|
On The Fence
"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union address), how come we found nothing? You really need to get up to speed, Art. You been away for a while? And if so, where were you and why? OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion? Art H. |
In article , dxAce
wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: "dxAce" wrote: Harris wrote: Stop right there. Snip OK. You need to do a whole lot more research, Art. What arrogance! Who the hell are you to claim I need to do more research? I am dxAce. And you really need to put the pieces together in a better fashion than you have to date. Your arguments are not very convincing, at least to me. He should move to Massachusetts. Might have better luck. This guy Arthur Harris is quite the arrogant one. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
"Arthur Harris" wrote: "dxAce" wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union address), how come we found nothing? You really need to get up to speed, Art. You been away for a while? And if so, where were you and why? OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion? Gee I don't know. How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find? How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find? How many did the UN say we would find? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Telamon" wrote: "Arthur Harris" wrote: OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion? Gee I don't know. How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find? How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find? How many did the UN say we would find? The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle over WMD that no one could find. But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD finds have I missed since the invasion started? Art H. |
Arthur Harris wrote: "Telamon" wrote: "Arthur Harris" wrote: OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion? Gee I don't know. How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find? How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find? How many did the UN say we would find? The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle over WMD that no one could find. But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD finds have I missed since the invasion started? You also need to get your meds adjusted. Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly. Get a clue Harris! dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD finds have I missed since the invasion started? You also need to get your meds adjusted. Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly. Get a clue Harris! I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Let's hear some specifics. What WMD finds have I missed? Why did President Bush say that Kerry "served admirably, and he ought to be proud of his record" if Kerry's war record is a fraud (as you claim)? Art H. |
Doug Adler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:16 GMT, "Arthur Harris" wrote: "clifto" wrote: Harris wrote: Well it isn't easy trying to find something that's not there. Clearly, by March 2003 there were no WMD to be found, although that was the reason given for rushing into war. How do you explain that to the grieving relatives of those killed in action? It's pretty obvious in the aftermath that they were liberals who wouldn't have found anything unless they couldn't have avoided finding it. So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union address), how come we found nothing? Art H. You ain't got a clue! Now go look in the mirror, I think your tin foil hat is just a wee bit askew. The pattern continues... You can't make a cogent argument based on the facts, so you resort to personal insults. Art H. |
Telamon wrote:
Harris wrote: Authorizing the president to use force is much different than "voting for war." By God you are right. Bush should have gone over there by himself with a club. The nerve of him using our armed services for that purpose. No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD finds have I missed since the invasion started? You also need to get your meds adjusted. Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly. Get a clue Harris! I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? Something for you to think about. We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's. dxAce |
Harris wrote: Telamon wrote: Harris wrote: Authorizing the president to use force is much different than "voting for war." By God you are right. Bush should have gone over there by himself with a club. The nerve of him using our armed services for that purpose. No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. What wars you been in Artie? You ever volunteer for any? You ever serve in the Armed Forces? dxAce |
Harris wrote: Telamon wrote: Harris wrote: Authorizing the president to use force is much different than "voting for war." By God you are right. Bush should have gone over there by himself with a club. The nerve of him using our armed services for that purpose. No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. It would also seem that Kerry himself has an aversion to war when it actually involves him being in harms way. He got those medals just as fast as he could, anyway he could, and he ran, ran, just as fast as he could! A REAL 'hero' would have stayed with his men and completed his tour. dxAce A Navy and National Guard Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry. |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. It would also seem that Kerry himself has an aversion to war when it actually involves him being in harms way. He got those medals just as fast as he could, anyway he could, and he ran, ran, just as fast as he could! Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. It would also seem that Kerry himself has an aversion to war when it actually involves him being in harms way. He got those medals just as fast as he could, anyway he could, and he ran, ran, just as fast as he could! Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Please try and pay attention, Artie. I'm not doing a comparison at all. Try and do just a little bit of critical thinking, I know, I know, it's tough for you being a New York Liberal and all, but give it a try. dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. If my arguments are so weak, why can't you rebut them with logic instead of name calling? We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's. WMD is not just some tangential issue; it's the primary reason we got ourselves into this mess. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. No you're not. You're talking typical Liberal bull****. Someday, (maybe) you'll learn the difference. dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Please try and pay attention, Artie. I'm not doing a comparison at all. Try and do just a little bit of critical thinking, I know, I know, it's tough for you being a New York Liberal and all, but give it a try. Another non-responsive reply from DX Ace... Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Please try and pay attention, Artie. I'm not doing a comparison at all. Try and do just a little bit of critical thinking, I know, I know, it's tough for you being a New York Liberal and all, but give it a try. Another non-responsive reply from DX Ace... I responded did I not? You gonna respond to my other questions? I posed them twice already. Talk about non-response. Sheeesh... you gotta be a 'tard. dxAce |
|
In article et,
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. Snip Yes but your "issues" are personal and nobody else cares. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"dxAce" wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: From what I've seen posted here, those of you on the right are more interested in venting, and insulting those who disagree with you, than in having a discussion. Do you get much ribbing about your callsign? No, I don't. Sounds like you're trying to change the subject again. Well, I've got places to go and things to do, so I'll let you go back to whatever you do all day. Art H. |
Arthur Harris wrote: "dxAce" wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: From what I've seen posted here, those of you on the right are more interested in venting, and insulting those who disagree with you, than in having a discussion. Do you get much ribbing about your callsign? No, I don't. I mentioned your callsign to a few folks on the air here last night and the general consensus was that it's a pretty funny one, considering. Sounds like you're trying to change the subject again. Kind of like what you did when I asked you if you'd ever served in the Armed Forces... Well, I've got places to go and things to do, so I'll let you go back to whatever you do all day. Things to do? Make sure you take those meds, Artie. And tell your therapist I said hello. dxAce |
In article et, Harris
writes: Read the official Navy records. - Nope! Don't need no navy records; Just listen to the Porkchop Sucking Weasels in the ads.. You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Art H. hey ! Hey! Wait just a second.. When America Was under Attack, and The President was Informed a Second Plane had hit The World Trade Center - he kept Right on Schedule with the Photo Op.. - Talk about Courage under Fire.. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way. It would also seem that Kerry himself has an aversion to war when it actually involves him being in harms way. He got those medals just as fast as he could, anyway he could, and he ran, ran, just as fast as he could! Read the official Navy records. Certainly would like to read them ALL... have your candidate sign Form 109... Have your candidate agree to re-publish his book. Have your candidate allow his biographer to grant access to all of Kerry's records and diaries. dxAce |
Arthur Harris wrote:
"Telamon" wrote: How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find? How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find? How many did the UN say we would find? The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle over WMD that no one could find. None of them would send soldiers if the USA were invaded. They'd give speeches, negotiate, call on the UN to censor the invaders, but they wouldn't lift a finger to stop the invasion, not even when the polls came out 99.9% against them. -- If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine", how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda? |
Frank White wrote:
He is our resident poodle boy. Ignore him. That's best. God, what a blindingly brilliant refutation of dxAce's points! I stand in awe of your elocution. Truly you are one of today's great orators. -- If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine", how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda? |
Harris wrote:
Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" It was more like, "I blew up my butt with a hand grenade today, might as well get a medal out of it." -- If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine", how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda? |
clifto wrote: Harris wrote: Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" It was more like, "I blew up my butt with a hand grenade today, might as well get a medal out of it." Yes, that is pretty much the way it seems. "I blew up my butt with MY hand grenade today... ooops, now how do I report this without making myself look like the total fool that I am? Hmmmmmm... well I guess I could fudge the report just a teensy, weensy bit.... Yeah, that's the ticket! (First ticket on my way out of here!)". dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: "Telamon" wrote: "Arthur Harris" wrote: OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion? Gee I don't know. How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find? How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find? How many did the UN say we would find? The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle over WMD that no one could find. But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD finds have I missed since the invasion started? You also need to get your meds adjusted. Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly. Get a clue Harris! dxAce It's clear that you can't or don't want to address his questions, so you resort to your usual ad hominem attacks. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Harris wrote:
dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Please try and pay attention, Artie. I'm not doing a comparison at all. Try and do just a little bit of critical thinking, I know, I know, it's tough for you being a New York Liberal and all, but give it a try. Another non-responsive reply from DX Ace... That's his MO. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? Something for you to think about. More likely that you can't offer a well thought out rebuttal to his arguments. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. No you're not. You're talking typical Liberal bull****. Then at least reply with your typical conservative bull****. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
longwave wrote: Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: Read the official Navy records. Three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do you really believe someone goes out and says, "I think I'll get shot today, so I can win a medal and get out of here?" You dare to compare Kerry's military record with Bush's? Good luck. Please try and pay attention, Artie. I'm not doing a comparison at all. Try and do just a little bit of critical thinking, I know, I know, it's tough for you being a New York Liberal and all, but give it a try. Another non-responsive reply from DX Ace... That's his MO. Hey 'tard.... I DID respond... I was NOT making a comparison of Kerry's record to Bush's record. What you saw, and will continue to see is AH's continuous redirection. YOUR MO is that you're to damn stupid to follow the thread! dxAce |
In article ,
longwave wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to the issues I've raised. Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well thought out, and they require only a passing comment? Something for you to think about. More likely that you can't offer a well thought out rebuttal to his arguments. No it's more like if a person is to dense to understand then nothing you can post will make a difference. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com