"CW" wrote in
:

"Those who beat their weapons into plows will plow for those who do
not." I suspect the same will, for some people, be said of "those that
traded their Ham Radios for cell phones will be relying on those that
didn't" Can you say local disaster with extended power loss to the
towers?

For as much of the country that seems to be covered for cell use, and for
the areas that most people travel, there are indeed remote areas or areas
not adequately covered. I'll hedge my bet by having both a HAM radio and
cell phone.

Same with the shortwave broadcasters giving up the ghost in favor of the
internet and doing internet "radio". I do much of my listening with
portable radios, I can't see being encumbered with a piece of magnificent
technology that needs to be tied to something else in order for me to
hear the show i.e. a phone line or cordless network.

Too much high technology, too little assured reliability.

We have two 3000 HP electric motors at work that are controlled by
variable frequency drives. Nice, when they work. Finicky otherwise. The
same motor did the same job for years without the VFD, no problems. More
technology, more problems.

Regards.



It would depend on where you are at. If you are in hilly country and
you are not right on the top of a tall hill, don't count on a portable
CB to have more than 1 to 2 miles range, if that.

--
Never say never.
Nothing is absolute.

It would be ideal if he would haul a trailer everywhere he went with
generators , portable antennas and a 10,000 watt all band transmitting
station. He also needs to pack his portable bomb shelter and years worth of
food and water. Never know when World War 3 is going to break out. Also
needs to practice up on his Morse code so that, on the plane ride to his
hiking destination, if a meteorite hits the plane, causing it to crash on a
remote desert island and the emergency beacons are out, he can build a CW
transmitter from the wreckage so he can give his exact location to any
rescuers. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the course in navigation he needs to
take so he will know what his location is and the electronics course he
needs to take so he will be able to build that transmitter. This assumes, of
course, that he has already taken the survival and fisrt aid course.
"Soliloquy" wrote in message
4...
"CW" wrote in
:

"Those who beat their weapons into plows will plow for those who do
not." I suspect the same will, for some people, be said of "those that
traded their Ham Radios for cell phones will be relying on those that
didn't" Can you say local disaster with extended power loss to the
towers?

For as much of the country that seems to be covered for cell use, and for
the areas that most people travel, there are indeed remote areas or areas
not adequately covered. I'll hedge my bet by having both a HAM radio and
cell phone.

Same with the shortwave broadcasters giving up the ghost in favor of the
internet and doing internet "radio". I do much of my listening with
portable radios, I can't see being encumbered with a piece of magnificent
technology that needs to be tied to something else in order for me to
hear the show i.e. a phone line or cordless network.

Too much high technology, too little assured reliability.

We have two 3000 HP electric motors at work that are controlled by
variable frequency drives. Nice, when they work. Finicky otherwise. The
same motor did the same job for years without the VFD, no problems. More
technology, more problems.

Regards.



It would depend on where you are at. If you are in hilly country and
you are not right on the top of a tall hill, don't count on a portable
CB to have more than 1 to 2 miles range, if that.

--
Never say never.
Nothing is absolute.