( OT ) As the truth about Kerry emerges, the Democrats begin to panic
 

On 29 Aug 2004 16:56:19 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

On Sun 29 Aug 2004 10:29:08a, (Diverd4777) wrote in
message :

{snippage}

and remember, 9/11 happened on His Watch...


Correct, the "sucker-punch" attack was executed on Bush's watch. It was
undoubtably (in full or part): planned, funded, staffed and logistically
prepared for under Clinton's watch. Then the "Gorelick Wall", erected
during the Clinton watch, impacted the intelligence services ability to
"connect the dots". We could go on and on back three to perhaps six
decades or more.

What's your point? There's plenty of arm-chair quarter-backing to be done
following the sucker-punch the US received.


Four More Years...



Of Bush? Hopefully! At least, in my opinion - your opinion will surely
differ. Although, as I have mentioned before - if Kerry fails to win the
office, I can not think of anything else the Democratic party could
possibly do to get their favored candidate in office. Kerry has seen the
support of most any and every realistically imaginable strategy, tactic
and trick - good, bad or indifferent - to place him in office. If he
fails, what else could the Democrats do to ensure victory next time?


-=jd=-

We need more Bush. I would agree with that. I would gladly give up
some more taxes though to fund the war. Hopefully they can take N
Korea and Iran next year. Those dudes are super crazy and our boys
could put 'em down in a hurry. Does Iran have oil? Just curious.

In article ,
(Diverd4777) wrote:

In article , Dan
writes:

Subject: As the truth about Kerry emerges, the Democrats begin to panic
From: Dan
Date: 28 Aug 2004 16:38:14 -0500

It just keeps getting better and better.

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid...ichael_moo re


(AFP) - Controversial filmmaker Michael Moore has entered the fray over
Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry's Vietnam war record with a
sarcasm-soaked open letter to President George W. Bush accusing him of
"attacking a wounded vet."

Snip

Who cares what Moore thinks. He had his shot with his movie and he is no
authority on what happened in the 60's and 70's.

So he wrote a nasty letter to Bush, big deal. Moore in no saint in this
regard since he has attacked Bush's Nation guard service. This just
proves him to be a hypocrite as if anyone did not already know it.

I'm waiting for the next Mikey Moore movie "Kerry and me in Vietnam"
where Moore and Kerry commit authorities war atrocities together.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California