More AM & cancer (?)
|
T. Early wrote:
Well, at least we only have 50KW stations. http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,...tml?tw=rss.TOP If I remember correctly, US television picture signals are broadcast as AM and can reach 100,000 watts maximum. mike -- __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / / / /\ \/ /\ \/ /\ \/ / /_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ ..let the cat out to reply.. ©Densa International 'Think tanks cleaned cheap' |
"m II" wrote in message news:WPuUc.34797$fz2.21978@edtnps89... T. Early wrote: Well, at least we only have 50KW stations. http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,...tml?tw=rss.TOP If I remember correctly, US television picture signals are broadcast as AM and can reach 100,000 watts maximum. 1) The study refers to MW AM stations only (and I haven't the foggiest where they found any 100KW stations here). 2) While it is true that for the time being System M television pictures are broadcast using vestigial sideband AM (analog television is still slated to be off the air by 4/2008), there are no high power stations in or near residential neighborhoods (the study states that the effect is held to within 2 Km (about 1 1/4 miles) of the tower.) 3) There are US television stations on the UHF band which broadcast with in excess of 5,000,000 watts ERP, with aural carriers about 10% of that. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com