LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 12:18 AM
Steven Dinius
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jon Noring wrote in message . ..
[Obligatory Telamon rec.radio.shortwave on-topic statement: The
following reply touches upon aspects of TRF design as they apply to MW
DXing, particularly sensitivity and selectivity of tube-based TRF
designs. MW DXing is on-topic to r.r.s. discussion. I appreciate
Telamon's efforts to keep r.r.s discussion strictly on-topic per the
written r.r.s. Charter.]


Telamon is being a petulant freak and the "usenet gods" as you mention
are dealing with him. Meanwhile I'm thinking of killing this file too.
So far I haven't cared to bother about finding out where your nonsense
really emanates from either. Other people have some interest in the
thread and it wouldn't be fair to them. My address is real though. You
won't get any reply without one, even if you do try it.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs Jon Noring Shortwave 85 June 14th 04 01:36 AM
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? Jon Noring Shortwave 5 June 11th 04 12:52 AM
MFJ969 Tuner Question Gene Vico Equipment 4 November 13th 03 12:27 AM
MFJ969 Tuner Question Gene Vico Equipment 0 November 12th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017