|
Hoagland finds old Chevy Vega car parts on Mars !!
Frank Dresser wrote:
snipped Hoagland doesn't know the half of it. The entire planet is made out of Chevy Vegas, which explains why Mars consists of little but rust. I thought they were Datsun-1200's. I never saw a car disintegrate like that one. The front shock towers would collapse until the tires were rubbing on the inside of the wheel wells. If you tried to weld what was left of the sheet metal, it would vaporize in a puff of smoke. All of this was because the Japanese experimented with recycled steel by laminating (compressing) it into new sheet metal. The problem was they didn't get the trapped air and water out of the layers with the compressing process. The cars literally rusted from the inside out. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
"starman" wrote in message ... I thought they were Datsun-1200's. I never saw a car disintegrate like that one. The front shock towers would collapse until the tires were rubbing on the inside of the wheel wells. If you tried to weld what was left of the sheet metal, it would vaporize in a puff of smoke. All of this was because the Japanese experimented with recycled steel by laminating (compressing) it into new sheet metal. The problem was they didn't get the trapped air and water out of the layers with the compressing process. The cars literally rusted from the inside out. This radical Datsun 1200 theory conflicts with the now well established theory of Vega Martiian origins. Let's conider the familiar Martian monument to the greatest egotistical phoney in the universe. While it has been long assumed the face at Cydonia is an image of Richard C. Hoagland, my studies have revealed it is actually a monument to the father of the Vega, John Z. Delorean. This fact can be confirmed by anyone who can make out the inscription on the base of the monument -- "There is no ice on the Martian snowcaps". Frank Dresser |
Leonard Martin wrote:
Seriously for a moment. When I heard the first 15 minutes of this nonsense I was mystified and troubled: I heard Hoagy explaining the technical aspects of the space shuttle destruction earlier this year, and he was great. He really seemed to know what he was talking about and he explained it clearly. How can so intelligent a person make a career of pedalling nonsense? I can see stupid people doing it, but I think intelligent people tend to have a natural respect for the truth. Anyone have any opinions on this human conundrum? Leonard In article , mail wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:16:43 GMT, "Irony Alert" wrote: It could be worse, he could think that lighting farts is what causes El Nino. Don't give him any ideas. -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Shake it like a polaroid picture." - Andre 3000 of Outkast Hoagland is not a scientist, he does not do science. Hoagland is a performance artist. He does what he does as part of an act that pays him enough so as to avoid real work. To the best of my knowledge Hoagland has never held a job in the traditional sense of the word, I seriously doubt he is employable at all. |
\\ The Commentator // wrote:
Hoagland is not a scientist, he does not do science. Hoagland is a performance artist. He does what he does as part of an act that pays him enough so as to avoid real work. To the best of my knowledge Hoagland has never held a job in the traditional sense of the word, I seriously doubt he is employable at all. He was a science advisor to Walter Cronkite in the 60's and apparently the curator of a science museum. I wonder what kind of nonsense he fed Cronkite in those days? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
"starman" wrote in message ... He was a science advisor to Walter Cronkite in the 60's and apparently the curator of a science museum. I wonder what kind of nonsense he fed Cronkite in those days? Considering Hoagland's credibility, I wonder if he even met Walter Cronkite. Frank Dresser |
"Glenn W. Cooper" wrote:
You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away and over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. GC. Name one. |
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
"\The Commentator//" wrote in message ... "Glenn W. Cooper" wrote: You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away and over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. GC. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. -- The Usenet Irony Alert Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003 Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant. |
Irony Alert wrote:
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." "\The Commentator//" wrote in message ... "Glenn W. Cooper" wrote: You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away and over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. GC. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. There is that, good point. |
"Irony Alert" wrote in message news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54... "The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if he had said that no one takes him seriously. |
Gazmik wrote:
"Irony Alert" wrote in message news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54... "The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if he had said that no one takes him seriously. Not exactly true. There are enough hoagbots out there who manage to swallow his stories and pay him enough so that he does not have to work. |
In article , \\The Commentator//
wrote: Gazmik wrote: "Irony Alert" wrote in message news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54... "The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if he had said that no one takes him seriously. Not exactly true. There are enough hoagbots out there who manage to swallow his stories and pay him enough so that he does not have to work. This is quite true, last night I heard a couple of them calling hoax-to-hoax to bow and scrape before the Hoaxie throne, even when hoaxmeister wasn't on (assuming these weren't just more faked calls by the producers to make Snorey sound relevant). -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully and Gummint Disinformation Agent |
"Carl R. Osterwald" wrote:
In article , \\The Commentator// wrote: Gazmik wrote: "Irony Alert" wrote in message news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54... "The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if he had said that no one takes him seriously. Not exactly true. There are enough hoagbots out there who manage to swallow his stories and pay him enough so that he does not have to work. This is quite true, last night I heard a couple of them calling hoax-to-hoax to bow and scrape before the Hoaxie throne, even when hoaxmeister wasn't on (assuming these weren't just more faked calls by the producers to make Snorey sound relevant). -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully and Gummint Disinformation Agent I missed that, thankfully. Hoaxie manages to sound like a scientist, while actually knowing next to nothing about science or engineering. This the only people who swallow his act know even less. I strongly suspect the calls were instigated by Hoaxie. After all, Snorrey is his free ad budget. He could not afford to buy that much air time, it would mangle the profit picture something terrible. |
Leonard Martin wrote:
In article , \\The Commentator// wrote: "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote: In article , \\The Commentator// wrote: Gazmik wrote: "Irony Alert" wrote in message news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54... "The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted." over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of occasions. Name one. Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him seriously. But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if he had said that no one takes him seriously. Not exactly true. There are enough hoagbots out there who manage to swallow his stories and pay him enough so that he does not have to work. This is quite true, last night I heard a couple of them calling hoax-to-hoax to bow and scrape before the Hoaxie throne, even when hoaxmeister wasn't on (assuming these weren't just more faked calls by the producers to make Snorey sound relevant). -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully and Gummint Disinformation Agent I missed that, thankfully. Hoaxie manages to sound like a scientist, while actually knowing next to nothing about science or engineering. This the only people who swallow his act know even less. I strongly suspect the calls were instigated by Hoaxie. After all, Snorrey is his free ad budget. He could not afford to buy that much air time, it would mangle the profit picture something terrible. Snorrey----how aptly named! Art Bell is a nutcase collector but has a great personality. And sometimes he even questions the outre assertions of his guests! Snorrey is bland as a dry pancake and is also like one in that he invariably lies down and lets the nutcases walk right over him. "Gee, no kidding! You must be right", or the equivalent is his eternal refrain. He can't even handle open-line calls from the great unwashed, by far the most interesting stuff on Coast to Coast, well. Sadly, shortly after I got my Versacorder, Art left. And what else is there to listen to on US AM, after all? I don't enjoy hearing right-wing host work themselves into near-frenzies over the monstrosities committed by liberals. What ever happened to the fairness rule, anyway? How sad: to love listening to radio and to live in the US! Leonard I kisten to BBC. Of course they are about as leftist as NPR, but where else would you get such earthshaking news like "Chad beats Sri Lanka in cricket." Snorrey is just an idiot, so he panders to idiots. That is all he knows how to do. Bell pandered to idiots too, remember the Hale-Bopp mess? The difference betwen Bell and Snorrey is simple: Bell managed to be modestly entertaining in small doses. Snorrey is not entertaining at all. |
The "Fairness Doctrine" was unfair so the eliminated it.
"Leonard Martin" wrote in message news:lmarti49- What ever happened to the fairness rule, anyway? |
I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who
this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? |
In article , Dat's
Me wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. They have these things out now called "search engines." You might want to try one sometime. Hoaxie has been around for a long time, pushing his "theories". His web****e: http://www.enterprisemission.com/. Don't miss these high spots: http://www.enterprisemission.com/pasadena2.html http://www.enterprisemission.com/isis.htm http://www.enterprisemission.com/lib7.htm Or is it just me!? You are asking me? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Hoaxland is very glib, and sounds like he is an authority and a scientist. In truth, he is neither, but non-technical people can be easily fooled by his schtick. Or, could it be, you people are bored? Stealth Hoagbot? -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully and Gummint Disinformation Agent |
Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim
to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. "Dat's Me" wrote in message t.au... I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:08:41 +1000, Dat's Me
wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? What, a North American with too much time on his/her hands? Surely you jest! -- Rev. St. Klyf "Not Max Cannon" Sēģ-M257 the Not-Quite-Sane Remove 'TURNIP' from address when replying. Looks like *somebody* left Mister Prozac at home. |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:14:30 -0800, "CW"
wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. I stopped listening to the show a long time ago, dufus. -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Shake it like a polaroid picture." - Andre 3000 of Outkast |
Dat's Me wrote:
I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? So you do not know who or what we are talking about, yet you feel compelled to offer your opinion. Typical ******. |
CW wrote:
Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator//
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- V.G. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:06:53 -0700, Carl R. Osterwald wrote:
I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. They have these things out now called "search engines." You might want to try one sometime. I wasn't trying to find out more about him and from the little I've seen as quotes from him - I see no point in trying. The above was merely an observation. Or is it just me!? You are asking me? My question there (in more detail): Or is it just me who doesn't seem to know much/anything about him? I asked because I saw sone poster refer to being in Britain (I think) but, then again, he could have been an US expat. If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Hoaxland is very glib, and sounds like he is an authority and a scientist. In truth, he is neither, but non-technical people can be easily fooled by his schtick. Since it appears that he believes that there are car engine parts on Mars and according to what I've read on a.astronomy, he's not doing that as a comedy routine, it seems to me that anyone with half a brain would obviously see through him. Then I remember that there seems to be several people with less than half a brain who regularly frequent the news group and so, I withdraw the question. Or, could it be, you people are bored? Stealth Hoagbot? Not this week. |
"Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- Dunno, never heard Jim Rome. Sorry. |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:40:36 -0800, wrote:
Dat's Me wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? So you do not know who or what we are talking about, yet you feel compelled to offer your opinion. In the post above I offered no opinion. I asked questions. Typical ******. Considering that that is a normal human function and not related to astronomy or this discussion, its a pointless observation. |
Dat's Me wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:40:36 -0800, wrote: Dat's Me wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? So you do not know who or what we are talking about, yet you feel compelled to offer your opinion. In the post above I offered no opinion. I asked questions. Typical ******. Considering that that is a normal human function and not related to astronomy or this discussion, its a pointless observation. As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. |
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:39:00 -0800, \\The Commentator//
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- Dunno, never heard Jim Rome. Sorry. Sports talk radio, one very, very small step up from infomercials. -- V.G. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:18:36 -0800, wrote:
As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. As compared to you people wasting bandwidth with persistent and repetitious insults about him etc. Oh, I die of shame! |
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:59:43 +1000, Dat's Me
wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:18:36 -0800, wrote: As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. As compared to you people wasting bandwidth with persistent and repetitious insults about him etc. *gasp* We must preserve that precious bandwidth. Think of the Children! Oh, I die of shame! Okay, die already. No need to drag it out. This ain't opera, y'know. -- Rev. St. Klyf "Not Max Cannon" Sēģ-M257 the Not-Quite-Sane Remove 'TURNIP' from address when replying. "I'm the keeper of the cheese. And you're the lemon merchant. Get it?" --Ren Hoek |
In article , \\The Commentator//
wrote: Dat's Me wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:40:36 -0800, wrote: Dat's Me wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? So you do not know who or what we are talking about, yet you feel compelled to offer your opinion. In the post above I offered no opinion. I asked questions. Typical ******. Considering that that is a normal human function and not related to astronomy or this discussion, its a pointless observation. As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. Wasted bandwith..LOL. That is soooooo last century. pb |
"\The Commentator//" wrote in message
... "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:39:00 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- Dunno, never heard Jim Rome. Sorry. Sports talk radio, one very, very small step up from infomercials. -- Wait a second! I have heard him, and you are right, TERRIBLE radio. Seen his TV show? You think he *sounds* stuck on himself... Jim |
Dat's Me wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:18:36 -0800, wrote: As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. As compared to you people wasting bandwidth with persistent and repetitious insults about him etc. Oh, I die of shame! Rest in peace. |
"Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:39:00 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- Dunno, never heard Jim Rome. Sorry. Sports talk radio, one very, very small step up from infomercials. -- Wait a second! I have heard him, and you are right, TERRIBLE radio. |
Clave wrote:
"\The Commentator//" wrote in message ... "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:39:00 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:23 -0800, \\The Commentator// wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: CW wrote: Their bored. They claim to hate Art bell. So they listen to him. They claim to hate George Norry. So they listen to him. I just had a great idea. I will put on the worst radio show imaginable. That way everyone will hate it so they will have to listen. I'll get rich. With a plan like this, I will exceed Bell's ratings in no time. Give it a try, see how far you get. Worse than Jim Rome? shudder! -- Dunno, never heard Jim Rome. Sorry. Sports talk radio, one very, very small step up from infomercials. -- Wait a second! I have heard him, and you are right, TERRIBLE radio. Seen his TV show? You think he *sounds* stuck on himself... Jim His radio show was so bad I completely blocked it from my memory, I can't imagine having to look at him too. |
"polar bear" wrote in message ... In article , \\The Commentator// wrote: Dat's Me wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:40:36 -0800, wrote: Dat's Me wrote: I must be blessed by not being an Northern American. I have no idea who this Hoagland person that you people insult so vigorously is. Or is it just me!? If (at it seems) he is such a waste of time, why refer to him at all, surely it would be better to simply ignore any references to him altogether? Or, could it be, you people are bored? So you do not know who or what we are talking about, yet you feel compelled to offer your opinion. In the post above I offered no opinion. I asked questions. Typical ******. Considering that that is a normal human function and not related to astronomy or this discussion, its a pointless observation. As you said, you claim not to know anything about the person, yet you waste bandwidth with pointless questions/opinions. Wasted bandwith..LOL. That is soooooo last century. pb I think that died with the Enron "bandwidth market" scheme. What a scam! -- Stinger |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com