I'm curious... on the BBC World Service report about U.S. job numbers this
morning (1215 UT, 15190 kHz, SIO:434), the reporter failed to mention that
this is the worst economic performance by a U.S. president in over 70 years,
the worst job growth since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Even during
the depression, WW2, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Watergate, and
Monica-Gate, job growth was never this lousy.

Does anyone think the BBC WS is biased towards the sitting president by not
addressing these facts?

Perhaps the BBC WS of the same opinion and ideology as Dr. N. Gregory
Mankiw, the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (appointed by
President Bush and sworn into office on May 29, 2003) that "out-sourcing
American jobs off-shore is good for America." If this is so, why won't the
BBC WS be up-front and tell it's listeners?


"monsieur sandman" wrote in message
...
I'm curious... on the BBC World Service report about U.S. job numbers this
morning (1215 UT, 15190 kHz, SIO:434), the reporter failed to mention that
this is the worst economic performance by a U.S. president in over 70
years,
the worst job growth since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Even
during
the depression, WW2, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Watergate, and
Monica-Gate, job growth was never this lousy.

Does anyone think the BBC WS is biased towards the sitting president by
not
addressing these facts?

please, go back to school..

and stop posting this political stuff here.


On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:34:39 -0400, "monsieur sandman"
wrote:

I'm curious... on the BBC World Service report about U.S. job numbers this
morning (1215 UT, 15190 kHz, SIO:434), the reporter failed to mention that
this is the worst economic performance by a U.S. president in over 70 years,
the worst job growth since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Even during
the depression, WW2, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Watergate, and
Monica-Gate, job growth was never this lousy.

Does anyone think the BBC WS is biased towards the sitting president by not
addressing these facts?

monsieur sandman wrote:

Perhaps the BBC WS of the same opinion and ideology as Dr. N. Gregory
Mankiw, the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (appointed by
President Bush and sworn into office on May 29, 2003) that "out-sourcing
American jobs off-shore is good for America." If this is so, why won't the
BBC WS be up-front and tell it's listeners?

Why don't you ask the BBC?

That would be the 'smart' route to take.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

dxAce wrote:

monsieur sandman wrote:

Perhaps the BBC WS of the same opinion and ideology as Dr. N. Gregory
Mankiw, the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (appointed by
President Bush and sworn into office on May 29, 2003) that "out-sourcing
American jobs off-shore is good for America." If this is so, why won't the
BBC WS be up-front and tell it's listeners?

Why don't you ask the BBC?

That would be the 'smart' route to take.

And as a 'colonist' you'd probably have much more pull in eliciting an answer
from them.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

In article , dxAce
wrote:

monsieur sandman wrote:

Perhaps the BBC WS of the same opinion and ideology as Dr. N. Gregory
Mankiw, the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (appointed by
President Bush and sworn into office on May 29, 2003) that "out-sourcing
American jobs off-shore is good for America." If this is so, why won't the
BBC WS be up-front and tell it's listeners?

Why don't you ask the BBC?

That would be the 'smart' route to take.

I don't know about that answer. The BBC needs to check their facts first.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"monsieur sandman" writes:

I'm curious... on the BBC World Service report about U.S. job numbers this
morning (1215 UT, 15190 kHz, SIO:434), the reporter failed to mention that
this is the worst economic performance by a U.S. president in over 70 years,
the worst job growth since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Even during
the depression, WW2, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Watergate, and
Monica-Gate, job growth was never this lousy.

Does anyone think the BBC WS is biased towards the sitting president by not
addressing these facts?

Not sure but I *do* think you are a troll.

I'm hoping this posters' days are numbered. For you reference, the
fellow has used the following identities in this newsgroup over the
last week with his postings.

yojimbo
monsieur sandman
makihara
norman s. smiley
supernovii
son of mustang ford
pixonik
t-model ford
mental case
zerbo

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:50:04 GMT, Al Arduengo
wrote:

"monsieur sandman" writes:

I'm curious... on the BBC World Service report about U.S. job numbers this
morning (1215 UT, 15190 kHz, SIO:434), the reporter failed to mention that
this is the worst economic performance by a U.S. president in over 70 years,
the worst job growth since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Even during
the depression, WW2, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Watergate, and
Monica-Gate, job growth was never this lousy.

Does anyone think the BBC WS is biased towards the sitting president by not
addressing these facts?

Not sure but I *do* think you are a troll.

"JuLiE Dxer" wrote in message
...
I'm hoping this posters' days are numbered. For you reference, the
fellow has used the following identities in this newsgroup over the
last week with his postings.

yojimbo
monsieur sandman
makihara
norman s. smiley
supernovii
son of mustang ford
pixonik
t-model ford
mental case
zerbo


He needs a new one now that these have been "outed."

I recommend "anti-social college kid with no life and a brain to
match." I think it has a nice ring.