Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
let me tell you a thing or two... the satellit 800 don't need no
stinking PBT or DSP. the sync detector is BETTER than all those options It depends, as always, on what the listener requires for the types of listening they do most often. If you tend to listen only to SW programming or MW stations, and casually at that, then perhaps you may not need anything more than a good synch. function, decent tone controls, good headphones and a quiet antenna. For most SWLs, however, a good, working synch detector (which the 800 does boast, and rightfully so) is simply not good enough for other fading, noise and distortion problems, and since it is an entirely different function than passband tuning or even the much-debated DSP function, it is silly to claim that any synch detector is 'better' than those features. It's like claiming a preselector is better than a 3-band EQ... apples and oranges. I've never been a fan of DSP, at least not the more common AF DSP (rather than true IF types) so that's neither here nor there for me. I like the 800, but for my listening tastes, if I don't have a good PBT or IF shift, or a more robust selection of bandwidths, I won't use the radio. It's great, but it ain't no 'king' of radios. You have the right to love it to death and sleep with it each night, of course. And God bless you... but to each their own, right? Linus |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SECRET ICOM SALE: R-75 $425 W/ DSP AND FREE SHIPPING | General | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 (Reduced) | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 (Reduced) | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 | Equipment |