|
Thin Ice !!
|
Soames123 wrote: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its life. The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even around for a lot of them. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
huxters, who fleece them whilst they are
consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. Ok; what's your source for Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. |
"Soames123" wrote in message ... huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. Ok; what's your source for Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. They have been taking ice core samples for years in Antartica and up north and in those sample are time line evidence that go back thousands of years showing these warming trends. Its common knowledge in the scientific and educated community. I think Japan has extensive research in this field going on right now. Don't you ever watch the Discovery channel or TLC. Sheesh! -- 73 and good DXing RX: R-5000, SP-600 JX-6, SX-28 Ant: 100' longwire, Evesdropper Dipole Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
Say Cuss,
Just because they took your "tin Hat" away you don't have to look/say pointed things at the rest of us!!! Cousin Burr N8KDV wrote: Soames123 wrote: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its life. The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even around for a lot of them. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
I can remember the (in)famous Newsweek cover
which read, in bold print, something along the lines of: "THE COMING ICE AGE." The nutcases can't make up their minds, but are trying to regulate our lives, based upon junk science. 73, S.L. "N8KDV" wrote in message ... | | | Soames123 wrote: | | http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html | | That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the | earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its | life. | | The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even | around for a lot of them. | | It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys | into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. | | They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are | consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. | | But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! | | Steve | Holland, MI | Drake R7, R8 and R8B | "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © | | http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm | --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04 |
"Soames123" wrote: | Ok; | what's your source for | Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. October 22, 2002 U.S. Facts vs. U.N. 'Science' by Patrick J. Michaels Patrick J. Michaels is senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute and author of "The Satanic Gases." This is getting repetitious. Once again, the United States stands alone against a United Nations determined to impose its view of disastrous climate change. And, once again, the U.N. threatens economic annihilation if we don't go along. They call America's action "Unilateralism." But let's call it by its real name: "common sense." This time it concerns the insurance industry. On Oct. 7-not coincidentally just a few days after the American hurricane season reaches its peak-the U.N.'s Climate Change Working Group released a report called "Climate Change and the Financial Services Industry." The predictable bottom line: Climate Change has the potential to destroy the insurance industry, so, America, please get in line with our view of climate change. This kind of stuff comes from the top. U.N. General Secretary Kofi Annan keeps criticizing our reluctance to adopt the scientifically discredited Kyoto Protocol. In a recent op-ed in the Washington Post that was his number one demand. But the U.N.'s new report goes Annan one further. While finally admitting that Kyoto won't do much about the planet's climate, the report then demands more and more and more Kyotos, in agreement with scientists in the Clinton administration who estimated that we need about 19 Kyotos to stop warming. One Kyoto costs, conservatively, 2 percent of our GDP per year. Nineteen? Don't go there, unless you're the U.N. Specifically, the new U.N. report projects that, as a result of climate change leading to more frequent and severe storms, along with demographic changes (read: more people able to afford more expensive beach houses) worldwide insurance losses will total an additional $150 billion in the next decade. They trot out an impressive graph showing dramatic increases in damage costs in recent years. What isn't apparent, except to anyone reading the fine print, is that this figure lists damages from all "natural causes," and that most of the recent increase is from two big earthquakes (1994 and 1995). While our greener friends like to blame many oddities on global warming, no one is crazy enough to say that it causes earthquakes. Big European reinsurers (the people who insure the insurance companies), like Swiss Re and Munich Re, have been singing the climate change dirge for years. It forms a convincing argument for raising their rates, and their pro-Kyoto (read: anti U.S.) governments are only too happy to nod in agreement. By far, the biggest producer of weather-related damage is the hurricane, and the largest exposure, in terms of insured property value, is the United States east coast, where the insured value is roughly the same as our annual gross domestic product. Further, damage costs appear to be going up. So, if the U.N. is right, the number or severity of hurricanes should be increasing dramatically. It's not. There's no trend at all in the number of these storms striking the United States. In fact, the 1990s appear to be especially hurricane-poor. It's also well known to hurricane scientists that the average maximum recorded winds have been declining for the last half-century. The new U.N. document is so brazen that it contravenes another U.N. body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In its latest compendium on the subject, called the "Third Assessment Report," which it likes to call the "consensus of scientists" (it's really the "consensus of scientists picked by the U.N."), says: "There is little sign of long-term changes in tropical storm intensity and frequency," and "[r]ecent analyses of changes in severe local weather (tornadoes, thunder days, lightning and hail) in a few selected regions provide no compelling evidence for widespread systematic long-term changes." As for the future, the U.N. climate report says that its climate models show no systematic changes in these storms. While Munich Re, Swiss Re, and the U.N. Climate Change Working Group shill for a mutually interested, if falsified, climate apocalypse, who isn't surprised that Americans have a different idea? Let's guess that there really is a free market here, and that U.S. insurers can choose between Munich Re, with rates artificially kited by fears of worsening climate, and some American reinsurer, whose rates are predicated on constant climate with increasing property values. Munich Re would advertise its product as more reliable, with assurance that it can survive our increasingly harsh climate. The Americans will be much less expensive. Given the facts, which would you choose? Let's predict that global warming hype isn't going to put American reinsurers out of business, but that it could be very harmful to the economic well-being of their European competitors. Hurray for American "Unilateralism." Care to rebut that, you putz? 73, S.L. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04 |
Take the Pierry - Riese (sp?) map of Antarctica as an example.
73, S.L. "Brian Hill" brianehill@charterDOTnet wrote in message ... | | "Soames123" wrote in message | ... | huxters, who fleece them whilst they are | consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. | | Ok; | what's your source for | Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. | | They have been taking ice core samples for years in Antartica and up north | and in those sample are time line evidence that go back thousands of years | showing these warming trends. Its common knowledge in the scientific and | educated community. I think Japan has extensive research in this field going | on right now. Don't you ever watch the Discovery channel or TLC. Sheesh! | | -- | 73 and good DXing | RX: | R-5000, SP-600 JX-6, SX-28 | Ant: | 100' longwire, Evesdropper Dipole | | Brian's Radio Universe | http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ | | | --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04 |
In article . net, "Stephen
M.H. Lawrence" writes: The nutcases can't make up their minds, but are trying to regulate our lives, based upon junk science. Junk Science is all over; it sells magazines, so don't believe everything yu read in Newsweek the only truth is in " Myth Busters.." and careful observation... - |
N8KDV wrote:
The historical and geological records bear this out. Steve: Was that pun intended? hehe -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming.
There is some global warming, but it is NOT man-caused. See The Hockey Stick: http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/hockey/hockey.htm Bill, K5BY |
Brian Denley wrote: N8KDV wrote: The historical and geological records bear this out. Steve: Was that pun intended? hehe No, but it did work out nicely though. :-) -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
Bill [K5BY],
Thank You - Now I know the Difference between 'Scientific Facts' and "SCIENTISM" when it comes to the Issue of Global Warming. "The `Hockey Stick': A New Low in Climate Science" - by John L. Daly GoTo= http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/hockey/hockey.htm NOTE: Have placed this on my RMR = Rapid Message Recall (RMR) List. I now have the: "What About the 'Medieval Warm Period' and the 'Little Ice Age'"; as counter points to the 'Evironmental Wackos' claims about Global Warming. Plus being able to tell an 'Evironmental Wacko' making claims about Global Warming:. "Have You been out in the Sun Too Long? Do You have Sun Spots Imprinted on your Brain? Do You Know anything about the 'Maunder Minimum' and diappearence of Sun Spots for 70 Years? Well Do You? Do You !" But the Great Fun will be being able to say to them and repeating these two words: "hockey sticks, Hockey Sticks. HOCKEY STICKS !" while waving my arms about in the air and bulging my eyes out :o) jftfoi ~ RHF .. .. = = = (WShoots1) = = = wrote in message ... Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. There is some global warming, but it is NOT man-caused. See The Hockey Stick: http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/hockey/hockey.htm Bill, K5BY .. |
RHF wrote: Bill [K5BY], Thank You - Now I know the Difference between 'Scientific Facts' and "SCIENTISM" when it comes to the Issue of Global Warming. "The `Hockey Stick': A New Low in Climate Science" - by John L. Daly GoTo= http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/hockey/hockey.htm An excellent article! NOTE: Have placed this on my RMR = Rapid Message Recall (RMR) List. I now have the: "What About the 'Medieval Warm Period' and the 'Little Ice Age'"; as counter points to the 'Evironmental Wackos' claims about Global Warming. Plus being able to tell an 'Evironmental Wacko' making claims about Global Warming:. "Have You been out in the Sun Too Long? Do You have Sun Spots Imprinted on your Brain? Do You Know anything about the 'Maunder Minimum' and diappearence of Sun Spots for 70 Years? Well Do You? Do You !" But the Great Fun will be being able to say to them and repeating these two words: "hockey sticks, Hockey Sticks. HOCKEY STICKS !" while waving my arms about in the air and bulging my eyes out :o) jftfoi ~ RHF . . = = = (WShoots1) = = = wrote in message ... Not a trace of Info supporting Global Warming. There is some global warming, but it is NOT man-caused. See The Hockey Stick: http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/hockey/hockey.htm Bill, K5BY . |
BURR,
Lets not insult N8KDV by implying that he wears of sometimes wears a 'Tin Hat' or the less effective 'Aluminum Foil Beanie'. N8KDV, is a Learned Radio Enthusiast and has Advanced Electro- Mechanical Knowledge beyond the common ordinary natural being. To Be factual, N8KDV uses an 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' to: Tune-In-the-Truth (What Ever It May Be) - - - A-n-D - - - Tune-Out-the-Absurd (I Don't Know What You Call It... But I Know It - When I Hear It !) So Say I ~ RHF The Inventor of the 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' .. .. = = = Burr = = = wrote in message link.net... Say Cuss, Just because they took your "tin Hat" away you don't have to look/say pointed things at the rest of us!!! Cousin Burr N8KDV wrote: Soames123 wrote: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its life. The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even around for a lot of them. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
RHF wrote: BURR, Lets not insult N8KDV by implying that he wears of sometimes wears a 'Tin Hat' or the less effective 'Aluminum Foil Beanie'. N8KDV, is a Learned Radio Enthusiast and has Advanced Electro- Mechanical Knowledge beyond the common ordinary natural being. To Be factual, N8KDV uses an 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' to: Tune-In-the-Truth (What Ever It May Be) - - - A-n-D - - - Tune-Out-the-Absurd (I Don't Know What You Call It... But I Know It - When I Hear It !) So Say I ~ RHF The Inventor of the 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
N8KDV wrote: RHF wrote: BURR, Lets not insult N8KDV by implying that he wears of sometimes wears a 'Tin Hat' or the less effective 'Aluminum Foil Beanie'. N8KDV, is a Learned Radio Enthusiast and has Advanced Electro- Mechanical Knowledge beyond the common ordinary natural being. To Be factual, N8KDV uses an 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' to: Tune-In-the-Truth (What Ever It May Be) - - - A-n-D - - - Tune-Out-the-Absurd (I Don't Know What You Call It... But I Know It - When I Hear It !) So Say I ~ RHF The Inventor of the 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' There was supposed to be a Huh!? inserted into that last post... oh well! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
"N8KDV" wrote in message
... Soames123 wrote: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its life. The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even around for a lot of them. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm It amazes me that so many apparently quite intelligent people can completely embrace the idea of greenhouse gas emissions having no effect at all on the global climate. Variations occur naturally over time; that has never been in dispute. However, the physical properties of CO2 are very well known, and we're adding a lot to the atmosphere every year. It would be nice if some natural process is cancelling out the effects of all that extra CO2. I hope it is, for our sake, but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. Anyway, does anyone know if higher average temperatures will have any effect on shortwave propagation? Or other frequencies, like Sporadic 'E' in the summer? |
Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Soames123 wrote: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/...re2/index.html That's all quite interesting, but as most any educated person knows, the earth has had warm spells and cold spells off and on throughout its life. The historical and geological records bear this out. And man wasn't even around for a lot of them. It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. They are easy prey for the huxters, who fleece them whilst they are consumed by their ignorance of simple concepts. But hey! Don't lose any sleep over it! It amazes me that so many apparently quite intelligent people can completely embrace the idea of greenhouse gas emissions having no effect at all on the global climate. Well, from this we can ascertain that the wearing of a tin-foil hat in no way cuts down on an individuals ability to experience amazement. Variations occur naturally over time; that has never been in dispute. However, the physical properties of CO2 are very well known, and we're adding a lot to the atmosphere every year. It would be nice if some natural process is cancelling out the effects of all that extra CO2. I hope it is, for our sake, but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. Questions: Do you have just one tin-foil hat or several? Are any painted in pretty colours, or do you prefer the natural look? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. Hmmm. Which is colder ... the city or the woods? Are the cities expanding, or shrinking? Think about it. jw wb9uai |
In article , "Ian Smith"
writes: It amazes me that so many apparently quite intelligent people can completely embrace the idea of greenhouse gas emissions having no effect at all on the global climate. Not at all ! You can take a hypotheses, then run right out and find evidence to prove your beilefe; - Look at the " OJ Jury " - Didn't want to believe he was guilty, so they found the evidence that went along with their belief. & then called everyone else " Prejudiced ". Nobel winning scientists are repeatedly bamboozled by Hucksters, Frauds, sleight of hand artists; Happens all de time ! Variations occur naturally over time; that has never been in dispute. However, the physical properties of CO2 are very well known, and we're adding a lot to the atmosphere every year. An interesting Idea: - Ocean's general warming trend is killing off Coral, which usually absorbs & Builds calcium Carbonate exoskeletons; - But with the corals dying out, from their environment warming slightly, the C02 the coral would have absorbed is still in solution in ocean water, absorbing heat from the sun ( etc) slightly expanding the volume of the Ocean, hence Slightly raising sea levels.. ( ! ! ! ) It would be nice if some natural process is cancelling out the effects of all that extra CO2. I hope it is, for our sake, but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. Anyway, does anyone know if higher average temperatures will have any effect on shortwave propagation? Or other frequencies, like Sporadic 'E' in the summer? Now; if the overall atmosphere Does warm by a slight amount, it will expand in volume ( right ?? ) - So we might surmise that the upper parts of the atmosphere would be displaced Upwards.. accelerating the decay of low earth orbit satellites; and possibly raising the absolute elevation of the Ionospheres reflective layers.. not a " 1 + 1+1 = 3 " or Correlation = Causality but - an interesting Idea... Dan |
|
IS,
It is my understanding that by the year 2020 the actual majority of the so called Global Warming "Green House Gases" will be generated by three countries: China, India and Indonesia. NOT from the Automobiles or Power Plants in the USofA but simply from the common people of those countries burning carbon fuels to heat their homes and cook their food. People Gota Live... Or would you suggest that we start with THOSE PEOPLE ! * Shall They Freeze ? * Shall They Starve ? * Shall They Simply Be Eliminated ? All in the 'name' of "Protecting the Planet" from People ! Got My 'Inverted "CK" Antenna' On ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Ian Smith" = = = wrote in message ... It amazes me that so many apparently quite intelligent people can completely embrace the idea of greenhouse gas emissions having no effect at all on the global climate. Variations occur naturally over time; that has never been in dispute. However, the physical properties of CO2 are very well known, and we're adding a lot to the atmosphere every year. It would be nice if some natural process is cancelling out the effects of all that extra CO2. I hope it is, for our sake, but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. Anyway, does anyone know if higher average temperatures will have any effect on shortwave propagation? Or other frequencies, like Sporadic 'E' in the summer? .. .. |
"N8KDV" wrote in message
... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message snipped Questions: Do you have just one tin-foil hat or several? Are any painted in pretty colours, or do you prefer the natural look? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B In fact, scientific knowledge forms the basis of our modern civilisation. All that technology we conveniently use in our everyday lives (including your shortwave radio gear) is the result of scientific research. You can't dismiss one complete branch of science without dismissing it all (and going to live in a cave), because that would make you a hypocrite. Strange questions about tin-foil hats are unacceptable as a means of persuading other people to change their minds about the causes of global warming. This does your case no good at all. I would have thought that to be self-evident. Good DX my friend. Ian, Renfrew, Scotland. |
Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message snipped Questions: Do you have just one tin-foil hat or several? Are any painted in pretty colours, or do you prefer the natural look? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B In fact, scientific knowledge forms the basis of our modern civilisation. All that technology we conveniently use in our everyday lives (including your shortwave radio gear) is the result of scientific research. You can't dismiss one complete branch of science without dismissing it all (and going to live in a cave), because that would make you a hypocrite. Strange questions about tin-foil hats are unacceptable as a means of persuading other people to change their minds about the causes of global warming. This does your case no good at all. I would have thought that to be self-evident. Good DX my friend. Ian, Renfrew, Scotland. Tin-foil hats or not, what you fail to see is that my case is sound, while yours is flawed... get over it. :-) |
|
|
In article , "Brenda Ann"
writes: Subject: (OT) Thin Ice !! From: "Brenda Ann" Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:31:42 +0900 "Diverd4777" wrote in message ... In article , (J999w) writes: It is only the uneducated public (tin foil hat crowd) that really buys into Global Warming as a truly manmade occurrence. Hmmm. Which is colder ... the city or the woods? Are the cities expanding, or shrinking? Think about it. jw wb9uai Hmm... Well I've seen on TV woods catch fire & burn down & this process generates lots of heat. : So maybe we should take a tip from our forward thinking freinds in Brazil, Indonesia and Africa And just burn down all the forests. ! We could then Put in tract housing, with beautiful Blue Swimming pools Swimming Pools don't burn. : - So that would take care of the problem of the woods burning down & generating heat ! : This being true, Cities generate less heat than the woods : There would be more cities than woods So the earth would cool down Go into an Ice age & freezing all the Swimming Pools... .. Which wouldn't matter a whit, since we would have long since run out of oxygen to breath, and would be dead.. leaving only the cockroaches left to enjoy the swimming pools anyway.. :) - But Brenda, If you Heat all the swimming pools, then they would release the gases trapped in solution ! part of these gases is Oxygen, - so By heating the swimming Pools We'd all have air to breath! : ( & THEN we could go after the cockeroaches ! ! ! ) |
"N8KDV" wrote in message
... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message snipped Questions: Do you have just one tin-foil hat or several? Are any painted in pretty colours, or do you prefer the natural look? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B In fact, scientific knowledge forms the basis of our modern civilisation. All that technology we conveniently use in our everyday lives (including your shortwave radio gear) is the result of scientific research. You can't dismiss one complete branch of science without dismissing it all (and going to live in a cave), because that would make you a hypocrite. Strange questions about tin-foil hats are unacceptable as a means of persuading other people to change their minds about the causes of global warming. This does your case no good at all. I would have thought that to be self-evident. Good DX my friend. Ian, Renfrew, Scotland. Tin-foil hats or not, what you fail to see is that my case is sound, while yours is flawed... get over it. :-) Denying the well-known physical properties of CO2 as a greenhouse gas hardly soundifies your case. But I see no reason to hold any grudges, and will continue to read your other posts with interest. regards, Ian |
Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Ian Smith wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message snipped Questions: Do you have just one tin-foil hat or several? Are any painted in pretty colours, or do you prefer the natural look? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B In fact, scientific knowledge forms the basis of our modern civilisation. All that technology we conveniently use in our everyday lives (including your shortwave radio gear) is the result of scientific research. You can't dismiss one complete branch of science without dismissing it all (and going to live in a cave), because that would make you a hypocrite. Strange questions about tin-foil hats are unacceptable as a means of persuading other people to change their minds about the causes of global warming. This does your case no good at all. I would have thought that to be self-evident. Good DX my friend. Ian, Renfrew, Scotland. Tin-foil hats or not, what you fail to see is that my case is sound, while yours is flawed... get over it. :-) Denying the well-known physical properties of CO2 as a greenhouse gas hardly soundifies your case. But I see no reason to hold any grudges, and will continue to read your other posts with interest. regards, Ian Thanks Ian, and I yours. Steve Holland, MI USA |
= = = (Diverd4777)
= = = wrote in message ... In article , (RHF) writes: IS, It is my understanding that by the year 2020 the actual majority of the so called Global Warming "Green House Gases" will be generated by three countries: China, India and Indonesia. NOT from the Automobiles or Power Plants in the USofA but simply from the common people of those countries burning carbon fuels to heat their homes and cook their food. People Gota Live... Or would you suggest that we start with THOSE PEOPLE ! * Shall They Freeze ? * Shall They Starve ? * Shall They Simply Be Eliminated ? All in the 'name' of "Protecting the Planet" from People ! - Let them all eat Frozen Food ?? Yeah, we can build Huge Nuclear Powered Frozen food factories Taking care of Unemployment AND global Warming.. ! - But If there is no such thing as Global Warming then we don't have anything to worry about ! :-) Diverd4777, HUGH Nuclear Powered 'anythings' will result in GLOW Warming ! Turn Out The Lights . . . The Party Is Glowing Over Here, There, and Everywhere ~ RHF .. |
Apparently, your definition of closed mind is "he who does not think like
me". In this debate, the only ones that have provided any scientific proof are the ones that don't believe that humans are the cause of the changing weather. The global warming fanatic goes on guesses and emotionalism. Relying on these is more likely to get you into trouble than help anything. "Ian Smith" wrote in message news:zehOb.5468$JL4.42208@newsfep4- but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. |
"CW" wrote in message
... Apparently, your definition of closed mind is "he who does not think like me". In this debate, the only ones that have provided any scientific proof are the ones that don't believe that humans are the cause of the changing weather. The global warming fanatic goes on guesses and emotionalism. Relying on these is more likely to get you into trouble than help anything. "Ian Smith" wrote in message news:zehOb.5468$JL4.42208@newsfep4- but having a closed mind to the issue isn't going to make it go away. Please read my other posts in this thread. Good DX to you. regards, Ian |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com