= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ...
"RHF" wrote in message
m...
FW,

"a female interviewer was talking to Ralph Nadar and trying to
get him to admit he'd thrown the election to Bush in 2000,"

ONE MORE DEMOCRAT LIE:

Ralph Nader was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state
between Bush and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan.
[ The Negatives (RN) balanced out the Pluses (PB). ]

However, Pat Buchanan DID 'make' the "Difference Numerically"
in three states.
[ To put them in the Gore (Won) Column and the Bush (Lost) Box. ]

Just the Facts ~ RHF

Sorry RHF--Nader got about 97,000 votes in Florida, Buchanan about
17,000. Gotta be fair.

TE,

I was not talking about Florida

Bush = 2,912,790
Gore = 2,912,253
DELTA = 537
Buchanan = 17,484
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Florida would have went for BUSH - Big Time !
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm


I was talking about these four states where Pat Buchanan
did in-fact cost GW Bush "The WIN" in those States:

* IOWA = Seven (7) Electoral Votes
Gore = 638,517
Bush = 634,373
DELTA = 4,144
Buchanan = 5,731
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
IOWA would have went for BUSH.

* NEW MEXICO = Five (5) Electoral Votes
Gore = 286,783
Bush = 286,417
DELTA = 366
Buchanan = 1,392
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
New Mexico would have went for BUSH.

* OREGON = Seven (7) Electoral Votes
Gore = 720,342
Bush = 713,577
DELTA = 6,765
Buchanan = 7,063
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Oregon would have went for BUSH.

* WISCONSIN = Eleven (11) Electoral Votes
Gore = 1,242,987
Bush = 1,237,279
DELTA = 5,708
Buchanan 11,471
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Oregon would have went for BUSH.


A "Total" of Thirty (30) Electoral Votes for GW Bush )


jtf ~ RHF

..