Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear "Dr. Artaud:"
You limit your defamation to Amateur Astronomers. I have known many astronomers, both radio and optical astronomers, and I observed virtually none who could possibly be classified as "quite dysfunctional personality wise." Those few may simply have been shy. This anonymous bit of defamation should be disregarded. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Dr. Artaud" wrote in message snip You wouldn't happen to be an Amateur Astronomer, would you? When I used to be into the hobby, I noticed that many of the Amateurs were quite dysfunctional personality wise. (I know that in my case it's kind of like the kettle calling the pot black, figuratively, of course). Dr. Artaud |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. McLaughlin" wrote in
: On a planet of insane people, the sane man must appear insane. If you are intimate with the likes of amateur astronomers, you would hardly be in the position of being able to judge their character. Not to mention that your post, once again as in the post I originally replied to, attempts to "rate or judge" the suitability for other readers. If I were you, I would quickly add me to your plonk file and not bother yourself with the need to protect others. I have observed quite a few seriously dysfunctional amateur astronomers, they usually aren't the type that casually fit in with the masses. As Carl Jung would have explained, they honed their technical abilities at the expense of their personality. This he refers to as differentiation. He depicts this as a cross like structure, with thinking and feeling at opposite ends of one axis, and sensation and intuition at opposite ends of the other axis. He feels, as I do, that when you are differentiated into thinking, you progressively exclude feeling. These amateur astronomers are emasculated, quite awkward at dealing with women, quite oblivious to the needs of others, save for others involved in similar endeavors. Though they ostensibly appear male (some are female, nothing to write home about), they respond towards attractive women visiting the observatory as if they (the astronomers) are about 12 years old. I read your post to my wife, she broke out laughing. The idea that you feel that amateur astronomers aren't dysfunctional was too much for her to handle. She has likewise seen the dysfunction in these people. We used to belong to the AAAP, Amateur Astronomers Association of Pittsburgh, http://trfn.clpgh.org/aaap/ "With over 500 members, it is one of the larger astronomy clubs in the nation.." http://trfn.clpgh.org/aaap/images/brashear.jpg You take umbrage because I mentioned amateur astronomers as dysfunctional, but in your zeal to find fault, you made an improper assumption, i.e. that I find the dysfunction only with them. Quite the contrary, model railroaders, HAM radio operators, remote control model enthusiasts, computer geeks, these all have decent populations that are dysfunctional, as do other more technical hobbies that do not currently come to mind. You also missed that my point of "the kettle calling the pot black". I mentioned this since I also believe that I fall into the dysfunctional category. So what? "Use the plonk file Luke", let the NG fend for themselves. Sincerely, a former dysfunctional amateur astronomer and a somewhat less (not very much less though) dysfunctional shortwave listener. Dr. Artaud Dear "Dr. Artaud:" You limit your defamation to Amateur Astronomers. I have known many astronomers, both radio and optical astronomers, and I observed virtually none who could possibly be classified as "quite dysfunctional personality wise." Those few may simply have been shy. This anonymous bit of defamation should be disregarded. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Dr. Artaud" wrote in message snip To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative. You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is immovable, lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the fist of the all or nothing." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doc.
Take your Ritalin. -- Stinger "Dr. Artaud" wrote in message ... "J. McLaughlin" wrote in : On a planet of insane people, the sane man must appear insane. If you are intimate with the likes of amateur astronomers, you would hardly be in the position of being able to judge their character. Not to mention that your post, once again as in the post I originally replied to, attempts to "rate or judge" the suitability for other readers. If I were you, I would quickly add me to your plonk file and not bother yourself with the need to protect others. I have observed quite a few seriously dysfunctional amateur astronomers, they usually aren't the type that casually fit in with the masses. As Carl Jung would have explained, they honed their technical abilities at the expense of their personality. This he refers to as differentiation. He depicts this as a cross like structure, with thinking and feeling at opposite ends of one axis, and sensation and intuition at opposite ends of the other axis. He feels, as I do, that when you are differentiated into thinking, you progressively exclude feeling. These amateur astronomers are emasculated, quite awkward at dealing with women, quite oblivious to the needs of others, save for others involved in similar endeavors. Though they ostensibly appear male (some are female, nothing to write home about), they respond towards attractive women visiting the observatory as if they (the astronomers) are about 12 years old. I read your post to my wife, she broke out laughing. The idea that you feel that amateur astronomers aren't dysfunctional was too much for her to handle. She has likewise seen the dysfunction in these people. We used to belong to the AAAP, Amateur Astronomers Association of Pittsburgh, http://trfn.clpgh.org/aaap/ "With over 500 members, it is one of the larger astronomy clubs in the nation.." http://trfn.clpgh.org/aaap/images/brashear.jpg You take umbrage because I mentioned amateur astronomers as dysfunctional, but in your zeal to find fault, you made an improper assumption, i.e. that I find the dysfunction only with them. Quite the contrary, model railroaders, HAM radio operators, remote control model enthusiasts, computer geeks, these all have decent populations that are dysfunctional, as do other more technical hobbies that do not currently come to mind. You also missed that my point of "the kettle calling the pot black". I mentioned this since I also believe that I fall into the dysfunctional category. So what? "Use the plonk file Luke", let the NG fend for themselves. Sincerely, a former dysfunctional amateur astronomer and a somewhat less (not very much less though) dysfunctional shortwave listener. Dr. Artaud Dear "Dr. Artaud:" You limit your defamation to Amateur Astronomers. I have known many astronomers, both radio and optical astronomers, and I observed virtually none who could possibly be classified as "quite dysfunctional personality wise." Those few may simply have been shy. This anonymous bit of defamation should be disregarded. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Dr. Artaud" wrote in message snip To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative. You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is immovable, lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the fist of the all or nothing." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stinger" wrote in
: Thank you for your response. As I recently had the misfortune to need to reload my newsreader program, I have been unsure about those that I previously killfiled (plonked). You would seem to fit admirably into that category. I had read several of your posts and had vacillated on whether or not to killfile you. I think I'll err on the conservative side (apropos) and do it anyway. Take your Rilalin. Ritalin is a drug commonly used for ADHD and narcolepsy. The ADHD indication is often used for adolescents (I guess many would place me in that category by my writings), and for adults with narcolepsy. Being that I am no longer clinically adolescent and that I do not suffer from narcolepsy, I'm afraid that there are no indications for me concerning this product. I would like to thank you for expressing your concern about my health, this certainly puts you above many others on this NG. Dr. Artaud Doc. Take your Ritalin. -- Stinger To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative. You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is immovable, lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the fist of the all or nothing." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doc,
My comment was not meant to offend you. I enjoy reading your posts, and I feel very badly that you took mine that way. Please understand that my pals and I say that phrase when somebody is making an intense effort to belabor the obvious (as a humorous way to let them know they've made their point). I guess I thought it was more universal ;^) Please accept my sincerest apologies, and do know that I actually do care about your health. -- Stinger "Dr. Artaud" wrote in message ... "Stinger" wrote in : Thank you for your response. As I recently had the misfortune to need to reload my newsreader program, I have been unsure about those that I previously killfiled (plonked). You would seem to fit admirably into that category. I had read several of your posts and had vacillated on whether or not to killfile you. I think I'll err on the conservative side (apropos) and do it anyway. Take your Rilalin. Ritalin is a drug commonly used for ADHD and narcolepsy. The ADHD indication is often used for adolescents (I guess many would place me in that category by my writings), and for adults with narcolepsy. Being that I am no longer clinically adolescent and that I do not suffer from narcolepsy, I'm afraid that there are no indications for me concerning this product. I would like to thank you for expressing your concern about my health, this certainly puts you above many others on this NG. Dr. Artaud Doc. Take your Ritalin. -- Stinger To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative. You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is immovable, lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the fist of the all or nothing." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Space Weather - disaster | Dx | |||
Space Weather - disaster | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | Dx |