|
New Polls Show Bush Sinking Fast
From today's USA Today
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...2004-05-06-gal lup-poll_x.htm or for the URL-challenged: http://tinyurl.com/2hty4 |
"WA4009SWL" wrote in message ... From today's USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...2004-05-06-gal lup-poll_x.htm or for the URL-challenged: http://tinyurl.com/2hty4 Hiding behind another name Bryant? Six months before Election Day, President Bush receives the support of 44 percent of voters and Kerry 41 percent in the national poll of registered voters conducted for Fox News by Opinion Dynamics Corporation (search). The new results are within the poll's margin of error, as has been the case in Fox News poll head-to-head presidential matchups for more than two months. |
MnMikew wrote:
Hiding behind another name Bryant? Just because all of *his* messages have the following message ID. doesn't mean it's *always* him. I'm sure the 'mb-m-07' is purely coincidence and is shared by ...oh oh...wait a minute....never mind....bye.. mike |
"m II" wrote in message news:8Xwmc.5177$uN4.2595@clgrps12... MnMikew wrote: Hiding behind another name Bryant? Just because all of *his* messages have the following message ID. doesn't mean it's *always* him. I'm sure the 'mb-m-07' is purely coincidence and is shared by ...oh oh...wait a minute....never mind....bye.. mike Kinda new here arnt ya. |
m II wrote:
MnMikew wrote: Hiding behind another name Bryant? Just because all of *his* messages have the following message ID. doesn't mean it's *always* him. I'm sure the 'mb-m-07' is purely coincidence and is shared by ...oh oh...wait a minute....never mind....bye.. mike So much for conspiracy theories...there must be twenty or thirty other posters that have that same message ID..oh well.. A sampling: yourfatassaunt@aol |
MnMikew wrote:
Kinda new here arnt ya. I predate by a few years 'Tad Early' when he was still wondering if NOT drinking beer BUT still getting laid qualified him as a Republican. Sometimes I just read and wonder... mike |
On Thu, 06 May 2004 20:34:26 GMT, m II
wrote: m II wrote: MnMikew wrote: Hiding behind another name Bryant? Just because all of *his* messages have the following message ID. doesn't mean it's *always* him. I'm sure the 'mb-m-07' is purely coincidence and is shared by ...oh oh...wait a minute....never mind....bye.. mike So much for conspiracy theories...there must be twenty or thirty other posters that have that same message ID..oh well.. A sampling: yourfatassaunt@aol and they are all Bryant... Tracy |
"m II" wrote in message news:9nxmc.5180$uN4.1974@clgrps12... MnMikew wrote: Kinda new here arnt ya. I predate by a few years 'Tad Early' when he was still wondering if NOT drinking beer BUT still getting laid qualified him as a Republican. Sometimes I just read and wonder... How did I all of a sudden become a reference point? And to think, in the interest of good will and harmony, I was just in the process of giving you a pass on your latest whopper about all of those Al Jazeera reporters who have been "regularly" killed by the U. S. military. |
T. Early wrote:
"m II" wrote in message news:9nxmc.5180$uN4.1974@clgrps12... MnMikew wrote: Kinda new here arnt ya. I predate by a few years 'Tad Early' when he was still wondering if NOT drinking beer BUT still getting laid qualified him as a Republican. Sometimes I just read and wonder... How did I all of a sudden become a reference point? And to think, in the interest of good will and harmony, I was just in the process of giving you a pass on your latest whopper about all of those Al Jazeera reporters who have been "regularly" killed by the U. S. military. ================================================== ======= A reference point is GOOD. No need to get upset. It means you're a landmark! I like getting pass marks, so please reconsider... I could have sworn there was a discussion about what constitutes the makeup of either the 'right' or 'left. You had been in the newsgroup a little while by then and had just recently started the SWL hobby. I don't think I'm losing it... mike while by then |
"m II" wrote in message news:mjxmc.5179$uN4.894@clgrps12... m II wrote: MnMikew wrote: Hiding behind another name Bryant? Just because all of *his* messages have the following message ID. doesn't mean it's *always* him. I'm sure the 'mb-m-07' is purely coincidence and is shared by ...oh oh...wait a minute....never mind....bye.. mike So much for conspiracy theories...there must be twenty or thirty other posters that have that same message ID..oh well.. A sampling: yourfatassaunt@aol Look at Bryants SIG, you'll see his SWL callsign, aka his alter ego. |
MnMikew wrote:
Look at Bryants SIG, you'll see his SWL callsign, aka his alter ego. Doh! blushing mike II |
WA4009SWL 'I'm hopelessly addicted to lying' wrote: From today's USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...2004-05-06-gal lup-poll_x.htm or for the URL-challenged: http://tinyurl.com/2hty4 Back to using the fake callsign again Fat Boy? |
|
|
|
MWB,
If you are 'posting' "Directly-on-to-GOOGLE" via your ISP. Then GOOGLE may 'limit' you to a certain number of posts per 24 Hour period. [ If you use a News Reader {Service} then you may not have this problem. ] jm2cw ~ RHF .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: N8KDV Back to using the fake callsign again Fat Boy? Yep, someone must've complained. AOL wouldn't let me post to newsgroups until this morning. The problem is that neocons are blocked on the other account. Time to look for another ISP. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
|
Michael 'I fabricate!' Bryant wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Unless you are way off the deep-end on some other newsgroup, I find it incredulous that AOL restricted your account due to your posting activity in here. If, as you say, you were unable to post to newsgroups, does that mean you were able to login and get far enough to determine that newsgroup posting was not available? That sounds to me more like AOL's news server was unavailable (maintenance, network-issues, whatever) - not that there was any sort of conspiracy or simple complaint that caused AOL to restrict your ability to post. There's no indication you should jump to a paranoid conclusion so quickly... This AOL Usenet reader would let me read, but not reply. Based on past experience, it's either someone making a complaint or AOL has some sort of maximum number of allowable replies in a 24-hour period. I was able to re-post this morning and found my self restricted again this afternoon. After calling AOL Tech service in Bombay, they were able to throw a switch and let me reply to USENET messages. Hope it lasts. Better apologise to me ****head... |
|
I have the same problem..
I contacted AOL Tech support; its a system problem, they don't have any idea when it'll be fixed.. Dan This AOL Usenet reader would let me read, but not reply. Based on past experience, it's either someone making a complaint or AOL has some sort of maximum number of allowable replies in a 24-hour period. |
Diverd4777 wrote:
I have the same problem.. I contacted AOL Tech support; its a system problem, they don't have any idea when it'll be fixed.. Get a real ISP people! Or post through Google. Dan This AOL Usenet reader would let me read, but not reply. Based on past experience, it's either someone making a complaint or AOL has some sort of maximum number of allowable replies in a 24-hour period. |
|
|
|
|
Michael 'I'm a fat piece of ****' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Better apologise to me ****head... You must be drunk.... And you most certainly must be on drugs... And you must be on something illegal if you think you'll get an apology from anyone.... Did you take lessons to be this social? Stop emailing me you fat piece of ****! |
On 08 May 2004 12:50:16 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote: From: N8KDV Better apologise to me ****head... You must be drunk.... And you most certainly must be on drugs... And you must be on something illegal if you think you'll get an apology from anyone.... Did you take lessons to be this social? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Don't know wht he would want one . It would just be lies and fabrication. Tracy |
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ... From: (Diverd4777) I have the same problem.. I contacted AOL Tech support; its a system problem, they don't have any idea when it'll be fixed.. They used that line at first, but I pointed out that I could post from my other account. The Indian help desk guy then started talking to a supervisor is Hindi. Thirty seconds later I was posting, again. Isn't it wonderful to ask for tech help from someone reading broken English from a script? MWB, sad, Sad. SAD ! "Isn't it wonderful to ask for tech help from someone reading broken English from a script?" A Man of 'your' Intellect and Education making such a "Insensitive" Statement about someone doing their best to Help You with a Problem. Can't You "Feel His Pain" in 'not being' the Great "MWB" ? ? ? ? ? [ The Mighty White Brother born to 'white privilege' in The USofA. ] MWB - Now Everyone Can See Your "Elitist" American White Boy Attitude. Why... It Boggles the Mind ~ RHF .. .. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com