RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   In DIRE need of shortwave assistance (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/39219-dire-need-shortwave-assistance.html)

Mark November 22nd 03 08:00 AM

In DIRE need of shortwave assistance
 
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at

Mark

Diverd4777 November 22nd 03 11:45 AM

Mark:

Check here for reviews of SW Radios;

http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/rx_current.html

- Off the top of my head:

Grundig Satellite 800,
Sony 7600GR
Sangeans ATS 909A


AND You'll need a good external antenna

( 30 foot random wire will actually do pretty well; youu can build it yourself
)

Look here :

http://www.hard-core-dx.com/nordicdx...ire/index.html

this is good too..!

http://www.angelfire.com/mb/amandx/index.html

Hope this helps

Dan


In article ,
(Mark) writes:


Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at


Mark







Diverd4777 November 22nd 03 12:26 PM

Mark:

- Missed the part about $ 150;

ALSO Consider the Sangean 505A and Yacht Boy 400; they're fairly popular

look he

http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/portable.html

- I bought my Icom R-75 from these guys; ( Universal) pulls in the BBC from
Ascension Island just fine ( Ionosphere willing) using 100 foot random wire.

- ANd got my Sangean 606A from these guys..

http://www.ccrane.com/shortwave_antennas.asp

( very very small set, goes everywhere, ( no SSB ))

Again, and external antenna will make SOOO much difference it's really more
important than
Exactly what set you buy..

& All of them have Small speakers,
so hooking a set of good computer speakers
up to your small portable gives you much much better sound.

Dan


In article ,
(Mark) writes:


Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at


Mark






Joe Strain November 22nd 03 01:07 PM

You cant go wrong with the $100 Grundig S350 which accepts an external
antenna and ground...Pretty civilized receiver with a rf gain control that
has never been needed to be cranked more'en half way up here in O'do

Check radiointel.com for reviews on a new Degen radio similar to the ATS 909
for about $100

yodar


"Mark" wrote in message
om...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at

Mark



Myrton Smith November 22nd 03 01:36 PM

Mark wrote:

Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no


Hello Mark, and group.

I am a long time shortwave/mediumwave listener and have had many
receivers over the years.

I would suggest a portable receiver, such as the now discontinued model
from Radio Shack, DX-398.

Last I knew it was selling for around U.S. $125.00

I have two of these babies, one for the house and one for the car.

It operates on four AA batteries and has some nice features without
going overboard with bells & whistles.

Do your homework Mark, and look around on the Internet at various
receivers and comments about same. Also, I would suggest that you look
around in your area for Ham Radio Flea markets. They usually take place
on weekends.

Good luck and happy listening.


Caribbean Listener November 22nd 03 02:08 PM

Try the Sangean 606A or if that's too tiny, the Grundig 400, If you
can increase your budget, the Sony 7600GR for less than $200 is your
best bet. Just about all these radios will pick up the BBC beaming to
the Caribbean on 5975 kHz from your location in MN. Good luck.

Robert Sillett November 22nd 03 06:06 PM

I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.

The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob



"Mark" wrote in message
om...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at

Mark




Diverd4777 November 22nd 03 07:26 PM

Bob:
Well put.

5975 Via Antigua MAY be the strongest signal from the Beeb;
However, You can get similar news / broadcasts from:

Radio canada International : ( Mornings 13677, 9515), 17820 )
AND
Usually Radio Australia ( Another British - Type place)
right on the other side of the world, but puts out a good signal on 9.580
in the early mornings. Surprisingly strong signal

BBC from Ascension Island can be picked up during the afternoon on 12095
( broadcast from Ascension Island, off the West Coast Of Africa)

- So, although the OFFICIAL BBC broadcasts to the U.S were sadly cut back in
2001, in a Gross lapse of Judgement,
- You CAN still get The BBC ( Or generic Knock Offs) during the day, afternoon
and evening,
All Via inexpensive, reliable Shortwave Radio .

Dan ( listening to BBC from Ascension Island on 12.095 ) 19:25 UTC..



In article , "Robert Sillett"
writes:


I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.

The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob




Sel November 22nd 03 10:36 PM

Mark wrote:
Hey Gang,


The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference.


I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK.


Hi Mark,

If you are looking to hear normal broadcast stations from the UK in the
USA on a shortwave receiver, you are out of luck. If you want to hear
shortwave broadcasts from the BBC, there has been a lot of good options
already mentioned by the other posters.

Sel ........ :)

Icom R-75 E
Icom PCR-1000
Sangean 909
Sangean 404
Uniden UBC9000XLT
Uniden UBC120XLT

http://sel.enternet.co.nz/weathersat.html


craigm November 22nd 03 11:19 PM


"Robert Sillett" wrote in message
...
I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.


The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband

Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob



"Mark" wrote in message
om...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at

Mark




I guess you would have to define 'marginal'. I regularly listen to the BBC
on 5975 in SE Minnesota. It is rare that it can't be heard in the evening.
Other frequencies can be heard also. While I have several radios, the best
antenna I have is 30 feet of wire, all indoors. To imply the the internet is
the only way to listen is just wrong. Even a DX-398 with the whip antenna
works.

craigm



Diverd4777 November 23rd 03 12:05 AM

The Internet is always slow, sometimes full of rain barrell echoes. Sound just
stops on it, meaning a delay of up to 30 seconds before it restarts.
It's too " Belleding Edge" technology,
grat in the Demonstrations in the Board Room, but fair to poor in the field.
AND imagine if you get " away" from the Internet Server farms;

Shortwave is still the way to go

Dan


In article , "craigm"
writes:


"Robert Sillett" wrote in message
...
I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.


The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband

Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob



"Mark" wrote in message
om...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at

Mark




I guess you would have to define 'marginal'. I regularly listen to the BBC
on 5975 in SE Minnesota. It is rare that it can't be heard in the evening.
Other frequencies can be heard also. While I have several radios, the best
antenna I have is 30 feet of wire, all indoors. To imply the the internet is
the only way to listen is just wrong. Even a DX-398 with the whip antenna
works.

craigm






Beloved Leader November 23rd 03 01:24 AM

Myrton Smith wrote in message news:ODJvb.4423$dO2.3062@lakeread03...

I would suggest a portable receiver, such as the now discontinued model
from Radio Shack, DX-398.

Last I knew it was selling for around U.S. $125.00



I bought mine a year ago for US $99.97. They were scarce then.

grumpus November 23rd 03 05:51 AM

(Mark) wrote in message . com...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at


Mark


Mark, I strongly suggest the Sony 7600GR for your purposes. Of all
the radios for $150 or less, I think this model would give you the
best shot of hauling in the BBC. It is more sensitive off the whip
than either the Sangean 909 or the Grundig Yachtboy 400PE. Plus, its
synchronous detector really can help in making an otherwise
unintelligible signal intelligible. As another respondent stated, the
Beeb comes in adequately quite often on 5975 kHz at night. I have
also had reasonable success listening to the Beeb on 12095 kHZ in the
afternoon here in Western NY.

Regards,

Grumpus

Stinger November 23rd 03 01:12 PM

Grumpus,

I have been a little shy to post this, basically because it's tough to
prove, I'm SURE people's "mileage may vary," and people tend to get
emotional about their choices in radios.

A guy recently posted in the DX398/ATS-909 group at Yahoo that he was at a
ham get-together, and his supposedly unmodified ATS-909 outperformed a Sony
7600GR "off the whip." He said everyone there was very impressed with it.

I ordered both a 909 and a 7600 a few weeks ago, and my ATS-909 was very
close in whip performance to the 7600GR, but I wouldn't say "better." Not
needing two portables -- I chose to send the 7600 back. The 909 came from
C. Crane, and is their deluxe model with the anti-chuffing mod already
installed. I do not know (but I doubt if) they did any other modifications.

I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has gotten one of these radios in
the past two months, and what their experience is. Though I hope Sangean
saw fit to boost performance of American-market radios, frankly, it wouldn't
surprise me if Sony toned their whip performance down, as I've seen posts
that it actually does have problems with overloading in Europe.

-- Stinger


"grumpus" wrote in message
om...
(Mark) wrote in message

. com...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at


Mark


Mark, I strongly suggest the Sony 7600GR for your purposes. Of all
the radios for $150 or less, I think this model would give you the
best shot of hauling in the BBC. It is more sensitive off the whip
than either the Sangean 909 or the Grundig Yachtboy 400PE. Plus, its
synchronous detector really can help in making an otherwise
unintelligible signal intelligible. As another respondent stated, the
Beeb comes in adequately quite often on 5975 kHz at night. I have
also had reasonable success listening to the Beeb on 12095 kHZ in the
afternoon here in Western NY.

Regards,

Grumpus




RFCOMMSYS November 23rd 03 06:06 PM

said ---



I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations.


Get the Sony ICF-SW7600GR. Its synchronous detector is a VERY important feature
to have for decent shortwave reception.

http://universal-radio.com/catalog/portable/0360.html

As others have said, any appreciable length of wire clamped to a radio's whip
antenna will usually improve reception of weak signals.

Also, if you're only interested in hearing BBC news, some U.S. AM/FM stations
actually broadcast the BBC news a few times a day. These are typically college
or NPR-type stations, or all news stations. Maybe do a Google search or call
your local stations?

grumpus November 23rd 03 08:15 PM

"Stinger" wrote in message . ..
Grumpus,

I have been a little shy to post this, basically because it's tough to
prove, I'm SURE people's "mileage may vary," and people tend to get
emotional about their choices in radios.

A guy recently posted in the DX398/ATS-909 group at Yahoo that he was at a
ham get-together, and his supposedly unmodified ATS-909 outperformed a Sony
7600GR "off the whip." He said everyone there was very impressed with it.

I ordered both a 909 and a 7600 a few weeks ago, and my ATS-909 was very
close in whip performance to the 7600GR, but I wouldn't say "better." Not
needing two portables -- I chose to send the 7600 back. The 909 came from
C. Crane, and is their deluxe model with the anti-chuffing mod already
installed. I do not know (but I doubt if) they did any other modifications.

I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has gotten one of these radios in
the past two months, and what their experience is. Though I hope Sangean
saw fit to boost performance of American-market radios, frankly, it wouldn't
surprise me if Sony toned their whip performance down, as I've seen posts
that it actually does have problems with overloading in Europe.

-- Stinger


Stinger, I suppose you've got me. I was quite impressed with the
performance and features of the 7600GR but I sent back the one I had
because I hated using those pointy little buttons on the side and I
wanted to move up to a 2010. Nonetheless, I thought it demonstrated
excellent sensitivity when I used it off the whip alone. It was even
better used in conjunction with Sony's AN-LP1 loop antenna (within
moments of using this combo I heard Voice of the Mediterranean and a
Northern African broadcaster). Subsequently, I purchased a DX-398
(Sangean 909) on closeout for $99 at RS. It seems adequate off the
whip, but nothing more. When I use it for SW, I hook it up to a
reel-out antenna I have strung out across the ceiling and it performs
quite well then (with this set-up I QSL'd CKZN, a 1kW CBC station
1,000 miles away). My understanding is that the 909/398 is the best
among all the portables in its price range in its ability to handle a
serious external antenna without overloading. Is this an indication
of reduced sensitivity off the whip? I don't know. I have not done
any kind of head-to-head comparison of the 7600GR and the 909/398, so
the impression I have formed about the relative sensitivity of these
two models off their whips alone comes from just a little bit of
practical experience and the net wisdom of this group and what I read
in Passport. So, in truth, it is an interesting question whether my
perceptions were colored by an existing bias in favor of the 7600GR,
or I correctly judged the relative performance of the two radios.

Regards,

Grumpus



"grumpus" wrote in message
om...
(Mark) wrote in message

. com...
Hey Gang,

I am in need of some help in picking out a new shortwave radio. I no
nothing about them, but I am looking for something for $150 or less.
The SOLE PURPOSE that I need this radio for is to pull in as clearly
as possible any and all radio stations from the UK. Specifically the
BBC stations. I live in Minneapolis, MN if that makes any
difference. I am not at all concerned with am, fm or stations from
any other part of the world, ONLY the UK. My wife wants to get me one
for Christmas, so quick replies would be appreciated. Thanks in
advance for any help you can provide. Please e-mail all responses to
me at


Mark


Mark, I strongly suggest the Sony 7600GR for your purposes. Of all
the radios for $150 or less, I think this model would give you the
best shot of hauling in the BBC. It is more sensitive off the whip
than either the Sangean 909 or the Grundig Yachtboy 400PE. Plus, its
synchronous detector really can help in making an otherwise
unintelligible signal intelligible. As another respondent stated, the
Beeb comes in adequately quite often on 5975 kHz at night. I have
also had reasonable success listening to the Beeb on 12095 kHZ in the
afternoon here in Western NY.

Regards,

Grumpus


Tony Meloche November 23rd 03 08:49 PM



grumpus wrote:

"Stinger" wrote in message . ..
Grumpus,

I have been a little shy to post this, basically because it's tough to
prove, I'm SURE people's "mileage may vary," and people tend to get
emotional about their choices in radios.

A guy recently posted in the DX398/ATS-909 group at Yahoo that he was at a
ham get-together, and his supposedly unmodified ATS-909 outperformed a Sony
7600GR "off the whip." He said everyone there was very impressed with it.

I ordered both a 909 and a 7600 a few weeks ago, and my ATS-909 was very
close in whip performance to the 7600GR, but I wouldn't say "better." Not
needing two portables -- I chose to send the 7600 back. The 909 came from
C. Crane, and is their deluxe model with the anti-chuffing mod already
installed. I do not know (but I doubt if) they did any other modifications.

I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has gotten one of these radios in
the past two months, and what their experience is. Though I hope Sangean
saw fit to boost performance of American-market radios, frankly, it wouldn't
surprise me if Sony toned their whip performance down, as I've seen posts
that it actually does have problems with overloading in Europe.

-- Stinger


Stinger, I suppose you've got me. I was quite impressed with the
performance and features of the 7600GR but I sent back the one I had
because I hated using those pointy little buttons on the side and I
wanted to move up to a 2010. Nonetheless, I thought it demonstrated
excellent sensitivity when I used it off the whip alone. It was even
better used in conjunction with Sony's AN-LP1 loop antenna (within
moments of using this combo I heard Voice of the Mediterranean and a
Northern African broadcaster). Subsequently, I purchased a DX-398
(Sangean 909) on closeout for $99 at RS. It seems adequate off the
whip, but nothing more. When I use it for SW, I hook it up to a
reel-out antenna I have strung out across the ceiling and it performs
quite well then (with this set-up I QSL'd CKZN, a 1kW CBC station
1,000 miles away). My understanding is that the 909/398 is the best
among all the portables in its price range in its ability to handle a
serious external antenna without overloading. Is this an indication
of reduced sensitivity off the whip? I don't know. I have not done
any kind of head-to-head comparison of the 7600GR and the 909/398, so
the impression I have formed about the relative sensitivity of these
two models off their whips alone comes from just a little bit of
practical experience and the net wisdom of this group and what I read
in Passport. So, in truth, it is an interesting question whether my
perceptions were colored by an existing bias in favor of the 7600GR,
or I correctly judged the relative performance of the two radios.

Regards,

Grumpus





At the bototm line, the radio that just *seems* right to you in all
the ways you like best *is* the right one for you.

Tony


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Stephen M.H. Lawrence November 23rd 03 11:20 PM



"RFCOMMSYS" wrote:

| Also, if you're only interested in hearing BBC news, some U.S. AM/FM
stations
| actually broadcast the BBC news a few times a day. These are typically
college
| or NPR-type stations, or all news stations. Maybe do a Google search or
call
| your local stations?

Yup, 91.1 in the MPLS/St Paul area broadcasts BBC from midnight 'til 6 a.m.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.542 / Virus Database: 336 - Release Date: 11/18/03



RHF November 24th 03 09:15 AM

RS,

To carry your "Logic" forward and based upon the 'emperical evidence'
(his posting here) that Mark already has a Computer and an Internet
Connection. We can conclude that Mark is currently 'paying' that
Bill. So by simply going to the BBC Website: Mark can Listen to the
BBC for FREE !

wmcis ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "Robert Sillett"
= = = wrote in message ...
I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.

The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob


Joe Ringer November 26th 03 05:27 PM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:06:58 -0500, Robert Sillett wrote:
I don't think any of the previous postings properly addressed Mark's
question.

Since the BBC stopped shortwave broadcasts to the USA in 2001, it's very
hard to receive them. And since Mark is looking at a budget portable, the
only broadcast that he could possibly listen to would be the evening
broadcast on 5975 kHz. Yes, there are other broadcasts that can be
received; however, none of the others are better than marginal.

The only way to properly hear the BBC in the USA is via a broadband Internet
connection.

On the other hand, Mark's posting makes a very good point. A decent
shortwave portable can cost only $100 to $200. But if Mark decides to
listen to the BBC via the official line, that is via broadband Internet,
then he's conservatively looking at $40 per month or $480 per year.

Bob


Here in Baltimore, MD 5975 comes in great, late nite 6135 is good and 15190
in the mornings is also pretty good. The BBC can also be found on 88.1, a
local fm station 12am - 5am local time.

--
clear skies,
Joe
GS800M ~ S/N: S8304027607
YB400PE ~ S/N: 615254
http://users.erols.com/jringer3/astro1.htm


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com