Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

But he is indeed a good programming choice! The stations that carry Rush are
reaping a windfall! Can you deny that Rush makes money for a station that
carrys
his program?

The programming guru's that put Rush on their stations are being lauded!

But, I can bet that you'll have an arguement and 1000's of URL's to dispute
that
Rush is a good programming choice!

But as I said, that's the world of debate and academia! Come to think of it,
there
a lot of tin-foil hats in academia, and I'm sure a good number of them
dislike
Rush. Jealousy! Isn't there a saying along the lines of those who can do,
those who
can't teach?


First, let me applaud your 2nd rate effort at pulling this conversation away
from an area where you weren't doing that well! ;-)

That's just your opinion. In my opinion you are doing quite poorly yourself!



Oh yeah, Steve! Every college instructor I know of gets together with the other
commies at 4pm and plots how to cope with Rush Limbaugh's true greatness. Yep,
definitely our biggest concern...

OK, OK, so they get together at 8 AM, what's the difference?



Yes, Rush's AM daytime dominance definitely proves his acumen and brilliance
the same way Art Bell's nighttime dominance proved his speculations were right.
Remember, "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" is doing well in the ratings. Does
that prove anything about the show's extremism? Of course not.

I've heard of the show. You spend a lot of time watching it? ;-)



Maybe you could use a few of Rush's oxycontin tablets to calm down and be able
to return to the global warming discussion.

Waddya think?

I don't do drugs... you?

I've been calm all day. It's you we're worried about! If I were you, (and thank the
Great Spirit I am not), I'd be looking for more productive ways of spending my
birthday! And, MLK's holiday to boot! LMAO



Mike