| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#61
January 19th 04, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Read the URLs, CW. The scientific evidence is pretty conclusive. In the light of your refusal to post any URLs containing counter-evidence it seems that the baseless emotional outburst is just one more of your "emissions" that can be traced back to you. The only thing conclusive is that you believe em! Nothing less, nothing more! No, you're wrong. The other conclusive thing is that no matter how much scientific evidence and consensus exists (or will ever exist), we can count on your "common sense" to trump it. Come on, Steve! You can do better than the weak one-line responses you've limited yourself to this morning. Weak? A matter of opinion I suppose! One line? Perhaps, but that's all it really takes to oppose the wearers of tin-foil hats. And actually, I don't think Rush uses the tin-foil hat remark to much. He likes 'Extremist Environmental Whackos' much more I believe. Smile, it's MLK Day! Bryant, not sending a copy to your mailbox, OK, Steve? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
#62
January 19th 04, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#63
January 19th 04, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Gore is indeed a political extremist. That's sweet coming from a guy who just posted in another thread that Rush Limbaugh is a good programming choice. But he is indeed a good programming choice! The stations that carry Rush are reaping a windfall! Can you deny that Rush makes money for a station that carrys his program? The programming guru's that put Rush on their stations are being lauded! But, I can bet that you'll have an arguement and 1000's of URL's to dispute that Rush is a good programming choice! But as I said, that's the world of debate and academia! Come to think of it, there a lot of tin-foil hats in academia, and I'm sure a good number of them dislike Rush. Jealousy! Isn't there a saying along the lines of those who can do, those who can't teach? To be honest, I'm not a big Gore fan. But his environmental book was mainstream in the science community. I can point to hundred of science books supporting every thing he wrote. Bryant |
|
#64
January 19th 04, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Having a bad day, Steve? No, but apparently you are! Even though it's your Birthday and MLK day to boot! I rarely have a bad day. If it sucks to be you, so be it! When it sucks to be me, then I'll worry! Well, I'm pretty happy to be me. Happy enough to enjoy showing folks that even Master Centurion DXers don't really grasp non-radio issues that well. LOL... methinks you have a highly inflted opinion of yourself! You're making gross assumtions again, much like you are making about global warming! I have a good grasp of many, many non-radio related issues. I just don't have a grasp on tin-foil hat thinking! I'll leave that to you, a non-Master DX Centurian. I earned mine! so I flaunt it! Ten posts from you and none of them saying anything of substance or offering a bit of counter-support. Thank goodness that most conservative commentators put a little more energy into their efforts. ;-) Yes, they do. You finally noticed that I'm not a conservative commentator, that's progress on your part! Bryant |
|
#65
January 19th 04, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: N8KDV
But he is indeed a good programming choice! The stations that carry Rush are reaping a windfall! Can you deny that Rush makes money for a station that carrys his program? The programming guru's that put Rush on their stations are being lauded! But, I can bet that you'll have an arguement and 1000's of URL's to dispute that Rush is a good programming choice! But as I said, that's the world of debate and academia! Come to think of it, there a lot of tin-foil hats in academia, and I'm sure a good number of them dislike Rush. Jealousy! Isn't there a saying along the lines of those who can do, those who can't teach? First, let me applaud your 2nd rate effort at pulling this conversation away from an area where you weren't doing that well! ;-) Oh yeah, Steve! Every college instructor I know of gets together with the other commies at 4pm and plots how to cope with Rush Limbaugh's true greatness. Yep, definitely our biggest concern... Yes, Rush's AM daytime dominance definitely proves his acumen and brilliance the same way Art Bell's nighttime dominance proved his speculations were right. Remember, "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" is doing well in the ratings. Does that prove anything about the show's extremism? Of course not. Maybe you could use a few of Rush's oxycontin tablets to calm down and be able to return to the global warming discussion. Waddya think? Mike |
|
#66
January 19th 04, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV But he is indeed a good programming choice! The stations that carry Rush are reaping a windfall! Can you deny that Rush makes money for a station that carrys his program? The programming guru's that put Rush on their stations are being lauded! But, I can bet that you'll have an arguement and 1000's of URL's to dispute that Rush is a good programming choice! But as I said, that's the world of debate and academia! Come to think of it, there a lot of tin-foil hats in academia, and I'm sure a good number of them dislike Rush. Jealousy! Isn't there a saying along the lines of those who can do, those who can't teach? First, let me applaud your 2nd rate effort at pulling this conversation away from an area where you weren't doing that well! ;-) That's just your opinion. In my opinion you are doing quite poorly yourself! Oh yeah, Steve! Every college instructor I know of gets together with the other commies at 4pm and plots how to cope with Rush Limbaugh's true greatness. Yep, definitely our biggest concern... OK, OK, so they get together at 8 AM, what's the difference? Yes, Rush's AM daytime dominance definitely proves his acumen and brilliance the same way Art Bell's nighttime dominance proved his speculations were right. Remember, "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" is doing well in the ratings. Does that prove anything about the show's extremism? Of course not. I've heard of the show. You spend a lot of time watching it? ;-) Maybe you could use a few of Rush's oxycontin tablets to calm down and be able to return to the global warming discussion. Waddya think? I don't do drugs... you? I've been calm all day. It's you we're worried about! If I were you, (and thank the Great Spirit I am not), I'd be looking for more productive ways of spending my birthday! And, MLK's holiday to boot! LMAO Mike |
|
#67
January 19th 04, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#68
January 19th 04, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Yes, they do. You finally noticed that I'm not a conservative commentator, that's progress on your part! Thank you. This goes into a word file. I promise you will see your words again!LOL... methinks you have a highly inflted opinion of yourself! You're making gross assumtions again, much like you are making about global warming! I have a good grasp of many, many non-radio related issues. I just don't have a grasp on tin-foil hat thinking! I'll leave that to you, a non-Master DX Centurian. I supported my arguments. You chose to make assertions without even an attempt at corroboration. Without really an attempt at counter-argument! So what? The correct spelling is "inflated," not inflted. No ****, Sherlock! Yup, I know how to spell too! I got's me a colluge degree too! Just as assumtions is actually spelled "assumptions." Thank goodness that Master Centurion DXers are so critical our society that they are not expected to spell. Keep feeding us that DX, Steve. Everyone needs an intrinsic purpose to justify spending 18 hours a day in front of their receiver. ;-) There ya go, making assumptions again! You accuse others of doing it, but you are indeed the Master! Mike |
|
#69
January 19th 04, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Yes, they do. You finally noticed that I'm not a conservative commentator, that's progress on your part! Thank you. This goes into a word file. I promise you will see your words again!LOL... methinks you have a highly inflted opinion of yourself! You're making gross assumtions again, much like you are making about global warming! I have a good grasp of many, many non-radio related issues. I just don't have a grasp on tin-foil hat thinking! I'll leave that to you, a non-Master DX Centurian. I supported my arguments. You chose to make assertions without even an attempt at corroboration. Without really an attempt at counter-argument! The correct spelling is "inflated," not inflted. Just as assumtions is actually spelled "assumptions." Thank goodness that Master Centurion DXers are so critical our society that they are not expected to spell. Keep feeding us that DX, Steve. Sorry you can't find the DX on your own! Pitiful, just pitiful. ;-) Everyone needs an intrinsic purpose to justify spending 18 hours a day in front of their receiver. ;-) Mike |
|
#70
January 19th 04, 06:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
