|
In article , "Ken Finney" wrote:
In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking -- Larry Weil Lake Wobegone, NH |
"Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". |
On 23 Jun 2004 21:39:59 GMT, Larry Weil ("Larry") writes:
Larry In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Larry Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking What media network is the NRA running that they intend as a sham to get around campaign finance laws and then shut down next year? I haven't heard of this until you mentioned it. |
"Ken Finney" wrote in message ... "Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". Excellent point, and, speaking of Air America and NPR, shouldn't there be a place at Air America for Terry Gross? |
= = = "Ken Finney" wrote in message
= = = ... "Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". KF - Why, Isn't NPR 'fair' and 'balanced' ? [NOT!] ~ RHF .. |
hate it! but it couldn't happen to nicer bunch of demoNAZIS
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Al Dykes wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Frank Dresser wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... Story on Drudge says Air America is strapped for cash, and had less than they claimed when they started. Looks like maybe the check for Chicago did bounce. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm Actually, the check never had a chance to bounce. Arthur Liu at Multicultural was told the check was stopped, so he shouldn't even bother depositing it. Matt Drudge has been taking a pointed interest in the Air America story, possibly because some numbnut at Air America wrote the infamous "Liu-ser" article ridiculing Drudge and Liu. "The WALL STREET JOURNAL reports on Monday: Several employees say they still haven't been reimbursed for the costs of attending the New York launch." "Many of Air America's investors and executives say they thought the network had raised more than $30 million, based on assurances from its owners, Guam-based entrepreneurs Evan M. Cohen and Rex Sorensen." "In fact, Air America had raised only $6 million, Mr. Cohen concedes" What were the investors thinking about, just before the network started up? Were they throwing their money into the Democratic party? The "Tyco Birthday Party"? "On March 30, the night before Air America went on the air, the liberal radio network threw itself a $70,000 party at Manhattan's hip Maritime Hotel." This story isn't new but it does add some details to the known problems Air America's management had. They announced a possible deal with new investors over a month ago. I have no idea how that's going. Air America may have been started up by incompetent businessmen, but they have shown there's a market for that kind of radio. If they can't do it right, somebody else will. Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. But they're not, are they? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. It seems that Fox was $150 million in the red for the first 2 years of operation. You can't expect them to be turning a profit in the first 2 months of operation. Yes, and FOX is a totally different type of operation, is it not? We're talking radio here... If there were a market for that type of show the stations would be breaking down Air America's door... and they are not. Fox ran in the red for two years. TV may dig a bigger hole, but it's still a hole. It's a rare startup company of any tipe that is profitable in the first year. The Wall Street Journal has a article about AA on Tuesday that I'm told was overall favorable about their business model. It's a rare startup company that begins with the lies and deceit of Air America! It's one thing to have a 'business model', and an entirely different thing if one is not following it. Proposals look great on paper, it's what is put into practice that finally tells the tale. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Within these hallowed halls, Larry Weil of added the
following to the collective conscience: In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Naw, they'd just shoot their mouths off. Come on, someone had to say it. ;-) |
Within these hallowed halls, T. Early of
added the following to the collective conscience: "Ken Finney" wrote in message ... "Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". Excellent point, and, speaking of Air America and NPR, shouldn't there be a place at Air America for Terry Gross? I always thought, shouldn't there be a place at NPR for Air America? I know, wherever I've lived, there being at least half a dozen Public FMs (88.1-91.9) that could take some of AA's broadcast day. |
"Ken Finney" wrote in message ...
"Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". Perhaps because Air America has every intent to remain in business--they just happened to come on the air during an election campaign. Perhaps you can tell us what your problem with the First Amendment is. |
In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. This kind of theory is interesting but pretty far-fetched. It's much simpler than that. Awesomely bad management with a truly faulty business model. It's that simple. I think it was a bunch of cocky TV "radio can't be very hard" people who came to realize that lying about their bank account and ridiculing the head of the two major markets they needed the most wasn't the best approach. If Rush Limbaugh, with 600+ stations, can't influence an election, Air America with 6 isn't going to have much better luck. Rich |
"Rich Wood" wrote in message ... In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. This kind of theory is interesting but pretty far-fetched. It's much simpler than that. Awesomely bad management with a truly faulty business model. It's that simple. I think it was a bunch of cocky TV "radio can't be very hard" people who came to realize that lying about their bank account and ridiculing the head of the two major markets they needed the most wasn't the best approach. If Rush Limbaugh, with 600+ stations, can't influence an election, Air America with 6 isn't going to have much better luck. Rich This is not an endorsement of Rush, but I'm not sure I agree with your premise there. While the Limbaughs of the world perpetually are preaching to the choir, IMO they are responsible for getting a fair amount of people to the polls who might otherwise sit home on their a**. To me, that's at least potentially influencing an election, particularly a close one. |
"Mark Jeffries" wrote in message ... "Ken Finney" wrote in message ... "Larry Weil" wrote in message ... In article , "Ken Finney" wrote: In my opinion, Air America NEVER intended to be a success (not that they wouldn't mind being so). The new campaign finance laws exempt "media" (or words to that effect) from the law. So, you set up a "network", unabashedly attack on of the parties, and then shut the operation down after the election. Ya mean like the NRA is trying to do? ducking Funny thing, I heard a lot of NRA bashing on NPR last weekend over this "loophole" in the law, I've never heard any Air America bashing on NPR over this "loophole". Perhaps because Air America has every intent to remain in business--they just happened to come on the air during an election campaign. Perhaps you can tell us what your problem with the First Amendment is. I have no problem with the First Amendment. I have just stated that I believe that the people behind AA have no intention of "making it a success". Of course, you can't admit that, and will deny it whenever it comes up. |
21C BBS wrote:
I always thought, shouldn't there be a place at NPR for Air America? I know, wherever I've lived, there being at least half a dozen Public FMs (88.1-91.9) that could take some of AA's broadcast day. AA is too far right for NPR. -- Spammers are people who are too lazy and cowardly to rob liquor stores, but still want to make money by stealing instead of working. -- Morely Dotes, The Open Sourceror's Apprentice |
On 26 Jun 2004 04:33:33 GMT, clifto wrote:
AA is too far right for NPR. Can you document that? FAIR has recently done an analysis of NPR and came up with figures that clearly dispute your claim. FAIR counts quite a few more conservatives as guests on NPR than knee-jerk anti-NPR people are used to complaining about. I don't recall hearing a single conservative guest on Air America. That would make Air America much farther left (by their own admission and promotion) than NPR. Rich |
"Rich Wood" wrote in message ... On 26 Jun 2004 04:33:33 GMT, clifto wrote: AA is too far right for NPR. Can you document that? FAIR has recently done an analysis of NPR and came up with figures that clearly dispute your claim. FAIR counts quite a few more conservatives as guests on NPR than knee-jerk anti-NPR people are used to complaining about. I don't recall hearing a single conservative guest on Air America. That would make Air America much farther left (by their own admission and promotion) than NPR. I think it was Boortz who said he was on Frankin. He also said never again. |
On 28 Jun 2004 16:38:10 GMT, "Paul Jensen"
wrote: I don't recall hearing a single conservative guest on Air America. That would make Air America much farther left (by their own admission and promotion) than NPR. I think it was Boortz who said he was on Frankin. He also said never again. Why on God's earth would Franken interview another talk show host, unless the shows were simulcast and Franken could get exposure on Boortz's stations? Did Boortz do something of news value that almost required an interview? Of course "never again." What did Boortz expect? Probably the same treatment a liberal would get on a conservative show. Two absolutely immovable objects ranting at each other. Same ol, same ol. Rich |
Rich Wood wrote in message ...
On 26 Jun 2004 04:33:33 GMT, clifto wrote: AA is too far right for NPR. Can you document that? FAIR has recently done an analysis of NPR and came up with figures that clearly dispute your claim. FAIR counts quite a few more conservatives as guests on NPR than knee-jerk anti-NPR people are used to complaining about. I don't recall hearing a single conservative guest on Air America. That would make Air America much farther left (by their own admission and promotion) than NPR. Rich RW, In the past when former president Clinton was president. NPR referred to him as President Clinton. Now what does NPR do when referring to "President Bush" they use negative omissions and detractive code words: simply referring to the President as "Bush" or 'mister' "Bush" and the "Bush" 'administration'. NPR is the primary propaganda organ for the Liberal Media ELITE [.] So Say I, My Opinions Stated As Facts ~ RHF .. |
"Paul Jensen" wrote in
: I think it was Boortz who said he was on Frankin. He also said never again. Franken caught Boortz in a lie about having offered Franken to guest-host Boortz's show (back before AA existed), and saying that Franken had refused because Boorts wouldn't allow him to control the phone callers. Franken called Boortz on the lie while on the phone with him, playing the tape of Boortz lying, then forcing Boortz to admit that he had lied. I heard the segment. Boortz came off as a lying, blowhard putz. Of COURSE Boortz said "never again" after that. -- |I always wanted to be someone,| Tom Betz, Generalist | |but now I think I should have | Want to send me email? | |been a wee bit more specific. | http://tinyurl.com/ps2u | |
In article ,
Tom Betz wrote: "Paul Jensen" wrote in : I think it was Boortz who said he was on Frankin. He also said never again. Franken caught Boortz in a lie about having offered Franken to guest-host Boortz's show (back before AA existed), and saying that Franken had refused because Boorts wouldn't allow him to control the phone callers. Franken called Boortz on the lie while on the phone with him, playing the tape of Boortz lying, then forcing Boortz to admit that he had lied. I heard the segment. Boortz came off as a lying, blowhard putz. Of COURSE Boortz said "never again" after that. Nobody burns their bridges like Franken does. With a 'Tude like that is anyone going to have him guest host their show or be a guest on their show. Newsgroups sniped. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Tom Betz" wrote in message ... "Paul Jensen" wrote in : I think it was Boortz who said he was on Frankin. He also said never again. Franken caught Boortz in a lie about having offered Franken to guest-host Boortz's show (back before AA existed), and saying that Franken had refused because Boorts wouldn't allow him to control the phone callers. Franken called Boortz on the lie while on the phone with him, playing the tape of Boortz lying, then forcing Boortz to admit that he had lied. I heard the segment. Boortz came off as a lying, blowhard putz. Lying, blowhard putz? Speaking of Michael Moore, did you ever pin down the alleged "lie" by Fred Barnes that had the humor-challenged all in a tizzy? |
Quoth "T. Early" in news:cbqv44$t64$1
@xuxa.iecc.com: Lying, blowhard putz? Speaking of Michael Moore, did you ever pin down the alleged "lie" by Fred Barnes that had the humor-challenged all in a tizzy? Last I heard, Barnes never called Franken back. -- "I am afeard there are few die well that die in a battle; for how can they charitably dispose of anything when blood is their argument? Now, if these men do not die well, it will be a black matter for the King that led them to it; who to disobey were against all proportion of subjection." - W.S. |
|
"Mark Jeffries" wrote in message ... (RHF) wrote in message ... In the past when former president Clinton was president. NPR referred to him as President Clinton. Now what does NPR do when referring to "President Bush" they use negative omissions and detractive code words: simply referring to the President as "Bush" or 'mister' "Bush" and the "Bush" 'administration'. Just another troll with a bad memory. NPR, and many other news organisations, will use all three forms just to avoid being repetitive. Regardless of the person or party holding the office. Same goes for Representatives and Senators. Shheeessshhh! Could we PLEASE refrain from keeping these useless, wasteful and off-topic threads (although this one is less so than most of the crap that's been droning on-and-on for the last two weeks) from bloating this newsgroup? I, and I'm sure quite a bunch more, would appreciate it! By now you should know who is and who is not worth engaging. Use that knowledge to do the best thing, which is to just ignore them. Or put them in your kill file. They can't talk to themselves (although there may be a few who don't quite meet that criteria, either)! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- There must always be the appearance of lawfulness....especially when the law's being broken. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
= = = (Mark Jeffries) wrote in message
= = = ... (RHF) wrote in message ... In the past when former president Clinton was president. NPR referred to him as President Clinton. Now what does NPR do when referring to "President Bush" they use negative omissions and detractive code words: simply referring to the President as "Bush" or 'mister' "Bush" and the "Bush" 'administration'. Documentation, please--and don't just copy from NewsMax. The President is generally always referred to in the first reference as "President ---" and in the second reference as "Mr. ---." That's basic AP Stylebook. I did a search on npr.org and found 3,518 pages that have on them "President Bush." Granted, some of them may refer to George H.W. Bush and are likely not transcripts of stories that are audio hyperlinked, but it seems to me that NPR is following basic stylebook on references to the President. And at NPR, as at many other journalistic organizations, the President is always heard last in a story, no matter what party he belongs to. That's also pretty much Journalism 101. NPR is the primary propaganda organ for the Liberal Media ELITE [.] Then why are the extreme left-wing nutsos at FAIR continually attacking NPR for right-wing bias? MJ, Because to use your words they are "extreme left-wing nutsos at FAIR" NPR may be Left-Wing and Liberal but it is not Extreme [.] .. .. Why does Amy Goodman of Pacifica refer to NPR as part of "corporate media?" You feel that NewsMax is not creditable but then cite Pacifica ? .. .. Why did I hear a bunch of hardcore lefties at a forum I once attended *boo* a mention of NPR? Because to use your words they are "hardcore lefties" TIP - Find a Forum were you fit-in and do NOT view the other members as either 'extreme' or 'hardcore' Lefties or Righties. .. .. As far as I'm concerned, if the extremist wackos on both sides hate NPR, they must be doing something right. So Two Wrongs Do Make a Right :o) ~ RHF .. |
On 2 Jul 2004 14:52:13 GMT, RHF ("RHF") writes:
RHF "Lock and Load the Latest" - New York Times - July 1, 2004 RHF NYT= http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/01/op...01THU4.html?th RHF The National Rifle Association has begun a three-hour daily RHF show on satellite radio, a transparent exercise in RHF propaganda disguised as journalism. The NRA, an organization that has been in business for over 100 years, is an established national media outlet which has up till now been involved in television and magazines (it has more subscribers than, for example, "Newsweek"). Now they've added issue-oriented radio. That's different from Air America, whose programming seems to be entirely devoted to a particular canndidate (George Bush). The only thing in common is that they are both are engaging in what is supposed to be the most protected class of free speech. |
Listening to Air America here in NY on WLIB 1190
- Ads for Home Depot, Playboy ( ! ! ! ) Touting the interview with Michael Moore in The July Issue Many other ads; Gets bothersome there are so many.. _ SOOOO.... A Business 101 Graduate could take these and other ad contracts to the bank, arrange a line of credit & keep the whole thing going Finding advertisers doesn't seem to be a problem for them Plus They are on Sirius XM ( Sat radio ) - So they stand to be around for a while |
In article , dxAce
writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. Utter BS, Steve; Michael Moore has the Highest Grossing Film in The U.S. This week; - & he's NOT someone you'd call a neocon.. |
In article , dxAce
writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan |
Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. Utter BS, Steve; Michael Moore has the Highest Grossing Film in The U.S. This week; - & he's NOT someone you'd call a neocon.. Nope, I'd call him a liar and a fabricator. This week? I thought perhaps Spiderman was outselling him this week. At any rate, you are somehow trying to equate $$$ with the truth. Consider this: StarWars made a lot of money also, but it too had nothing to do with the truth. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) |
Curmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0400, dxAce wrote: Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. More lies and fabrications. Where will it all end? It goes straight back to the White House. BUSH LIED..... Well, we know for sure that Clinton lied, Gore lied and now there is a new contender, John F. Kerry. He's been lying at least since the late 60's. |
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 06:46:38 -0400, dxAce wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0400, dxAce wrote: Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. More lies and fabrications. Where will it all end? It goes straight back to the White House. BUSH LIED..... Well, we know for sure that Clinton lied, Gore lied and now there is a new contender, John F. Kerry. He's been lying at least since the late 60's. If you don't like it then leave. I supported Clinton without regard to what he did. Blindly. Because I'm a patriot. Otherwise - people might have said I supported terrorists. |
"Diverd4777" wrote in message ... In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. [list of celebrities snipped} I don't know the politics of most scientists/inventors, but Iris and Stanford Ovshinsky seem pretty liberal: http://www.bu.edu/alumni/bostonia/20...les/energetic/ Warren Buffet is liberal, at least by my standard. Bobby Fischer isn't a liberal, he's a kook. Frank Dresser |
Bill E wrote: On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 06:46:38 -0400, dxAce wrote: Curmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0400, dxAce wrote: Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. More lies and fabrications. Where will it all end? It goes straight back to the White House. BUSH LIED..... Well, we know for sure that Clinton lied, Gore lied and now there is a new contender, John F. Kerry. He's been lying at least since the late 60's. If you don't like it then leave. What, give the Liberal commies a chance to take over? Never! Let freedom reign. Bush-Cheney 04 |
Last week while I was near New York City I tuned in Air America on WLIB. I
didn't hear any seroius discussions concerning the elections or anything else. All I heard were "comedy bits" and chatter. |
In article , dxAce
wrote: Bill E wrote: On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 06:46:38 -0400, dxAce wrote: Curmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0400, dxAce wrote: Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. More lies and fabrications. Where will it all end? It goes straight back to the White House. BUSH LIED..... Well, we know for sure that Clinton lied, Gore lied and now there is a new contender, John F. Kerry. He's been lying at least since the late 60's. If you don't like it then leave. What, give the Liberal commies a chance to take over? Never! Let freedom reign. I listened to Bush's Fourth of July speech on AFRTS this morning from Pearl Harbor on 10,320 KHz. It was OK but I wish he talked more about the historical event than current events. Then I was surprised to hear "and now for the Democratic response, John Kerry." Why the hell should we have to listen to a Democratic response to a Presidential speech about the 4th of July holiday? Anyway Kerry used the opportunity to be a liberal idiot with a speech about the civil rights movement instead of talking about the holiday. We have a Martin Luther holiday to celebrate this, it just seemed inappropriate to me. The good news is the Kerry speech sounded like less of a sermon than usual. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Bill E wrote: On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 06:46:38 -0400, dxAce wrote: Curmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0400, dxAce wrote: Diverd4777 wrote: In article , dxAce writes: Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. OK Steve, Here's The List.. " There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. ( GONNNNNGGG ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ;-) Al Jourgensen Alec Baldwin Alyssa Milano Ani DiFranco Barbra Streisand Ben Affleck Bobby Fischer Bruce Springsteen Carlos Santana Cher Chrissie Hynde Danny Glover Dave Matthews David Clennon Dixie Chicks Dustin Hoffman Ed Asner Ed Harris Edward Norton Eminem Eric Roberts Ethan Hawke George Carlin George Clooney Gore Vidal Gwyneth Paltrow Harry Belafonte Jane Fonda Janeane Garofalo Jennifer Aniston Jessica Lange Jethro Tull John Cusack John Mellencamp Johnny Depp Joy Behar Julia Roberts Kate Hudson Larry Hagman Madonna Margaret Cho Martin Scorsese Martin Sheen Maynard Keenan Michael Moore Mike Farrell Moby Oliver Stone Pearl Jam Richard Gere Rickie Lee Jones Robert Altman Robin Williams Sandra Bernhard Sandy Duncan Sean Penn Spike Lee Susan Sarandon Tim Robbins Uma Thurman Viggo Mortensen Whoopi Goldberg Willie Nelson Woody Harrelson - Your words, not mine.. Dan All whiney little liberals. Am I supposed to be impressed? Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. More lies and fabrications. Where will it all end? It goes straight back to the White House. BUSH LIED..... Well, we know for sure that Clinton lied, Gore lied and now there is a new contender, John F. Kerry. He's been lying at least since the late 60's. If you don't like it then leave. What, give the Liberal commies a chance to take over? Never! Let freedom reign. I listened to Bush's Fourth of July speech on AFRTS this morning from Pearl Harbor on 10,320 KHz. It was OK but I wish he talked more about the historical event than current events. Then I was surprised to hear "and now for the Democratic response, John Kerry." Why the hell should we have to listen to a Democratic response to a Presidential speech about the 4th of July holiday? Anyway Kerry used the opportunity to be a liberal idiot with a speech about the civil rights movement instead of talking about the holiday. We have a Martin Luther holiday to celebrate this, it just seemed inappropriate to me. The good news is the Kerry speech sounded like less of a sermon than usual. Kerry doesn't need an *opportunity* to be a liberal idiot. He just is. Hoping you're enjoying the holiday. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
dxAce wrote:
Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. How did they lie? They didn't say that they'd leave if he was appointed, only if he was actually elected. -- Mike NAR #70953 - Sr/HPR Level-1 ~ BEMRC - NAR Section #627 NO Junk Email, please! Real email to: amphoto [at] blarg [dot] net. WANTED: Experienced Kamikaze Pilot |
"Mike Pearson " wrote: dxAce wrote: Seems as though I spy one or two there who stated before that if George Bush won the election (past) that they'd leave the country. They lied, and that is just so typical of whiney little liberals. How did they lie? They didn't say that they'd leave if he was appointed, only if he was actually elected. And indeed he was, better go do some research, you whiney little liberal 'tard. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com