"Eric Ferguson" wrote in message
...
It covers some weird ranges, doesn't? 8.60-9.10?, 13.35-16.05 +
15.15-16.40?
Weird overlap. Doesn't even cover all of some of the major bands (49M,
31M).
Even with no stereo, I'll keep the Sony 7600D as my travel anywhere radio.
At least I have full coverage AND a BFO plus 10 memories. 'Course the
VR-500
is even smaller and does more (cost more too!). Still, for eight bucks, it
might be a way to introduce SW radio to a newbie.....Eric


Yes I agree, but you can't honestly compare a Yaesu VR500 to a dedicated
short-wave radio. I have the VR500 and recently bought a 7600GR, there is no
comparison at all the Sony blows the VR500 away.
regards
Alan

"Valerie Wilding" wrote in message
...

"Eric Ferguson" wrote in message
...
It covers some weird ranges, doesn't? 8.60-9.10?, 13.35-16.05 +
15.15-16.40?
Weird overlap. Doesn't even cover all of some of the major bands (49M,
31M).
Even with no stereo, I'll keep the Sony 7600D as my travel anywhere
radio.
At least I have full coverage AND a BFO plus 10 memories. 'Course the
VR-500
is even smaller and does more (cost more too!). Still, for eight bucks,
it
might be a way to introduce SW radio to a newbie.....Eric


Yes I agree, but you can't honestly compare a Yaesu VR500 to a dedicated
short-wave radio. I have the VR500 and recently bought a 7600GR, there is
no
comparison at all the Sony blows the VR500 away.
regards
Alan



I agree 100%, the vr500 is a complete joke on HF, most of these cheap
multipurpose scanners are. you need something like a fairhaven to do that
sort of task.
Rikk

Rikk, Alan, As to the '500 being a joke, well, it may not be the best, but
for something I want to do in the future, it was the radio of choice.

I needed a small radio that tuned *everything* as I'm trying to get in shape
for a 1,900 mile bike trip ('bout 5 years from now). With a bigger antenna,
you have to use the attenuator, but the radio does do well with smaller
ones. Space on the bike (As of now a bikeE recumbent, a gift from a friend
of mine) is at a premium. Can't remember the Diamond antenna's designation
(one of the best one's) but that antenna and/or the RS Extendable, regularly
get me RNZI, WWVH, and a number of other stations, here near San
Francisco.At night AM reception can be very good.

Also appreciate the fact that it has the USB/LSB and NAM along with the
bandscope.

Till something as small with all the features comes along (that I can
afford), I'll stay with the '500 for the radio of choice for bike travel.
Also got it on eBay for $125 (when I had a job!). Eric

"Eric Ferguson" wrote in message
m...
Rikk, Alan, As to the '500 being a joke, well, it may not be the best, but
for something I want to do in the future, it was the radio of choice.

I needed a small radio that tuned *everything* as I'm trying to get in
shape
for a 1,900 mile bike trip ('bout 5 years from now). With a bigger
antenna,
you have to use the attenuator, but the radio does do well with smaller
ones. Space on the bike (As of now a bikeE recumbent, a gift from a friend
of mine) is at a premium. Can't remember the Diamond antenna's designation
(one of the best one's) but that antenna and/or the RS Extendable,
regularly
get me RNZI, WWVH, and a number of other stations, here near San
Francisco.At night AM reception can be very good.

Also appreciate the fact that it has the USB/LSB and NAM along with the
bandscope.

Till something as small with all the features comes along (that I can
afford), I'll stay with the '500 for the radio of choice for bike travel.
Also got it on eBay for $125 (when I had a job!). Eric



I said that the VR500 was a joke if you try and use it as a HF receiver
(which it is) I have a small portable Ten-Tec short-wave radio (I also have
a vr500) and the Ten-Tec cost around £10.00 uk pounds, it is FAR better than
the vr500 on short-wave. The vr500 is a half decent handheld scanner, it is
good for what it was mainly intended for, VHF/UHF scanning, apart from that,
it's crap
Alan