| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Here's an idiot (Bryant) complaining about someone going off the original topic. LMAO! Oh, and you never drift from SW to harass people, do you, Steve? It's your "bully personality" that started all this crap in the first place. Laugh, you need all the humor in your lonrly life that you can get! 'lonrly'? What's that!? A Kentuckyism I'm not familiar with. I started nothing retard boy... read the posts. When was the last time you posed as Dave Anthony? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
George Orwell wrote: In article ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Anonymous Sender You do smoke something, maybe heroin by your incoherent gibberish. That's why you got fired from that teaching position. Or was it the other thing mentioned? You must be low on your supply is why you're uptight. I've heard that's how you drug addicts get. You are wrong on many counts. Yet you didn't substantiate it with any facts. I am not a drug addict. Denail about your drug addiction, that's the first sign of the CLASSIC symptoms. I was not fired. But *you* admitted you were fired: (Michael Bryant) admitted he has gotten fired from everything he's ever tried in 20040308071351.02894.00001120@mb- m15.aol.com: "I have been fired from anything in my life." Now you're saying you are a liar, as well? Read the URLs that have already been posted. You need to get your facts right. You need to make up better excuses, doper. You admitted being fired: (Michael Bryant) admitted he has gotten fired from everything he's ever tried in 20040308071351.02894.00001120@mb- m15.aol.com: "I have been fired from anything in my life." That you don't know what the HELL you are talking about? Prove me wrong. What has Lloyd done to deserve to be daily called things like "child molestor"? Sounds like my previous remarks hit too close to home, fatboy doper. Here you are defending Lloyd again, but you forgot to call him stupid, you slipped up. Did you get that Psychology "degree" with one of your dime bags or out of a crackerjack box? No, I got it at the largest university in America. And it's in Communication, not Psychology. You *do* know what "contradiction" means, don't you? Lloyd isn't a "child molestor" How do you know? The rest of your post is just the same type of crap that losers like you post every single day. Lies, mistruths and ad hominems. We went to the "Michael W. Bryant" International School of Internet Posting Inspired by Drugs. That way, we too can have Michael W Bryant INSIPID posts, just like you. You and Steve Lare probably served together. No, but at *least* we served, and wasn't a draft-dodging coward who went to Canada to smoke dope like you did. Thanks for your service to our country. We did indeed serve. My only wish is that we served well enough. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
|
= = = Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
= = = wrote in message = = = news:49d53b7ca394b3a67331044f373e488a@cypherpunks .to... In article ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV When was the last time you posed as Dave Anthony? Well, it's been some time since I used Dave's laptop and his account. Didn't I always sign those posts with MWBRYANT? Dave was one of my debaters at Weber State, so I think it's been a couple of years. So, what does that prove, Steve? Well, it proves you were busted for drugs, doper. And, what exactly *were* you doing to that kid in that motel room, besides smoking dope with him...more of that NAMBLA handshake? ActCpTrm, Do you have Proof of the Fact that "MWB" is a Member of NAMBLA ? North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA) NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/ College Boys are a little OLD for NAMBLA. Usually NAMBLA members are looking for Pre-Teen or Teen Age Boys. Do you have any Photos of "MWB" with Teen Age Boys to prove your statement: That MWB is a Pot Smoking Member of NAMBLA ? These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] IF (Big If) these most Serious Charges are True (We Must Investigate Them Completely.) BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "MWB" must prove that In-Fact He is NOT a Member of NAMBLA. PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB ! MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. Answer Up MWB ~ RHF .. .. From the November 29th, 2001 Standard Examiner, Ogden, Utah: Ex-WSU coach pleads guilty. CEDAR CITY--A former Weber State University professor and debate coach was ordered to pay a $550 fine after pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia in 5th Circuit Court Tuesday. Michael Bryant accepted a plea agreement from Iron County prosecutors that dropped the charge of obstructing justice. On Oct. 6, Bryant and another student were found in a motel room with marijuana, Bryant, who was with the team at a tournament, resigned from Weber State shortly after. .. |
MWB,
You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.] North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA) NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/ These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA. PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB ! MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. "MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone' while young Boys are in the building ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone' while young "Boys are playing ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA. My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB" [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen palta ~ RHF .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer And, what exactly *were* you doing to that kid in that motel room, besides smoking dope with him...more of that NAMBLA handshake? Since there were about 15 people in the room, including the 22-year old "kid's" girlfriend, I assure you it wasn't whatever you mean by a "NAMBLA handshake," though I think we can safely assume that your specific knowledge of such activities is extensive. Thanks for the re-print which proved that I was only given a relatively small fine and that I was not fired. The article does not say that me and other person charged were the only ones in the room. That's your insinuation. BTW, what's your political base? It seems like you're down on Lloyd (to get back to the original subject!) because of his ultra right-wing political perspectives. Do you also consider yourself a conservative? Or are the politics of intimidation the only party you support? Why, if you think you're so correct, do you lack the courage to put your real name on your posts? I think the answer is obvious... Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) .. |
MWB,
You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.] North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA) NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/ These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA. PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB ! MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. "MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone' while young Boys are in the building ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone' while young "Boys are playing ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA. My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB" [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen palta ~ RHF .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer And, what exactly *were* you doing to that kid in that motel room, besides smoking dope with him...more of that NAMBLA handshake? Since there were about 15 people in the room, including the 22-year old "kid's" girlfriend, I assure you it wasn't whatever you mean by a "NAMBLA handshake," though I think we can safely assume that your specific knowledge of such activities is extensive. Thanks for the re-print which proved that I was only given a relatively small fine and that I was not fired. The article does not say that me and other person charged were the only ones in the room. That's your insinuation. BTW, what's your political base? It seems like you're down on Lloyd (to get back to the original subject!) because of his ultra right-wing political perspectives. Do you also consider yourself a conservative? Or are the politics of intimidation the only party you support? Why, if you think you're so correct, do you lack the courage to put your real name on your posts? I think the answer is obvious... Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) .. |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: (RHF) SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Sad behavior, RHF. Since you claim to be a Christian, your behavior is behavior that you must know you that you will be held accountable for. I am a married father of a daughter in her twenties. How would you feel if your children saw these types of claims made against you by people claiming to be Christian? I no longer believe your claims of being a Christian, Mr. Fisk. The way you act and the things you say are not the actions or words of a Christian. Prove you are a Christian, Mr. Fisk, because your actions suggest otherwise. And to set the record straight - I am neither a member of NAMBLA or a homosexual. An "indictment" carries the burden of proof. I am a teacher and my past actions have been thoroughly investigated. To have such a respected member of our community act the way you have is particularly reprehensible, Mr. Fisk. The standards for an indictment on internet slander are different than they are for internet harassment. I advise you, Mr. Fisk, to look them up. Why don't you do one of your Google 'Power Searches' for us Bryant and post the 'standards' here. We'll all be holding our breath! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
In article ,
says... MWB, You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.] North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA) NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/ No, no, it's the North American MARLON BRANDO Love Association! Don't you watch South Park? These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] "mer Seriousness"? Is that like a merman or mermaid? BUTT Freudian slip there, dude. - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA. PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB ! "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. By who? Whoop, bad English. "By WHOM?" "MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?" First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone' while young Boys are in the building ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Uh... if he and the boys were in there, he could hardly be called 'alone'... Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone' while young "Boys are playing ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Ditto. Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB "Priest" would be a bigger concern, I think. SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA. You're taking this from Hal Turner's webpage, aren't you? My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB" ^^^^^^^^^ [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] You misspelled 'Satanist" there. Just thought you should know. MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen palta ~ RHF You know, if you're going to be sarcastic these days - OR serious, for that matter - you REALLY need to indicate it, because things have gotten so wacky it's not always easy to tell the difference. FW |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer And, what exactly *were* you doing to that kid in that motel room, besides smoking dope with him...more of that NAMBLA handshake? Since there were about 15 people in the room, including the 22-year old "kid's" girlfriend, I assure you it wasn't whatever you mean by a "NAMBLA handshake," though I think we can safely assume that your specific knowledge of such activities is extensive. Thanks for the re-print which proved that I was only given a relatively small fine and that I was not fired. The article does not say that me and other person charged were the only ones in the room. That's your insinuation. But that's not what the article says does it? "On Oct. 6, Bryant and another student were found in a motel room with marijuana, Bryant, who was with the team at a tournament, resigned from Weber State shortly after". So suddenly all those other individuals whom you 'claim' were in the room were somehow not there with marijuana but you and Hallmeyer were? And then you two were charged, but no one else was? The article(s) specifically state that yourself and another individual were found in the room. There is never any mention of any other individuals being in the room. As far as being fired, well indeed you were not, however it is safe to assume that you felt it best to resign prior to being fired is it not? One also often forgets the fact that you tried to make a 'deal' with the prosecutor in the case, so that also may have had some bearing upon your decision to leave Weber State. After all, your 'friends' might have a bit of a problem hanging around with someone they might consider to be a 'narc'. This is very strange Bryant. Keep spinning! P.S. How am I doing with my sentences today? Better than one line responses? LOL |
MWB,
See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF" But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message with My "NAME" in the Subject Line. You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.] = = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect. When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not: + Commend You + Defend You + Encourage You For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW. THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES" MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the "OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists. (o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] (o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ . (o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ . (o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. (o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs) (o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.] (o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________. TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ? Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media. PLEASE NOTE "MWB": That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs: My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___" [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] ___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of ______ - Amen ir... ~ RHF = = = I Remain... RHF [.] .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: (RHF) SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Sad behavior, RHF. Since you claim to be a Christian, your behavior is behavior that you must know you that you will be held accountable for. I am a married father of a daughter in her twenties. How would you feel if your children saw these types of claims made against you by people claiming to be Christian? I no longer believe your claims of being a Christian, Mr. Fisk. The way you act and the things you say are not the actions or words of a Christian. Prove you are a Christian, Mr. Fisk, because your actions suggest otherwise. And to set the record straight - I am neither a member of NAMBLA or a homosexual. An "indictment" carries the burden of proof. I am a teacher and my past actions have been thoroughly investigated. To have such a respected member of our community act the way you have is particularly reprehensible, Mr. Fisk. The standards for an indictment on internet slander are different than they are for internet harassment. I advise you, Mr. Fisk, to look them up. This is my last response to you, Roy Fisk. The words (and the character behind them) do not warrant any further response. I pray for your darkened soul. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: (RHF) See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF" But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message with My "NAME" in the Subject Line. You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.] = = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect. When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not: + Commend You + Defend You + Encourage You For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW. THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES" MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the "OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists. (o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] (o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ . (o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ . (o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. (o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs) (o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.] (o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________. TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ? Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media. PLEASE NOTE "MWB": That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs: My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___" [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] ___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of ______ - Amen ir... ~ RHF RHF, So, are you drunk? Accusing everyone of being drunk tonight Fat Boy? Are you projecting? Are you in fact drunk yourself? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply whatsoever. Then why did you reply Fat Boy? There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real help. Yes, you do indeed need to get help. You're still projecting! Now you just go roll your fat ass on the floor! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B Vietnam Veterans Against Kerry |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Then why did you reply Fat Boy? OK, Ace Retardo, use your magic decoder ring and translate Roy's gibberish, will you? You didn't answer the question Fat Boy... why did you respond in the first place? Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry |
|
= = = (Frank White) wrote in message
= = = ... In article , says... MWB, You Stand Accused as 'being' a Member of NAMBLA by AvtCpTRm [.] North American Man Boys LOVE Association (NAMBLA) NAMBLA= http://www.nambla.org/ No, no, it's the North American MARLON BRANDO Love Association! Don't you watch South Park? These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] "mer Seriousness"? Is that like a merman or mermaid? FW - Ah Yes - That was a MERE Omission of an 'e'. BUTT Freudian slip there, dude. FW - So you think that Freud liked to wear Slips :o) NO, I say let my 'buts' be BUTs .... and My BUTTs be Boot-i-ful :o) - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "MWB" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a Member of NAMBLA. PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A NAMBLA MEMBER - MWB ! "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" FW - So you See It :o) MWB - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. By who? FW - By All That Call Everyone - To Account :o) Whoop, bad English. "By WHOM?" "MWB" - Are You Currently -or- Have You Ever Been a Member of NAMBLA ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?" FW - yes, Yes. YES ! - You See It :o) First - "MWB" have you ever been in a Public Liberary 'alone' while young Boys are in the building ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Uh... if he and the boys were in there, he could hardly be called 'alone'... FW - Starting to sound like Bill Clinton ? What is the Definition of Alone ? ? What Does "IS" Mean ? Second - "MWB" have you ever been to a Public Park 'alone' while young "Boys are playing ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB Ditto. FW - ditto, Ditto. DITTO ! (Hell - Mega Dittos :o) Third - "MWB" have you ever been an Adult Leader for the Boy Scouts or the Boy's Clubs ? + Answer a simple [ ] YES -or- [ ] No - MWB "Priest" would be a bigger concern, I think. FW - Actually other then family, Public School Teachers are the single group with the Highest Percentage and Highest Number of Child Molesters and Pedophiles. NOT because they as a group are bad; but simply because they have the highest number of interactions between Adults and Teenage Children. SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.] Therefore "MWB" You Stand Convicted as a Member In-Fact of NAMBLA or a De-Facto Member of NAMBLA. You're taking this from Hal Turner's webpage, aren't you? FW - No this is all simple Liberal Logical Rhetoric for 'falsely issuing' a SERIOUS Charge and then Claiming that the "Serious of the Charge" Requires an Investigation. - Regardless of the Truthfulness of the Charges. = Damnation By Inference ;-{ My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "MWB" ^^^^^^^^^ [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] You misspelled 'Satanist" there. Just thought you should know. FW - Obviously your point of reference is different then mine ;-) MWB - Lets Us Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of NAMBLA - Amen palta ~ RHF You know, if you're going to be sarcastic these days - OR serious, for that matter - you REALLY need to indicate it, because things have gotten so wacky it's not always easy to tell the difference. FW FW - Forgive Me - I Never Claimed to be a Communications Major :o) wmcis ~ RHF .. |
MWB,
"RHF, So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply whatsoever. There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real help. Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind...." MWB - Can't See the Humor. MWB - Can't Understand the Logic. MWB - Can't Recognize the Truth. So... Attack and 'attempt' to Ridicule the Messenger. Translation: "MWB" - You Lose - I WIN ! ir... ~ RHF = = = I Remain... RHF :o) .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: (RHF) See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF" But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message with My "NAME" in the Subject Line. You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.] = = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect. When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not: + Commend You + Defend You + Encourage You For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW. THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES" MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the "OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists. (o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.] (o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges "___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ . (o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ . (o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer. (o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs) (o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.] (o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________. TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ? Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media. PLEASE NOTE "MWB": That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs: My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___" [ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ] ___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the Sickness of ______ - Amen ir... ~ RHF RHF, So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply whatsoever. There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real help. Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind.... Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
|
On 12 Mar 2004 11:22:56 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote: From: Tracy Fort Don't you mean "Loser drug addicts for Kerry"? Maybe you could form an "Insecure Heteros for Bush" club. Or "Retards against Kerry." You and Steve could be co-leaders. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) You got the hetero correct anyway. Too bad you can't make the same claim. Tell me, do you share needles with your gay lover? Tracy |
Tracy Fort wrote: On 12 Mar 2004 11:22:56 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Tracy Fort Don't you mean "Loser drug addicts for Kerry"? Maybe you could form an "Insecure Heteros for Bush" club. Or "Retards against Kerry." You and Steve could be co-leaders. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) You got the hetero correct anyway. Too bad you can't make the same claim. Tell me, do you share needles with your gay lover? Tracy LO frickin L! |
|
Michael Bryant wrote:
Snip Kerry Supporters Against Rude, Stupid Veterans, You might want to change the name of that group. In light of the way he's campaigning, at least two out of three of the words in back of "against" seem to apply to your candidate. |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: Tracy Fort You got the hetero correct anyway. Too bad you can't make the same claim. Tell me, do you share needles with your gay lover? I think I got the Insecure hetero correct. The fact that N8KDV would ally with a scum that has mistreated BrendaAnn like you have proves his lack of ethical standards. I'm allied with no one Fat Boy. I'm independent. Your sexual problems (and insecurities) are your to deal with. You know I'm not gay. Making junior-high-school actions, like calling me gay, won't threaten my sexual identity like it would your's insecure hetero-boy. I'm a husband and a father. How about you? Are you another one of those middle-to-old age men that are strangely single while calling married men gay? Really kind of makes you wonder.... Something strange about being single Fat Boy? You are still projecting! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You got the hetero correct anyway. Too bad you can't make the same claim. Tell me, do you share needles with your gay lover? Tracy LO frickin L! Maybe you need to look in the mirror before you laugh... OK Fat Boy. I just went and looked in the mirror (handsome), then I came back here and I laughed at you yet again. |
|
|
On 12 Mar 2004 19:18:58 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote: From: Tracy Fort You got the hetero correct anyway. Too bad you can't make the same claim. Tell me, do you share needles with your gay lover? I think I got the Insecure hetero correct. The fact that N8KDV would ally with a scum that has mistreated BrendaAnn like you have proves his lack of ethical standards. You know I'm not gay. Making junior-high-school actions, like calling me gay, won't threaten my sexual identity like it would your's insecure hetero-boy. I'm a husband and a father. How about you? Are you another one of those middle-to-old age men that are strangely single while calling married men gay? Really kind of makes you wonder.... If that bothers you, ponder how you make other people feel that don't share your sexual orientation. People are people. Learn to live with it, you insecure little boy. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Yep...have a beautiful wife and 3 strapping sons each of which could probably kick your gay little ass..... hahahahahahaha Bryants new saying "Little gay fat boys for Kerry's wide heiny" hahahahahaha |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV OK Fat Boy. I just went and looked in the mirror (handsome), then I came back here and I laughed at you yet again. Then why never married? Problem with women? Unlike you Fat Boy I have no problem at all with women! Retards such as yourself seem to equate not being married to having 'problems' with women. Such is not the case. Once again, you are wrong, wrong, wrong! It boggles the mind! |
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:46:53 -0500, N8KDV
wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV I'm allied with no one Fat Boy. I'm independent. Your sexual problems (and insecurities) are your to deal with. A little drunk, today, Steve? Seems to one of your favourite things to say these days Bryant. The answer is: NO Hey! Speaking of drunk! It's Friday and I don't have to work tonight! I think I'll tie one on just to keep Bryant from telling all lies. He can say I will be drunk and it will be true. Tracy |
Tracy Fort wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:46:53 -0500, N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV I'm allied with no one Fat Boy. I'm independent. Your sexual problems (and insecurities) are your to deal with. A little drunk, today, Steve? Seems to one of your favourite things to say these days Bryant. The answer is: NO Hey! Speaking of drunk! It's Friday and I don't have to work tonight! I think I'll tie one on just to keep Bryant from telling all lies. He can say I will be drunk and it will be true. Tracy TLF, Reminds me of the old Pearl Bailey joke. http://www.wic.org/bio/pbailey.htm Question: Do you believe in he two Party System ? PB's Answer: Why Sure Honey... One on Friday Night and the other on Saturday Night. jftfoi ~ RHF .. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com