Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ruud Poeze" wrote: | And that is the whole point. | At this end of the ocean the DRM consortium people really believe in a | replacement of analogue AM broadcasting to digital within "a couple of | years". | AM to FM took almost 40 years, and AM is still on, the advantages to FM | over AM are more spectacular than DRM over AM in a world where also FM | is available and the most popular band. | Actualy DRM is ruining the AM band and I dont like the idea of one | broadcasting band with 2 incompatable modulation systems. | DRM only causes a lot of noise on your receiver and is already | irritating the audience. | | ruud *very* interesting, Ruud - do you do any listening using DRM yourself? I wonder how well DRM holds up when propagation conditions are changing, or perhaps during severe thunderstorms? 73, Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota (NOTE: My email address has only one "dot." You'll have to edit out the one between the "7" and the "3" in my email address if you wish to reply via email) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04 |