|
why is the BBC
Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at
"Bush House, London". ;) |
Waterperson77 wrote:
Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) It's the morals of the landlord. mike |
|
"Frank White" wrote in message ... In article , says... Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush should consider doing things differently so the news isn't so negative. That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is warranted. |
It's Kate Bush's house, not Shrub's sphincter shack!
|
elg110254 wrote:
...Shrub's sphincter shack! http://www.weirdlinks.com/rumsfield-...ure-prison.htm mike |
On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote: "Frank White" wrote in message ... In article , says... Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush should consider doing things differently so the news isn't so negative. That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is warranted. Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC this has happened? |
wrote in message ... On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early" wrote: "Frank White" wrote in message ... In article , says... Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush should consider doing things differently so the news isn't so negative. That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is warranted. Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC this has happened? http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/report/ Your welcome. |
"T. Early" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early" wrote: "Frank White" wrote in message ... In article , says... Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush should consider doing things differently so the news isn't so negative. That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is warranted. Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC this has happened? http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/report/ Your welcome. Ouch, that would be "you're welcome" :) |
= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ... "Frank White" wrote in message ... In article , says... Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at "Bush House, London". ;) If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush should consider doing things differently so the news isn't so negative. That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is warranted. TE, The BBC and it's Reporters 'believe' that They are Right with a Certainty and therefore They are Not Biased. [ They are Blinded by Their Own Biases. ] Such is the Power of Belief ~ RHF .. |
RHF wrote:
The BBC and it's Reporters 'believe' that They are Right with a Certainty and therefore They are Not Biased. [ They are Blinded by Their Own Biases. ] Such is the Power of Belief ~ RHF Coming from one of the most dogmatic contributors on this group. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
LW,
Yes - I am Dogmatic :o) Yes - I am a Contributor :o) LW - Thank You for 'including' me as a Member of this NewsGroup :o) Yes - I am a Conservative and 'believe' the Liberals are wrong, Wrong. WRONG! ;-) Yes - I am Proud to be an American and I Love My Country :o) LW - Yes these are some of my very personal "Biases" :o) But NO ! - Unlike the BBC I am NOT Blinded by My Own Biases :-{ LW - Will the BBC make a Public Statement concerning the same - NOT ! So Say I - My Opinions Stated as Facts ~ RHF .. .. = = = longwave wrote in message = = = ... RHF wrote: The BBC and it's Reporters 'believe' that They are Right with a Certainty and therefore They are Not Biased. [ They are Blinded by Their Own Biases. ] Such is the Power of Belief ~ RHF Coming from one of the most dogmatic contributors on this group. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Which BBC?
On 21 May 2004 12:26:58 -0700, (RHF) wrote: Simply Listen or Watch the BBC everyday and 'discern' for Yourself. Today's 'bbc' is not the "BBC" of years ago ~ RHF . |
You claim to be conservative yet you support theocratic oligarchs.
Explain. On 22 May 2004 02:56:13 -0700, (RHF) wrote: |
david, David. DAVID !
What is there to Explain ? You have already 'stated' Your "Absurd" Conclusion [.] Need I Say More... ~ RHF .. .. = = = David wrote in message = = = . .. You claim to be conservative yet you support theocratic oligarchs. Explain. On 22 May 2004 02:56:13 -0700, (RHF) wrote: |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com