THE 41m & 49m BANDS
 

I find it interesting that the 2 bands that I usually pick up the best
are the 41 & 49 meters.

Most other bands don't come in too well. (Depending on the weather.)

And I never get anything on the 120 meter.

I use my radios telescopic antenna.

73

You will probably find things will improve significantly if you are able to
put up an outside antenna!

Mark.

"SR" wrote in message
...
I find it interesting that the 2 bands that I usually pick up the best
are the 41 & 49 meters.

Most other bands don't come in too well. (Depending on the weather.)

And I never get anything on the 120 meter.

I use my radios telescopic antenna.

73

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.


On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:21:57 +1300, "Mark" wrote:

You will probably find things will improve significantly if you are able to
put up an outside antenna!

Mark.

"SR" wrote in message
...
I find it interesting that the 2 bands that I usually pick up the best
are the 41 & 49 meters.

Most other bands don't come in too well. (Depending on the weather.)

And I never get anything on the 120 meter.

I use my radios telescopic antenna.

73

JuLiE Dxer wrote:

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.

No kidding. That's a real revelation.

Hello?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:05:17 -0400, dxAce wrote:



JuLiE Dxer wrote:

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.

No kidding. That's a real revelation.

Hello?

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Kinda like the revelation you're voting for Bush. Hello?

LMAO at the unemployed fat one that owes his current well being to
trial lawyers. And, a guy that claims he's some kind of great
American but doesn't believe in freedom of the press.

Born to be trolled. Muhahhahhahhahha

Billy Everhart wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:05:17 -0400, dxAce wrote:



JuLiE Dxer wrote:

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.

No kidding. That's a real revelation.

Hello?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Kinda like the revelation you're voting for Bush. Hello?

LMAO at the unemployed fat one that owes his current well being to
trial lawyers. And, a guy that claims he's some kind of great
American but doesn't believe in freedom of the press.

Fat? Trial lawyers? Freedom of the press? Unemployed?

Damn, you are certainly confused today, Billy.

Get back to me when those meds kick in.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

No disputatious diatribe, innate? Yer slippin' as bad as Shrub. Ya coulda at
least elucidated that most shortwave portables have medium wave attenuators
whose effects usually extend into 120 metre band reception. Even with an
outside antenna, Sony's 2010 has a hard time copying west coast a.m.ers on
1.925 mhz during their evening sessions. Barring mods to remove said
attenuators, porta-top & tabletop receivers are better suited for 120 metre
reception, propogation permitting.

elg110254 wrote:

No disputatious diatribe, innate? Yer slippin' as bad as Shrub. Ya coulda at
least elucidated that most shortwave portables have medium wave attenuators
whose effects usually extend into 120 metre band reception. Even with an
outside antenna, Sony's 2010 has a hard time copying west coast a.m.ers on
1.925 mhz during their evening sessions. Barring mods to remove said
attenuators, porta-top & tabletop receivers are better suited for 120 metre
reception, propogation permitting.

I don't tote a portable... so you must excuse my ignorance.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:49:54 -0400, dxAce wrote:



Billy Everhart wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:05:17 -0400, dxAce wrote:



JuLiE Dxer wrote:

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.

No kidding. That's a real revelation.

Hello?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Kinda like the revelation you're voting for Bush. Hello?

LMAO at the unemployed fat one that owes his current well being to
trial lawyers. And, a guy that claims he's some kind of great
American but doesn't believe in freedom of the press.

Fat? Trial lawyers? Freedom of the press? Unemployed?

Damn, you are certainly confused today, Billy.

Get back to me when those meds kick in.

dxAce
Michigan

USA



I can prove each of the above with one of your own posts. Would you
like me to do that? Mr dx lick? Or are you scared? Say uncle.

Muhahhahha ... lmao at the lawyer lovin 'tard.

Billy Everhart wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:49:54 -0400, dxAce wrote:



Billy Everhart wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:05:17 -0400, dxAce wrote:



JuLiE Dxer wrote:

Using the telescoping antenna is the major problem with your reception
on 120m.

No kidding. That's a real revelation.

Hello?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Kinda like the revelation you're voting for Bush. Hello?

LMAO at the unemployed fat one that owes his current well being to
trial lawyers. And, a guy that claims he's some kind of great
American but doesn't believe in freedom of the press.

Fat? Trial lawyers? Freedom of the press? Unemployed?

Damn, you are certainly confused today, Billy.

Get back to me when those meds kick in.

dxAce
Michigan

USA


I can prove each of the above with one of your own posts.

You can prove I'm fat? That'll be interesting.

I've never met a trial lawyer in my life. Fact.

I believe in a free press. Fact.

I'm unemployed by choice. Fact.

Good luck, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA