Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
starman wrote in message How are you designing the PC board(s) for this receiver? Do you use some CAD software? I do use a CAD program. For the prototyping, I print out the artwork on an Inkjet transparency, and use boards that have a photosensitized resist. Our jobber wants 250 dollars for each prototype run, so it is cheaper for me to do it myself. Once I get everything designed, we will go to our board house, and have some real boards made up. It is quite a bit of work, spotfacing all of the holes on the ground plane, and soldering feedthrough wires, to connect the top ground plane to the copper flood on the bottom side of the board, but it is the only way to get a board with a nice low impedance RF ground. Another interesting thing.................it is a good idea not to lay down your ground vias on a fixed grid; instead, drop them around the board in a pseudo-random fashion. This way, you can minimize the chances of having resonances in the structure. I remember one project that I was working on a few years back. The designer decided to lay down all of the ground vias on a 50 mil grid. This was a 900MHz hybrid synthesizer, that used a mixing scheme to translate the tuning range. Anyway, the board had a very sharp resonant peak right in the middle of the image band. The engineer that I was working with didn't believe that this was the case, until we started drilling out the vias with a Dremel tool. A good way to check a PC board for undesired resonances is to take the unpopulated board, and connect an SMA launch at each end of the board (input and output). Connect a network analyzer, and you should see a flat noise spectrum, if the board was properly designed. Another trick of the trade for checking VCOs is to connect a network analyzer to the inpur of the VCO. Set up the analyzer for a Smith Chart type of display. You will know if you have your feedback capacitors optimized for the tuning range of interest, if you are centered in the maximum magnitude region of negative resistance. This was a pretty common technique at Rockwell. When I mentioned this to the folks that I was working with in my department at Motorola, they had never heard of this method. Pete That's really interesting. I've studied how Drake designed the PC boards for their R8 series of receivers. I'm going experiment with the grounding system to see how it affects the synthesizer noise which shows up at certain frequencies, mostly in the higher HF range. It's much less on the 'B' model than earlier versions but I think there's still room for improvement. Thanks for the reply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Homebrew | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Homebrew |