|
Bush Apologizes: Says Sorry
|
WA4009SWL wrote: From Drudge: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html Are you happy now Fat Boy? |
-=jd=- wrote: On Thu 06 May 2004 05:41:23p, N8KDV wrote in message : WA4009SWL wrote: From Drudge: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html Are you happy now Fat Boy? Aren't you the optimistic one! Yes I am. I figure that sooner or later the Fat Boy's doctor will hit upon just the right combination of meds and that he'll finally get his sorry life straightened out. But I'm not holding my breath until I turn blue either! |
-=jd=- wrote:
Aren't you the optimistic one! The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less than Bush's head on a pike. The secret service is already hunting down children who thought of that. http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/1083730267 mike |
-=jd=- wrote:
Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. ================================================ http://www.sport-touring.net/cgi-bin...;t=15248;&#top http://tinyurl.com/3gozg =============================================== PROSSER, Wash. -- A high school student in Prosser, Washington, got a visit from the Secret Service when his art teacher saw his artwork and contacted school officials who in turn contacted the police. The 15-year-old's artwork depicted George W. Bush as the devil launching missiles, while another picture showed Bush's head on a pike. The student was questioned, but not arrested. http://www.ncbuy.com/news/2004-04-27/1009482.html =============================================== |
m II wrote: -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. Oh there's more confusion going on than that! Don't you have things to worry about in Canada? Or is it just that absolutely NOTHING happens there and you have to focus your thoughts on the USA? For a country which you seem to have such little regard for you certainly seem to focus an inordinate amount of time on us! You're obviously all totally bored! |
"N8KDV" wrote in message ... m II wrote: -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. Oh there's more confusion going on than that! Don't you have things to worry about in Canada? Or is it just that absolutely NOTHING happens there and you have to focus your thoughts on the USA? For a country which you seem to have such little regard for you certainly seem to focus an inordinate amount of time on us! You're obviously all totally bored! There's only one Canadian team still alive for the Stanley Cup. They have a lot of time on their hands. |
"T. Early" wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... m II wrote: -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. Oh there's more confusion going on than that! Don't you have things to worry about in Canada? Or is it just that absolutely NOTHING happens there and you have to focus your thoughts on the USA? For a country which you seem to have such little regard for you certainly seem to focus an inordinate amount of time on us! You're obviously all totally bored! There's only one Canadian team still alive for the Stanley Cup. They have a lot of time on their hands. Ahhhhhhh... that explains it. |
T. Early wrote:
There's only one Canadian team still alive for the Stanley Cup. They have a lot of time on their hands. So..who'se gonna win? mike...he SHOOTS...he BORES! |
-=jd=- wrote: On Thu 06 May 2004 08:14:26p, m II wrote in message news:CxAmc.28473$U75.24931@edtnps89: -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. ================================================ http://www.sport-touring.net/cgi-bin...ikonboard.cgi? s=e3e05e0009b cd14f15c2b4efe12e1a0f;act=ST;f=13;t=15248;&#top http://tinyurl.com/3gozg =============================================== PROSSER, Wash. -- A high school student in Prosser, Washington, got a visit from the Secret Service when his art teacher saw his artwork and contacted school officials who in turn contacted the police. The 15-year-old's artwork depicted George W. Bush as the devil launching missiles, while another picture showed Bush's head on a pike. The student was questioned, but not arrested. http://www.ncbuy.com/news/2004-04-27/1009482.html =============================================== Looks to me like the cops and Secret Service were simply doing the job they are expected to do. The school voiced concerns and the Secret Service is obligated to check out threats to the president that are brought to their attention, even if it looks like a waste of time going in. However, they never know when they may have another Hinkley on their hands, so they have to at least make contact and get some kind of impression. This sounds exactly like what they did - made the mandatory standard contact with the kid and left it at that. The big question is why did the school notify the police over this kid's artwork? The school is probably more familiar with the kid than the police or feds. Now why would the school, who is presumably familiar with the kid, call the cops? Hmmmm... Pssssst.... you're asking to many of the right questions. |
On 07 May 2004 00:56:39 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Thu 06 May 2004 08:14:26p, m II wrote in message news:CxAmc.28473$U75.24931@edtnps89: -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. ================================================ http://www.sport-touring.net/cgi-bin...ikonboard.cgi? s=e3e05e0009b cd14f15c2b4efe12e1a0f;act=ST;f=13;t=15248;&#top http://tinyurl.com/3gozg =============================================== PROSSER, Wash. -- A high school student in Prosser, Washington, got a visit from the Secret Service when his art teacher saw his artwork and contacted school officials who in turn contacted the police. The 15-year-old's artwork depicted George W. Bush as the devil launching missiles, while another picture showed Bush's head on a pike. The student was questioned, but not arrested. http://www.ncbuy.com/news/2004-04-27/1009482.html =============================================== Looks to me like the cops and Secret Service were simply doing the job they are expected to do. The school voiced concerns and the Secret Service is obligated to check out threats to the president that are brought to their attention, even if it looks like a waste of time going in. However, they never know when they may have another Hinkley on their hands, so they have to at least make contact and get some kind of impression. This sounds exactly like what they did - made the mandatory standard contact with the kid and left it at that. The big question is why did the school notify the police over this kid's artwork? The school is probably more familiar with the kid than the police or feds. Now why would the school, who is presumably familiar with the kid, call the cops? Hmmmm... -=jd=- One word will answer it ...... LIABILITY. If the kid does anything violent and it is found the school saw his pictures and did nothing they become, in our society, the responsible party. In my days as a student, the teacher would've notified the Principal and they would've called the parents ........ but that was back when a higher percentage of parents actually parented. Well, that's my take on it. Howard |
Frank White wrote: In article , says... On Thu 06 May 2004 05:41:23p, N8KDV wrote in message : WA4009SWL wrote: From Drudge: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html Are you happy now Fat Boy? Aren't you the optimistic one! The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less than Bush's head on a pike. Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head on a pike... I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. |
N8KDV wrote:
I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? mike |
= = = (WA4009SWL) wrote in message
= = = ... From Drudge: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html MWB - Brenda Lee said it best: - I'm Sorry, So Sorry - Please Accept My Apology LYRICS to I'M SORRY: http://www.lyrics007.com/Lee%20Brenda%20Lyrics/I'm%20Sorry%20Lyrics.html I'm sorry, so sorry That I was such a fool I didn't know Love could be so cruel Oh oh oh oh uh-oh oh yes You tell me mistakes Are part of being young But that don't right The wrong that's been done (I'm sorry) I'm sorry (So sorry) So sorry Please accept my apology But love is blind And I was to blind to see. Oh oh oh oh uh-oh oh yes You tell me mistakes Are part of being young But that don't right The wrong that's been done Oh oh oh oh uh-oh oh yes I'm sorry, so sorry Please accept my apology But love was blind And I was too blind to see .. . . Sorry jftfoi ~ RHF .. |
m II wrote: N8KDV wrote: I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? Yep, Tabasco, all over the burrito I'm having. And a glass of milk with it. Nice of you to ask though, **** for brains. |
Liability could be part of it. It could also be the kid has given the teachers reason to be concerned about him before. We will probably never know exactly. He was checked out and that appears to be the end of it. As far as I'm concerned, it's a non-issue. -=jd=- -- There may be more to it.. but there doesn't have to be. When I was in high school, back in the early 70's, there were a lot of bomb threats happening in places all over the country.. Our prinicipal was a moron, and very long winded. He would spend 15 minutes on the PA each morning droning on and on about some sort of useless drivel that neither us nor the teachers wanted to hear. Well, I had an extremely rare moment of inspiration, and drew a crude political cartoon combining these two issues. In the first panel, the front of the school was shown, with a speech bubble showing the principal prattling on. Second panel was much the same (blah blah blah hadn't been invented yet, so I used some of his actual droning). Third panel showed the school going up with a big boom. Fourth one showed a PA speaker dangling by it's wires from a column in the middle of the mess, still droning.. and then ending up by saying "Oh, yes, and by the way, we've had a bomb threat." The cartoon was meant to make light of the principal and his lack of priority and boring nature, but my homeroom teacher didn't think much of it. She confiscated it, and the next thing I knew, I was talking to FBI agents from Portland.. And I was a B+ average student, and never caused any sort of trouble.. how much more 'cautious' must schools be now... :( |
Brenda Ann Dyer wrote:
Well, I had an extremely rare moment of inspiration, and drew a crude political cartoon combining these two issues. In the first panel, the front of the school was shown, with a speech bubble showing the principal prattling on. Second panel was much the same (blah blah blah hadn't been invented yet, so I used some of his actual droning). Third panel showed the school going up with a big boom. Fourth one showed a PA speaker dangling by it's wires from a column in the middle of the mess, still droning.. and then ending up by saying "Oh, yes, and by the way, we've had a bomb threat." That's a pretty observant cartoon. You may have missed your calling. mike |
On Fri, 7 May 2004 13:01:18 +0900, "Brenda Ann Dyer"
wrote: Liability could be part of it. It could also be the kid has given the teachers reason to be concerned about him before. We will probably never know exactly. He was checked out and that appears to be the end of it. As far as I'm concerned, it's a non-issue. -=jd=- -- There may be more to it.. but there doesn't have to be. When I was in high school, back in the early 70's, there were a lot of bomb threats happening in places all over the country.. Our prinicipal was a moron, and very long winded. He would spend 15 minutes on the PA each morning droning on and on about some sort of useless drivel that neither us nor the teachers wanted to hear. Well, I had an extremely rare moment of inspiration, and drew a crude political cartoon combining these two issues. In the first panel, the front of the school was shown, with a speech bubble showing the principal prattling on. Second panel was much the same (blah blah blah hadn't been invented yet, so I used some of his actual droning). Third panel showed the school going up with a big boom. Fourth one showed a PA speaker dangling by it's wires from a column in the middle of the mess, still droning.. and then ending up by saying "Oh, yes, and by the way, we've had a bomb threat." The cartoon was meant to make light of the principal and his lack of priority and boring nature, but my homeroom teacher didn't think much of it. She confiscated it, and the next thing I knew, I was talking to FBI agents from Portland.. And I was a B+ average student, and never caused any sort of trouble.. how much more 'cautious' must schools be now... :( Bull****... Tracy |
MII,
This sort of Action by the US Secret Service for a Long Long Time. STORY: A 'little' Kid wrote a letter to the US President. In the Letter the Kid said that the she was Mad at the President because the her Daddy had lost his Job. NOTE: The Father had been saying that he had lost his Job 'becasue of the US President's Economic Policies. FWIW: The US President was "IKE" in the 1950s. And Now You Know.... The Rest of the Story ~ RHF .. .. = = = m II wrote in message = = = news:CxAmc.28473$U75.24931@edtnps89... -=jd=- wrote: Errr... wrong link, Mike. That link took me to a report about Kerry waffling again. It was the report where he displayed his "Righteous Indignation" over Bush chartering a bus made in Canada, while Kerry chartered the same bus. Sorry about that. I seem to have some 'cut and paste confusion' going on in the computer. ================================================ http://www.sport-touring.net/cgi-bin...;t=15248;&#top http://tinyurl.com/3gozg =============================================== PROSSER, Wash. -- A high school student in Prosser, Washington, got a visit from the Secret Service when his art teacher saw his artwork and contacted school officials who in turn contacted the police. The 15-year-old's artwork depicted George W. Bush as the devil launching missiles, while another picture showed Bush's head on a pike. The student was questioned, but not arrested. http://www.ncbuy.com/news/2004-04-27/1009482.html =============================================== |
In article YUCmc.5240$uN4.598@clgrps12, says...
N8KDV wrote: I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? I have doubts as to his sanity. And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and lack of veracity. It is best to ignore him completely and allow him to waste his life in impotent babble. FW |
Frank 'I'm confused today' White wrote: In article YUCmc.5240$uN4.598@clgrps12, says... N8KDV wrote: I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? I have doubts as to his sanity. Well we all know yours took a hike a long time ago! |
Frank White wrote:
And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and lack of veracity. Able alliteration ascribes all attributes... mike |
From: (Frank White)
N8KDV wrote: I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's ass. Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? I have doubts as to his sanity. And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and lack of veracity. It is best to ignore him completely and allow him to waste his life in impotent babble. Here, here! Elegantly eloquent. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... I don't go for those "sissy" sports - I'm a fly-fisherman... BWHAHAHAH. Yeah, those six inch trout can do some damage. |
Michael 'Things just never go right cause I'm a retard!' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve? I have doubts as to his sanity. Well we all know yours took a hike a long time ago! Predictable Lare response. He must've been the Man in the 3rd grade. You must have been the Man who didn't finish his PhD! |
On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote
(in article ): In article , says... On Thu 06 May 2004 05:41:23p, N8KDV wrote in message : WA4009SWL wrote: From Drudge: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html Are you happy now Fat Boy? Aren't you the optimistic one! The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less than Bush's head on a pike. Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head on a pike... FW I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's. For starters. Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts of people were mentioned over and over and over. Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so maybe he said "and contractors". Did he? If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as GI's. Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States government who - present or past - had any close associations with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made. That is, of course, Halliburton. The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke - I felt like throwing up). And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious, boys and girls. Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of War)? It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought. And, if so, against whom. Gray Shockley -------------------------------------------------------- 33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT United States Army (retired) |
|
On Fri, 7 May 2004 17:58:36 -0500, jd=- wrote
(in article ) : On Fri 07 May 2004 03:24:47p, Gray Shockley wrote in message : On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote (in article ): In article , says... {snippage} The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less than Bush's head on a pike. Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head on a pike... FW I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's. For starters. Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts of people were mentioned over and over and over. Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so maybe he said "and contractors". Did he? If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as GI's. Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States government who - present or past - had any close associations with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made. That is, of course, Halliburton. The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke - I felt like throwing up). And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious, boys and girls. Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of War)? It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought. And, if so, against whom. Gray Shockley -------------------------------------------------------- 33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT United States Army (retired) What surprised me the most was the lack of the inquisitors to register any sustainable fault with the corrective actions taken so far. It would appear the only sustainable beef the committe had was that they were not informed in a timely manner. The corrective actions already taken and under way seem to be more than adequate and the committee members seemed a bit frustrated that there was nothing they could complain about - other than they weren't in the loop. Almost as if they were ****ed that they didn't have the opportunity to sternly and with full righteous indignation towards the Generals, order them to do what they were already doing. One got the impression they felt cheated out of a few satisfying "Harrumphs!" -=jd=- My overall response was: "Uh, guys; these people aren't professionals". Bush and crew really appear to need adult leadership very, very badly. I think I was residing in a lovely city in the Central Highlands the last time I heard this musical question: "Would you buy a used war from this man". That time it was President Nixon. Gray Shockley ------------------------------------------- For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken |
Gray Shockley wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2004 17:58:36 -0500, jd=- wrote (in article ) : On Fri 07 May 2004 03:24:47p, Gray Shockley wrote in message : On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote (in article ): In article , says... {snippage} The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less than Bush's head on a pike. Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head on a pike... FW I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's. For starters. Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts of people were mentioned over and over and over. Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so maybe he said "and contractors". Did he? If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as GI's. Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States government who - present or past - had any close associations with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made. That is, of course, Halliburton. The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke - I felt like throwing up). And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious, boys and girls. Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of War)? It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought. And, if so, against whom. Gray Shockley -------------------------------------------------------- 33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT United States Army (retired) What surprised me the most was the lack of the inquisitors to register any sustainable fault with the corrective actions taken so far. It would appear the only sustainable beef the committe had was that they were not informed in a timely manner. The corrective actions already taken and under way seem to be more than adequate and the committee members seemed a bit frustrated that there was nothing they could complain about - other than they weren't in the loop. Almost as if they were ****ed that they didn't have the opportunity to sternly and with full righteous indignation towards the Generals, order them to do what they were already doing. One got the impression they felt cheated out of a few satisfying "Harrumphs!" -=jd=- My overall response was: "Uh, guys; these people aren't professionals". Bush and crew really appear to need adult leadership very, very badly. I think I was residing in a lovely city in the Central Highlands the last time I heard this musical question: "Would you buy a used war from this man". That time it was President Nixon. But this time it was Bush's war from the start, and all gleaming new and shiny and running well one short year ago. Gray Shockley ------------------------------------------- For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com