Pardon, but isn't the measurement of an SWR reading composed of TWO values?
Therefore, the vernacular of "SWR's" would be grammatically correct.

Thank you for that that insightful and most valuable input, I found it most
invaluable good-buddy.




You are talking like a cber, SWR is singular not SWR's(plural)

Macman schrieb:

Pardon, but isn't the measurement of an SWR reading composed of TWO values?
Therefore, the vernacular of "SWR's" would be grammatically correct.


Yes, the reading is of 2 components showing the R(!)atio of them is 1(!)
output. When measuring different SWR's under different circumstances you
have indeed 'SWRs'.