one man mounting another man, hairy back and all,
from the rear, then commencing to use his rectum as a sexual organ should
be offensive to all. Folks, we aren't given the visual imagery of a feces
coated penis being casually draped on the sheets after the so called
consummation of the act. We aren't shown (banish the thought) of men
marching in parades, parades that they sue to have the right to march in,
men wearing bras and panties, dressed in almost unimaginable ways. We
aren't told of Gay Days at Disneyland, comprised not of respectable people
enjoying themselves regardless of their sexual preferences, but sick and
deprived people engaging simulated sex acts, engaging in public nudity,
fondling themselves in front of the remainder of the unsuspecting public, a
public somehow delusional, believing those advertisement spots on TV
advocating that you take your children to Disneyland for some wholesome
fun.

We are shown images of very nice gay guys and women, great neighbors,
concerned about the community, suffering from the outrages of unfounded
bigotry. The problem is that many of us believe this, and are equally
willing to believe that all Christians are zealots, dangerous rightwing
fanatics, rhapsodically reverberating, hands in the air, speaking in
tongues, falling to their knees in prayer.

Who sets these images? The media. Who is saturated beyond belief with gays?
(no, it's not the Catholic church), The Media!

I seriously doubt that gays comprise more than 2% of the U.S. population.
There are many many more gun owners than gays. Who is represented favorably
on TV and in the media? Gays. Who is represented as crazed rightwing
extremists with the IQ of a mentally retarded squirrel? Gun owners. Who do
the politicians coddle to, gays? Who do the politicians screw (some gays,
literally I'm sure) gun owners?

Brought to you by the Northern Office of the Families Against Gay Sex (NO-
FAGS)

Yeah but what about gay gun owners?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"NO-FAGS" wrote in message
...

I seriously doubt that gays comprise more than 2% of the U.S. population.
There are many many more gun owners than gays. Who is represented
favorably
on TV and in the media? Gays. Who is represented as crazed rightwing
extremists with the IQ of a mentally retarded squirrel? Gun owners. Who
do
the politicians coddle to, gays? Who do the politicians screw (some gays,
literally I'm sure) gun owners?

Brought to you by the Northern Office of the Families Against Gay Sex
(NO-
FAGS)

.... and gay shortwave listeners. Oh My! Will they contaminate propogation
conditions as well by their very presence?

Hey as they say in New York -- Foo Get Bout it.

99.99999 Percent of the Shortwave readers here won't even open up a post
like this or they filter them out.

I opened it up just to let you know I never open up Off Topics. Most do
likewise. You are only wasting your time and NG Bandwidth

It is not your cause I object to -- pro or con. But rather IT HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH SHORTWAVE RADIO (Please read twice)

Please show some consideration and take it else where. Lots of NG's for this
sort of thing. And you will get folks who ARE interested in your cause --
some sympathetic. Here we just don't care and don't want to see it.

But I do object to your graphic descriptions -- they are horrid, not fit for
children, or any one else.
Would you talk to your Grandmother, Mother, Little Sister in this disgusting
manner ???


"NO-FAGS" wrote in message
...
Our culture becomes ever enamored with the gay life style, declaring
Catholic Priests as child molesters rather than gay, lest it tarnish the
gay image, but refusing to document fervid attempts by some in the gay
community to lower the age of consent for adult/child sexual
relationships.
Where is the mention in the mainstream media of NAMBLA, (North American
man
boy love association)?

We now have the first gay bishop in the Episcopalian church, proudly
stating that his homosexuality was a call from God, that his heterosexual
marriage was nullified in the presence of the Eucharist, he therefore knew
that God has had a change of mind, apparently preferring the trends of
mankind to his own eternal ways.

Sorry folks, the idea of one man mounting another man, hairy back and all,
from the rear, then commencing to use his rectum as a sexual organ should
be offensive to all. Folks, we aren't given the visual imagery of a feces
coated penis being casually draped on the sheets after the so called
consummation of the act. We aren't shown (banish the thought) of men
marching in parades, parades that they sue to have the right to march in,
men wearing bras and panties, dressed in almost unimaginable ways. We
aren't told of Gay Days at Disneyland, comprised not of respectable people
enjoying themselves regardless of their sexual preferences, but sick and
deprived people engaging simulated sex acts, engaging in public nudity,
fondling themselves in front of the remainder of the unsuspecting public,
a
public somehow delusional, believing those advertisement spots on TV
advocating that you take your children to Disneyland for some wholesome
fun.

We are shown images of very nice gay guys and women, great neighbors,
concerned about the community, suffering from the outrages of unfounded
bigotry. The problem is that many of us believe this, and are equally
willing to believe that all Christians are zealots, dangerous rightwing
fanatics, rhapsodically reverberating, hands in the air, speaking in
tongues, falling to their knees in prayer.

Who sets these images? The media. Who is saturated beyond belief with
gays?
(no, it's not the Catholic church), The Media!

I seriously doubt that gays comprise more than 2% of the U.S. population.
There are many many more gun owners than gays. Who is represented
favorably
on TV and in the media? Gays. Who is represented as crazed rightwing
extremists with the IQ of a mentally retarded squirrel? Gun owners. Who
do
the politicians coddle to, gays? Who do the politicians screw (some gays,
literally I'm sure) gun owners?

Brought to you by the Northern Office of the Families Against Gay Sex
(NO-
FAGS)

"Brian Denley" wrote in message news:lQtZa.113895$o%2.49508@sccrnsc02...
Yeah but what about gay gun owners?

Who do, of course, exist. Gratuitous link:
http://www.pinkpistols.org

I expect the original poster's head will explode as he tries to
comprehend this concept.

NO-FAGS wrote:

Our culture becomes ever enamored with the gay life style, declaring
Catholic Priests as child molesters rather than gay,
Because they are child molestors. You're just too much of
an idiot to understand the concept of a subset.
For example, all of the following statements are true:

Baptists molest children
Christians are murderers
Heterosexuals are rapists
Homosexuals own firearms

So your point is destroyed. Next?

lest it tarnish the
gay image, but refusing to document fervid attempts by some in the gay

By SOME. Some usenet posters drink their own urine.
Therefore, I conclude
you drink your own urine.

You are an idiot. Next.

community to lower the age of consent for adult/child sexual relationships.
Where is the mention in the mainstream media of NAMBLA, (North American man
boy love association)?

Being a tiny fringe group, among zillions of fringe groups,
perhaps it's not important enough?

Next?


We now have the first gay bishop in the Episcopalian church, proudly
stating that his homosexuality was a call from God, that his heterosexual
marriage was nullified in the presence of the Eucharist, he therefore knew
that God has had a change of mind, apparently preferring the trends of
mankind to his own eternal ways.

An opinion. He's entitled to have one.


Sorry folks, the idea of one man mounting another man, hairy back and all,
from the rear, then commencing to use his rectum as a sexual organ should
be offensive to all.

Why? I'll spare the NG graphic descriptions of messy
heterosexual practices and fluids.

It's a free country. Get over it already. You have no say
in what homosexuals OR heterosexuals do in bed.
You can only speak for yourself. And being as you're a
proven idiot, why do you bother?

Folks, we aren't given the visual imagery of a feces
coated penis being casually draped on the sheets after the so called
consummation of the act.

Your ignorance is astounding. You apparently have never
heard of the general practice of washing oneself out rather
extensively with water. As far as I know, this is nearly
universal. There is no fecal matter to speak of.
Typical ignorant liar.

We aren't shown (banish the thought) of men
marching in parades, parades that they sue to have the right to march in,
Because they DO have the right

men wearing bras and panties, dressed in almost unimaginable ways.
It's none of your business. Shut up about it. You have no
control, no say, no right to interfere.
Go find something useful to do with your life, like put a
bullet in your head.

We
aren't told of Gay Days at Disneyland,

Funny, I've read that in the papers. Where did YOU hear
about it, that "we aren't told"?
Maybe you're just lying? Yup, that's it.

comprised not of respectable people
enjoying themselves regardless of their sexual preferences, but sick and
deprived people engaging simulated sex acts, engaging in public nudity,
fondling themselves in front of the remainder of the unsuspecting public, a
public somehow delusional, believing those advertisement spots on TV
advocating that you take your children to Disneyland for some wholesome
fun.
I suppose you were there in person, and have a really
accurate sampling of behavior?
Or maybe you just saw footage depicting fringe activity,
which you are now lyingly trying
to represent as typical?

Being as you're a proven idiot AND a liar... what more can
you say?

We are shown images of very nice gay guys and women, great neighbors,
concerned about the community, suffering from the outrages of unfounded
bigotry.

Because that's very often exactly true.

The problem is that many of us believe this,

Because it's very often true. Get used to it. That's how
the majority will believe, and there's nothing you can do to
change the awakening of truth vs. your lies.

and are equally
willing to believe that all Christians are zealots, dangerous rightwing
fanatics, rhapsodically reverberating, hands in the air, speaking in
tongues, falling to their knees in prayer.

You certainly sound like one of those kooks!

Who sets these images? The media. Who is saturated beyond belief with gays?
(no, it's not the Catholic church), The Media!

Really? Huh. A few TV shows have gay characters. Methinks
you protest too much.

I seriously doubt that gays comprise more than 2% of the U.S. population.

What you believe is irrelevant, and at least on this issue,
quite obviously most often wrong.

There are many many more gun owners than gays. Who is represented favorably
on TV and in the media? Gays. Who is represented as crazed rightwing
extremists with the IQ of a mentally retarded squirrel? Gun owners. Who do
the politicians coddle to, gays? Who do the politicians screw (some gays,
literally I'm sure) gun owners?

Maybe because gun owners aren't unfairly persecuted, fired
for no reason, attacked by groups of thugs, etc.
Wrap your feeble mind around that one.


Brought to you by the Northern Office of the Families Against Gay Sex (NO-
FAGS)

Clever. Thinking that out must have caused a sprain in your
brain. :)

If you're going to be a filthy liar, at least be a
convincing one.

-- Ross