| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Tracy Fort wrote: On 26 Mar 2004 18:37:29 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: Tracy Fort Hmmmm...sounds like you don't really have any. Here's the SF Chronicle article an easy google search is probably within your capabilities. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NG475RPQ41.DTL Bush is taking a hit. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Dude...where is the poll? There really is none. Bryant kinda 'made it up' as he went along. Typical! He likes to pull stuff like that, like 'tell us why your wife left you?'... He's told me several times he was gonna sue me, get his lawyer relatives after me, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on and on. It's all part of his 'debate' background. The 'truth' doesn't matter in 'debate'. It comes down to who was more 'persuasive' in their argument. It boggles the mind. |
|
Mark Holden:
Near as I can tell, Bush 41 hasn't run for office in the ten year period I mentioned. Which just shows that your arbitrarily-selected time limit hides the fact that he has been contributing Republican for a lot longer time period. Clarke's statements don't need to be true to pose a threat. I'm sure if he said something scurrilous about you, you'd want to correct the record too. I try to let N8KDV scurrilous comments slide several times a day. ;-) In the long run, I think most people will discount Clarke's book and testimony. I guess we'll see. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He's told me several times he was gonna sue me, get his lawyer relatives after me, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on and on. Says the guy that promised a protective order against me if I emailed him. You got lots of room to point, Steve. Iserv is at this very moment helping me to build a case Fat Boy! You are fun to deal with since you absolutely lack the least ability to discern your own hypocrisy. Can you document that Fat Boy? LOL! |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He's told me several times he was gonna sue me, get his lawyer relatives after me, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on and on. Says the guy that promised a protective order against me if I emailed him. You got lots of room to point, Steve. Spam is illegal Fat Boy, better talk to your lawyer 'relatives' about that! |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: Mark Holden: Near as I can tell, Bush 41 hasn't run for office in the ten year period I mentioned. Which just shows that your arbitrarily-selected time limit hides the fact that he has been contributing Republican for a lot longer time period. Clarke's statements don't need to be true to pose a threat. I'm sure if he said something scurrilous about you, you'd want to correct the record too. I try to let N8KDV scurrilous comments slide several times a day. ;-) Scurrilous? The fact is you have to let 'em slide Fat Boy because you can't back up your ridiculous claims and fabrications! In the long run, I think most people will discount Clarke's book and testimony. I guess we'll see. Sounds like you're backpedaling now Fat Boy? |
N8KDV schrieb: Do you play .... I have a wife to 'play' with... |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV In the long run, I think most people will discount Clarke's book and testimony. Everyone except the wacko liberals! We'll be hearing about it until Jan 2009 when George W. Bush leaves office. In your vision of reality, Steve, is Clarke a wacko liberal? I think he's just a disgruntled employee who was passed up for a post he felt he deserved. The number one rule in business is never demote an employee. The offender should be fired. A demoted employee is a loose cannon. That is perhaps the only fault I would find with Bush regarding this matter. |
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV The number one rule in business is never demote an employee. The offender should be fired. A demoted employee is a loose cannon. That is perhaps the only fault I would find with Bush regarding this matter. I guess we can all thank God that we don't work for you, Steve! You would have been gone long ago Fat Boy. In fact, I doubt that you'd have even been considered for a position! |
|
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV He's told me several times he was gonna sue me, get his lawyer relatives after me, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on and on. Says the guy that promised a protective order against me if I emailed him. You got lots of room to point, Steve. Spam is illegal Fat Boy, better talk to your lawyer 'relatives' about that! No comment Fat Boy? |
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Spam is illegal Fat Boy, better talk to your lawyer 'relatives' about that! No comment Fat Boy? Good luck finding a prosecutor that will consider my non-commercial posts "spam." We're talking about your unsolicited email Fat Boy, and one does not need a prosecutor as has been pointed out to you repeatedly. Are you really this stupid? |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Documentation is only necessary once and you provide it, daily, Steve! But can YOU document it? That was the question Fat Boy. LOL!! What don't you understand, Steve? I gues you can't document it then can you? Like most of your claims and fabrications! I beached the whale, yet again! |
|
Michael Bryant wrote:
Mark Holden: Near as I can tell, Bush 41 hasn't run for office in the ten year period I mentioned. Which just shows that your arbitrarily-selected time limit hides the fact that he has been contributing Republican for a lot longer time period. snip His more recent political contributions are more indicative of his current mindset than his older ones. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Here is a quote from Kerry: "Somebody told me the other day that the Secret Service has orders that if George Bush is shot, they're to shoot Quayle. … There isn't any press here, is there?" (Associated Press, Nov. 16, 1988). Your boy Kerry has some serious problems... Wow. That's the best you can come up with, Steve? Just wait! I'm sure there is more coming from Kerry's mouth! Oh yeah, that's pretty traitorous. Given the fact that Quayle was a laughing stock and an embarassment to the Repiglicans, Kerry picked that joke up on the other side of the Senate floor. You still haven't provided any documentation that Kerry picked that 'joke' up from the other side of the Senate floor. Is that just your opinion, or fact? |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: Yeah, sometimes humor can be easily misinterpreted. Take GW's recent gaffe where he picked up the tablecloth, looked under the table, and asked if the WMDs were hiding under there. That would hardly be considered a 'gaffe'... Talk about serious problems.... Yes, I guess we could begin this morning by talking about your 'serious problems' Fat Boy!. Where would you like to start? |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Another address? Starting to realize how many folks are blocking you, SW info or not? Here is a quote from Kerry: "Somebody told me the other day that the Secret Service has orders that if George Bush is shot, they're to shoot Quayle. … There isn't any press here, is there?" (Associated Press, Nov. 16, 1988). Your boy Kerry has some serious problems... Yeah, sometimes humor can be easily misinterpreted. Take GW's recent gaffe where he picked up the tablecloth, looked under the table, and asked if the WMDs were hiding under there. Only a total idiot such as yourself could 'misinterpret' that humour! But, that's something we've come to expect from you. Now go study that geography book! |
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Another address? Starting to realize how many folks are blocking you, SW info or not? Here is a quote from Kerry: "Somebody told me the other day that the Secret Service has orders that if George Bush is shot, they're to shoot Quayle. … There isn't any press here, is there?" (Associated Press, Nov. 16, 1988). Your boy Kerry has some serious problems... Yeah, sometimes humor can be easily misinterpreted. Take GW's recent gaffe where he picked up the tablecloth, looked under the table, and asked if the WMDs were hiding under there. Only a total idiot such as yourself could 'misinterpret' that humour! But, that's something we've come to expect from you. Now go study that geography book! In fact Bryant, here's a link to a book you could use: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...75030?v=glance |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com