Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't
care if other people posting from the other
rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are
you guys from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to
behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I
want to know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.


You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.

You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted
the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P.

Yeah. Since you and the other bozos started cross posting I don't know
which group you post from or read. Sure I could subscribe to the other
groups and figure it out but why bother.

You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than
the people in RAT and RAR+P.

Yeah I did. I responded to you idiot. You must smoke up a large cloud
before posting.

However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The
answer is no.

I told you I'm through asking you to stop bozo. Got a reading
comprehension problem.

The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think.

Your disregard for anyone else's desire noted.

Nobody gives a damn about you either.

Although this is a public forum I doubt anyone cares what you think
either.

Flame all you want.

Thanks for your permission. If I had found the Trolling spoke person for
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes it would have saved some
time. What took you so long.

Oh well water over the dam and all that.

So what use does a pot smoking idiot with reading comprehension problems
have for tubes, phono's or antiques anyway? I think a person of your
caliber would have no use for any of it other than sniffing the varnish
or glue used to restore the stuff.

Amen.

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.


Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all three
groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the denizens
of each one.

Rgds,
Bill

In article ,
(Steven Dinius) wrote:

Telamon wrote in message
...
In article
,
Telamon wrote:

pOOr a%%whole baby troll...

Stop projecting.

Doesn't know how to create a rule in Outlook Express to delete the
thread before he/she/hermaphrodite worm sees it! Won't block a poster.

I have no idea what you are talking about. Rules? Blocking? What is
Outlook express?

Rules, you mean something like a body of principles governing a group?
Well I was under the impression people that subscribe from
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes would have none of that.

Blocking? Maybe you meant blockhead.

I'm not changing yer diaper, bitch, and I DO KNOW and I DID. Be
thankful I don't find where you come from and stuff abuse@... where
the sun doesn't shine.

Well thank god you changed yours. It was really starting to stink over
here. Sorry to hear you are still having problems in that regard. How
often do you need to change your diapers and why do you feel the need to
change them in the dark? I'd expect you could do a better job in the
light. I'll do my best to help.

Putrid trollop. Shut up and crawl back in the ditch.

We like to have fun with Trolls here. Thanks for identifying yourself.
I'll be looking forward to more exchanges like these.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article , Bill
wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.


Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all
three groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the
denizens of each one.

We all have our limitations Bill.

I'm doing my best to endear myself to the fine people cross posting from
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes.

Sure hope I've made a good impression with them.

You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it?

I don't know why these threads don't get cross posted to several other
dozen newsgroups that have radio in the title. I think the amateur
groups would benefit from these threads. Those people are interested in
BS and radio design after all. Seems like a good fit to me.

Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave
since the Bryant hiatus.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

In article , Bill
wrote:

You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it?

Yes, http://www.sparkbench.com Most of the sets have tubes and SW so
its "on topic" for this crossposting.
:-)


Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave
since the Bryant hiatus.

Don't worry unless you have a Llloyd and Bryant hiatus at the same time.

-BM

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.

Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.

Heck, post it again!

Telamon can't help it - he's bucking to be the next Fuhrer! "Post this! Don't
post that! Don't disagree with me otherwise you are a troll!". I would just
bet that he does a wonderful goose-step while trying to re-write FAQ's.

Keep on posting, guys! It's all part of the hobby.

Regards

John Barnard

Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.


You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.

You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted
the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P.

You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than
the people in RAT and RAR+P.

However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The
answer is no.

The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think.

Flame all you want.

Jeff

--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom"

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.

Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.

Heck, post it again!

Some people just don't know how to play nice.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote in message ...
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.

Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.

Heck, post it again!

Some people just don't know how to play nice.

You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups
are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner.

Telamon wrote in message ...
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.

Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.

Heck, post it again!

Some people just don't know how to play nice.

You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups
are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner.